spy1
March 29th, 2003, 09:51 AM
(This "Act", if passed as written, will impact individual computer users' "security" to an extent I can only scratch the surface of at the moment. It is not meant as a political post - it is a warning).
The applicable section ( 8 ) of the one proposed for S.C. reads:
"It is unlawful for any person knowingly to:
(ii) To conceal - or assist another to conceal - from any communication service provider or from any lawful authority, the existence or place of origin of or destination of any communication;"
(I added the bolding and italics for emphasis - Pete).
So put aside the worries about "illegal firewalls" for a moment and think about the above in relation to the following pieces of software:
(a)Proxies (anonymous or otherwise)
(b)ALL "anonymous" (or fake) email accounts/"remailer" programs and/or IM-type programs (with or without encryption).
Also think about the impact on services such as Anonymizer/Freedom, etc..
As written, anonymity itself would be totally outlawed.
There is no "mistake", "stupidity" or "redundancy of previously-written legislation" here, folks - this is just one of many simultaneous snakes slithering through the grass that are going to lead up to the day when you will be required to have a "personally unique identifier" sent along with every attempt to access anything on the Internet. Pete
Background article here(along with list of states that are jumping on board with this one): http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/archives/000336.html
The applicable section ( 8 ) of the one proposed for S.C. reads:
"It is unlawful for any person knowingly to:
(ii) To conceal - or assist another to conceal - from any communication service provider or from any lawful authority, the existence or place of origin of or destination of any communication;"
(I added the bolding and italics for emphasis - Pete).
So put aside the worries about "illegal firewalls" for a moment and think about the above in relation to the following pieces of software:
(a)Proxies (anonymous or otherwise)
(b)ALL "anonymous" (or fake) email accounts/"remailer" programs and/or IM-type programs (with or without encryption).
Also think about the impact on services such as Anonymizer/Freedom, etc..
As written, anonymity itself would be totally outlawed.
There is no "mistake", "stupidity" or "redundancy of previously-written legislation" here, folks - this is just one of many simultaneous snakes slithering through the grass that are going to lead up to the day when you will be required to have a "personally unique identifier" sent along with every attempt to access anything on the Internet. Pete
Background article here(along with list of states that are jumping on board with this one): http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/archives/000336.html