GeeeAus
February 3rd, 2005, 02:32 AM
Just curious to know if Acronis TrueImage offers optimised data compression or decompression speeds by utilising any of the SIMD instruction sets offered by today’s platforms.
Which CPU architecture offers better imaging and restoration performance? "Generally speaker of course".
I'm not asking Acronis or other users for a recommendation of one platform over another. However has anyone from Acronis or other users of the forum ever benchmarked the same data set with different processor architectures?
Is the P4 quicker than the Athlon 64 or vice versa.
Does TI include 3DNow!, 3DNow! Professional, SSE 1 2 or 3 or MMX optimisations of any kind. If so are they only available in the Windows application, or do the Linux and recovery products also carry this support?
Do machines with better generic FP87 floating point units fair better, or is mainly integer based?
Etc. etc.
GeeeAus
In Oz
Which CPU architecture offers better imaging and restoration performance? "Generally speaker of course".
I'm not asking Acronis or other users for a recommendation of one platform over another. However has anyone from Acronis or other users of the forum ever benchmarked the same data set with different processor architectures?
Is the P4 quicker than the Athlon 64 or vice versa.
Does TI include 3DNow!, 3DNow! Professional, SSE 1 2 or 3 or MMX optimisations of any kind. If so are they only available in the Windows application, or do the Linux and recovery products also carry this support?
Do machines with better generic FP87 floating point units fair better, or is mainly integer based?
Etc. etc.
GeeeAus
In Oz