AV-Comparatives File Detection Test March 2014

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by MrBrian, Apr 24, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. MrBrian

    MrBrian Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Posts:
    6,032
    Location:
    USA
    http://www.av-comparatives.org/detection-test/

    Background info from Wikipedia:
     
    Last edited: Apr 24, 2014
  2. spywar

    spywar Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2012
    Posts:
    583
    Location:
    Paris
    Avast! :blink:
     
  3. Minimalist

    Minimalist Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2014
    Posts:
    14,883
    Location:
    Slovenia, EU
    ESET missed quite a few samples :thumbd: but scored great with FPs :thumb:.
     
  4. anon

    anon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Posts:
    8,006
  5. MrBrian

    MrBrian Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Posts:
    6,032
    Location:
    USA
    Noted. This is a different test than the title of that thread though. IMHO, when there are separate but related items, the best thing to do is have a separate thread for each item, and if desired post hyperlinks to those related threads.
     
    Last edited: Apr 24, 2014
  6. malexous

    malexous Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Posts:
    830
    Location:
    Ireland
  7. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,251
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    No Symantec this time? o_O
     
  8. Gein

    Gein Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2013
    Posts:
    219
    F-Secure pretty high up there.
     
  9. DOSawaits

    DOSawaits Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2008
    Posts:
    469
    Location:
    Belgium
    No Kaspersky, no party.
     
  10. Gein

    Gein Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2013
    Posts:
    219
    They sort of make up for it in the PUA detection. They've actually caught a lot of stuff malwarebytes misses in the last couple of computers I've cleaned.
     
  11. Noob

    Noob Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    6,491
    Now that i think of it, Emsisoft went from insane FPs to almost nothing. Good job!
     
  12. ance

    ance formerly: fmon

    Joined:
    May 5, 2013
    Posts:
    1,359
    MSE 90 % and 1 FP, nice. ;)
     
  13. Blackcat

    Blackcat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    4,024
    Location:
    Christchurch, UK
    They have always done well in static file detection.
     
  14. Pat MacKnife

    Pat MacKnife Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2014
    Posts:
    620
    Location:
    Belgium
    Norton never take part of this test , just like comodo because they are not best friends with AVC group
     
  15. SweX

    SweX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Posts:
    6,429
    No afaik it's more or less that Symantec don't want to participate in all of the tests. I believe it works like a "test serie" meaning a vendor can't just pick the RWPT but drop out on the File Detection test. It's all or nothing wich I personally think is fair.
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2014
  16. Noob

    Noob Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    6,491
    And also because they say that these file detection tests are meaningless (They got low scores before pulling out).
     
  17. malexous

    malexous Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Posts:
    830
    Location:
    Ireland
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.