View Full Version : Hotmail takes a tougher stance on spam
ronjor
June 23rd, 2005, 08:56 AM
-{ Quote: "The software maker has begun warning Hotmail users with an on-screen alert when the sender of an incoming e-mail cannot be verified using its Sender ID Framework. Mail that fails to pass the test will be placed in a junk mail folder or could even be deleted, according to Craig Spiezle, director of Microsoft's Technology Care and Safety Group." }-
Article (http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/06/23/HNhotmailspam_1.html?source=rss&url=http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/06/23/HNhotmailspam_1.html)
trickyricky
June 23rd, 2005, 02:42 PM
That is just typical of Microsoft, forcing their own decisions on the internet community as a whole. Have they not heard of the RFC route for getting changes made?
I wouldn't mind if their aggressive behaviour left us with better systems, but you only need look at Outlook and Outlook Express to see how good their "improved" standards are when put into practise.
It makes me mad, and no, I'm not habitually a Microsoft-basher.
pamelajoy
July 13th, 2005, 02:02 PM
I like Hotmail. So far it has worked well for me. I need to check my junk mail folder to be sure everything I want is getting through. In the past year or so, the spam filtering has been great. Hotmail is a good way to get newsletters because even if your Hotmail address gets out, you don't have to deal with the spam from it.
Infinity
July 13th, 2005, 05:05 PM
-{ Quote: "I like Hotmail. So far it has worked well for me. I need to check my junk mail folder to be sure everything I want is getting through. In the past year or so, the spam filtering has been great. Hotmail is a good way to get newsletters because even if your Hotmail address gets out, you don't have to deal with the spam from it." }-
Same story here, I got hotmail catching 90% of what I consider spam...
and it works with pop3 ... and nod32 ;D
Paranoid2000
July 14th, 2005, 03:36 AM
-{ Quote: "Hotmail is a good way to get newsletters because even if your Hotmail address gets out, you don't have to deal with the spam from it." }-I'd suggest an alias system like SpamGourmet (www.spamgourmet.com), SneakEmail (www.sneakemail.com) or SpamMotel (www.spammotel.com) as being a better solution since these allow you to give a unique address to every newsletter or website. If you subsequently receive spam, then you can identify who is responsible for "leaking" your address as well as shutting down that alias.
SpamGourmet seems to be the easiest to use (you can create aliases on the fly for your account without having to visit its website) and offers more advanced functionality to block more "sophisticated" spammers (prefixes, watchwords, etc) along with a number of alternative domain names (if you don't want to give your friends an "obvious spamtrap" address).
vBulletin® Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2012, Wilders Security Forums