Conventional HD vs SSD?

Discussion in 'hardware' started by Daveski17, Nov 19, 2014.

  1. zapjb

    zapjb Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2005
    Posts:
    5,556
    Location:
    USA still the best. But barely.
    Booting to SSD is 17 sec (think it's because it's set to boot to CD 1st) with HDD it's 100 sec.

    As long as I take current OS images every once in a while & backup data I can't see giving up on SSDs.
     
  2. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,561
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Thanks for the feedback, I'm about to buy a new machine and these kinda comments are a bit confusing and worrying to me. Some say SSD's are not reliable, and others say that's nonsense. I do wonder if I should just stick to HDD's. BTW, on some machines they give you a 64GB SSD, but Windows is installed on the regular 1 TB HDD, this is completely useless right? For speed the Windows OS should be installed on the SSD, if I'm correct?
     
    Last edited: Nov 27, 2014
  3. mirimir

    mirimir Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2011
    Posts:
    9,252
    Yes, it's best to put the OS on the SSD, and data on the HDD. But decent 240 GB SSDs are getting more affordable, so I'd consider using two of them in RAID1 for redundancy.
     
  4. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    8,640
    Location:
    USA
    Any drive can fail. I have had worse luck with SSDs. You should have backups in any case. You should probably try a SSD to see how you feel about continuing with them in the future.
     
  5. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,561
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Yes, the Asus machine I bought earlier this year, had a 64GB SSD with nothing installed on it. When I copied some apps to it, I didn't see any speed difference, very weird. BTW, let's say the SSD with Windows dies, is there any way to still boot up Windows?

    Well, some comments including yours are worrying to me. Currently I have a 9 year old 250GB HDD from Maxtor, and even though it's highly fragmented, it's still working OK. How long do you think will a 120GB desktop SSD last? Does it also depend on how the SSD is used?
     
  6. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,561
    Location:
    The Netherlands
  7. mirimir

    mirimir Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2011
    Posts:
    9,252
    Well, you can always boot the install DVD. But if the SSD with Windows has truly died, there's nothing left to fix. That's why I said RAID1 aka mirrored disks. But I was forgetting the Windows aspect. I see that Windows does offer software RAID, but I don't know how reliable it is. I do know that "Intel motherboard RAID" is NOT reliable. And for what it's worth, I also know that Linux software RAID is reliable ;)
     
  8. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    8,640
    Location:
    USA
    Dead is dead. When mine died the laptop didn't even recognize there was a drive installed.
    Mine lasted about 3 years with light usage. You may consider that acceptable. My WD HDDs I put back are at least 5 years old and still going.
     
  9. Joxx

    Joxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Posts:
    1,718
    SSD as a boot disk.
    HDD(s) as storage disk(s).

    Macrium Reflect to create an image of the SSD to one of the internal disks, copy paste that image to an external disk.

    If the stored data is important use a file and folder sync software:
    sync from disk_1 to disk_2 (internal) and/or to disk_3 (external) and/or to the cloud (Dropbox type)

    There's also the NAS server solution which, though expensive, gives ease of use and reliability (plus you can do a lot of things with Synology's excellent, Linux based, software).
     
  10. Gullible Jones

    Gullible Jones Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2013
    Posts:
    1,466
    I'm currently using a 120 GB Kingston SSD in my laptop. It's fast and buggy.

    Pros:
    - Boot time is halved (for whatever that's worth)
    - Applications load a bit faster the first time
    - Backups and large file transfers take much less time
    - Not terribly expensive, and large enough for my needs
    - Comes packaged with an external drive enclosure and free partition backup software

    Cons:
    - The high I/O speed causes quirky behavior in some applications. e.g. VTE based terminal emulators seem to hang a lot.
    - Likewise, the laptop has developed some graphics and suspend issues that it didn't have before. No idea why.

    While it's fun to see a full KDE desktop load in 5 seconds, I'm not yet convinced that this was money well spent. The SATA drive enclosure was by far the best part of the deal IMO; as for performance, I saw more improvement in desktop responsiveness by propping up my laptop on makeshift legs (little adhesive plastic hooks that I bought for $1).

    So, for geeks I'm ambivalent; for end users, I'd recommend sticking with HDDs for a while longer.
     
  11. Keatah

    Keatah Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2011
    Posts:
    1,029
    The drive and its drivers are probably not configured correctly. And sometimes certain existing configurations just don't like to be upgraded.
     
  12. Keatah

    Keatah Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2011
    Posts:
    1,029
  13. mirimir

    mirimir Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2011
    Posts:
    9,252
    That is one plus for HDDs. With HDDs, mechanical components tend to fail before electronic components. And so failure is often gradual, allowing data recovery from failing drives. Several years ago, one of my HDDs developed a drive motor problem. Most of the time, it wouldn't spin up. But if I hit the computer case a few times, it eventually started. And it wasn't a loose power connector, by the way ;)
    Well, consumer SSD technology has improved a lot in the past three years.
     
  14. noone_particular

    noone_particular Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Posts:
    3,798
    I have an external hard drive that getting that way. It takes several minutes before it spins up. I can't complain as it's an 80GB drive and about 10 years old. For 8 of those years, it ran 24/7. Now it stores system backups.

    What is considered to be the expected life of a current SSD of decent quality? IMO, a 3 year lifespan is unacceptable. When I consistently get 10+ years from HDDs, a 5 year lifespan would be disappointing. For me, reliability is far more important than speed. I'm also concerned with secure file erasure on SSDs.
     
  15. Brian K

    Brian K Imaging Specialist

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Posts:
    12,146
    Location:
    NSW, Australia
  16. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,561
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    I have bought a desktop with a 128GB SSD, the speed is worth it. I can't imagine that it won't last longer than 5 years. It's from Toshiba by the way.
     
  17. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,561
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    A question to everyone who's using a SSD + HDD combo. How to setup the HDD? I've noticed that in the past few days I've been working only with the 128GB SSD, not that strange since Windows is installed on it, but what should be put on the 1TB HDD? And will it expand the life of the SSD? I must say that I'm impressed with the speed, everything loads faster and snappier. :)
     
  18. Minimalist

    Minimalist Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2014
    Posts:
    14,883
    Location:
    Slovenia, EU
    I use SSD for system and programs. I put my data on HDD. I leave my Pagefile on SSD. IMO you shouldn't worry about SSD lifespan. If you use it "normally", you won't wear it out.
     
  19. J_L

    J_L Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    8,738
    I moved the location of all my non-system/program data (My Documents, Downloads, etc.) to the HDD.
     
  20. mirimir

    mirimir Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2011
    Posts:
    9,252
    You could use the HDD for large files that you won't be editing a lot. If you do video, for example, you could keep files that you're actively working with on the SSD, and move older stuff to the HDD.
     
  21. Brian K

    Brian K Imaging Specialist

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Posts:
    12,146
    Location:
    NSW, Australia
    Put your "data" files on the HD. Keep the OS partition lean and mean. This makes for faster image backups and restores. Two minutes in my case for Win8.

    In the Win7 or Win8 Navigation pane on the left, in Favourites click Desktop
    Double click your username icon
    The following are icons to be dealt with....

    Contacts
    Desktop
    Documents
    Downloads
    Favorites
    Links
    Music
    Pictures
    Saved Games
    Searches
    Videos


    Right click the item, Properties, Location tab
    Change C to D (so you now might have D:\Users\Brian\Desktop)(assuming D is the drive letter of your partition on the HD)
    Apply
    Yes to "Create Folder"
    Yes to "Move Folder"
    OK

    Any files subsequently placed in the above folders will be placed on the HD, along with the files just moved.
     
  22. noone_particular

    noone_particular Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Posts:
    3,798
  23. NGRhodes

    NGRhodes Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2003
    Posts:
    2,381
    Location:
    West Yorkshire, UK
    Where did you get your 200 years from ?

    Don't forget the MTBF and the erratic behaviour that certain models behaved (they don't age/fail in the same manner to spinning disks) - the 840 Series started getting uncorrectable errors a third into its life.

    We are going to need someone like Google or Blazeback that can run and report on hundreds of SSDs being run in relatively well maintained environments over 5 or more years before we can compare trends and it will be a long time before SSD's will be suitable for use in the scale these guys use.
     
  24. NGRhodes

    NGRhodes Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2003
    Posts:
    2,381
    Location:
    West Yorkshire, UK
  25. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,561
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    @ Simplicity, J_L, mirimir and Brian K

    Thanks for the feedback. It might sound a bit strange but I actually save all of my important and most used files on the desktop. So instead of doing that, I will make a couple of folders on the HDD, with shortcuts on the desktop. This will save space on the SSD, and will put the HDD to work.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.