trevor12
December 14th, 2004, 04:57 PM
generally I tried to find firewall with ability to protect against "side effects" any application, called "phoning home" (for example to check if licence is ok or stolen - kg, crack, loader etc.) without knowledge of this fact of user of this application.
I dont mean applications with neccassary access to site of author for updates of avir bases (in this example it is maybe impossible to fight against this "attack") but generally other applications that not requires access to any websites, for their functions is sufficient ruh as standalone app or app with access anywhere but not to site of their authors without knowledge of users.
For example
http://www.tinysoftware.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=703
http://www.tinysoftware.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=540
If it is possible to be protected with LnS against this type of "attack", what rule in LnS is correct for protection ?
I dont mean applications with neccassary access to site of author for updates of avir bases (in this example it is maybe impossible to fight against this "attack") but generally other applications that not requires access to any websites, for their functions is sufficient ruh as standalone app or app with access anywhere but not to site of their authors without knowledge of users.
For example
http://www.tinysoftware.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=703
http://www.tinysoftware.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=540
If it is possible to be protected with LnS against this type of "attack", what rule in LnS is correct for protection ?