View Full Version : It doesnt clean up Photoshop and Dreamweaver MRU's
us100
November 17th, 2004, 03:09 AM
Why not? It should have a smart scanning engine that scans the registry for ANY possible mru, not just the pre-determined ones.
It didnt clean my Photoshop CS most recently used, and the Dreamweaver MX 2004 too. It probably doesnt do the other Macromedia products too.
No smart scanning engine possible, eh ? Isnt there a pattern for any MRU? Then you could use that kind of pattern scanning to make the smart scanner.
Gosh, dont tell me you guys didnt put an Uninstall option ?
Your icons are messed up too but that might be my problem cause I've been seeing messed up icons on my computer.
And after the first time I scanned, I had a LONG list. I feel many of those items could be groups together for easier review. I wanted to disable it from cleaning my most recent used programs in XP, but couldnt.
Bubba
November 20th, 2004, 11:31 AM
Some....if not all of your concerns\suggestions might be addressed in a new release that could be coming soon. Hopefully you can also find the patience as Javacool works not only on MRU-Blaster but his other software programs. The you guys that you posted above....is one individual doing this in his spare time along with life's other expectations. While this may not directly address your concerns....hopefully you'll understand these Freeware programs provided are being updated as soon as possible....given the facts above of a one man operation.
r00ted
November 28th, 2004, 04:50 AM
I hope Im not "taking over" this thread.....but, wouldn't it be possible to make some sort of "kill-bit" thing, like SpywareBlaster and Spybot S&D Immunize, which would stop MRUs from being used in applications?
erikguy
November 28th, 2004, 10:12 PM
Try Safe XP.... (www.theorica.net)
Yeah, I know... I'm back. It's been a while. This new apartment life is rough! :)
r00ted
December 16th, 2004, 11:13 AM
does Safe XP require the program to be ran 24/7? 1 of the things I like about SpywareBlaster and MRU Blaster is the fact that you can just set them to run on reboot, and once the updates are done, they can be closed, so to not use any much needed CPU cycles or RAM.
Daiki
December 17th, 2004, 12:20 PM
I think thatSafe XP just applies the following registry
settings.
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/2000/server/reskit/en-us/Default.asp?url=/resources/documentation/Windows/2000/server/reskit/en-us/regentry/93170.asp
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/2000/server/reskit/en-us/Default.asp?url=/resources/documentation/Windows/2000/server/reskit/en-us/regentry/93173.asp
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\policies\Explorer]
"NoRecentDocsHistory"=dword:00000001
"NoInstrumentation"=dword:00000001
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\Explorer]
"NoRecentDocsHistory"=dword:00000001
"NoInstrumentation"=dword:00000001
These settings don't affect to program specific MRU's.
vBulletin® Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2012, Wilders Security Forums