Intel x86s hide another CPU that can take over your machine (you can't audit it)

Discussion in 'hardware' started by lotuseclat79, Jun 15, 2016.

  1. lotuseclat79

    lotuseclat79 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Posts:
    5,390
  2. mirimir

    mirimir Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2011
    Posts:
    9,252
  3. Mrkvonic

    Mrkvonic Linux Systems Expert

    Joined:
    May 9, 2005
    Posts:
    10,224
    AMT, vPRO, whatever you wanna call it, has been around for more than a decade. No biggie.
    Go into BIOS, change, end of story.
    Mrk
     
  4. Gullible Jones

    Gullible Jones Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2013
    Posts:
    1,466
    @Mrkvonic

    Did you read the article? On newer Intel CPUs it cannot be disabled, and is required for a computer to boot.

    (I mean, it's only a permanent, low-level remote access tool that stays on all the time. Why would anyone want to turn it off, ever, for any reason? Surely the criminally inclined would never even think of using it!)
     
  5. Mrkvonic

    Mrkvonic Linux Systems Expert

    Joined:
    May 9, 2005
    Posts:
    10,224
    I don't read sensational articles on purpose, and I get my info from other sources.
    This is nothing new or special. Without going into details, this is not a problem.
    Mrk
     
  6. Gullible Jones

    Gullible Jones Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2013
    Posts:
    1,466
    @Mrkvonic

    There's a difference between being level-headed and being in denial.
     
  7. Mrkvonic

    Mrkvonic Linux Systems Expert

    Joined:
    May 9, 2005
    Posts:
    10,224
    There's also a difference between having in-depth technical knowledge of the technology and just talking FUD.
    Mrk
     
  8. CrusherW9

    CrusherW9 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Posts:
    517
    Location:
    United States
    'Newer' meaning in the last 7 years...
     
  9. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    8,644
    Location:
    USA
    Agreed. This article is sensationalistic clickbait and contradicts itself many times. Unfortunately, I did read it, just so I could say that. :argh:
     
  10. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,559
    Location:
    The Netherlands
  11. Fly

    Fly Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2007
    Posts:
    2,201
    @Mrkvonic,

    Could you substantiate why this would not be a possible source for concern ? It is what it is, it cannot be disabled and it cannot be audited.
    It is true that some organizations on this planet would be eager to have a tool for control.
    Oh, just like the NSA would never engage in dragnet surveillance ..
     
  12. Mrkvonic

    Mrkvonic Linux Systems Expert

    Joined:
    May 9, 2005
    Posts:
    10,224
    Forget about movies please, it does not work like that.
    It CAN be disabled, and therefore it is not an issue.
    Even if it is enabled, it is still not an issue.

    Now, as to why - please read the reference manual on amt and vpro, and you will see why not.

    Mrk
     
  13. BoerenkoolMetWorst

    BoerenkoolMetWorst Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,873
    Location:
    Outer space
    Terminology isn't being used correctly here. Intel ME(Management Engine) is part of the architecture in recent processors and can NOT be disabled. Intel AMT(Advanced Management Technology) facilitates remote management of ME and can be disabled in bios. Intel "vPro" is used by Intel to cover a multitude of technologies, and is also often used as a synonym for AMT.
    Joanna Rutkowska(Known for Bluepill "Ring -1" hypervisor rootkit and QubesOS) has written a paper with more technical information:
    http://blog.invisiblethings.org/2015/10/27/x86_harmful.html
     
  14. lotuseclat79

    lotuseclat79 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Posts:
    5,390
    Nothing like one of Joanna's papers to clear the air about the topic!

    Thanks for posting the link!

    -- Tom
     
  15. lotuseclat79

    lotuseclat79 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Posts:
    5,390
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.