PDA

View Full Version : Windows File Protection disabled and no alert


Frieza
September 20th, 2004, 12:55 PM
I am using Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2 (AMD XP 1.5GHZ 760MB RAM 120Gig HDD).

I needed to temporarily disable my Windows File Protection in order to patch a file so I downloaded this program from here:

http://www.snapfiles.com/download/dlwfpadmin.html

I was interested to see if Process Guard would alert me to this applications attempt at disabling Windows File Protection so I left all of Process Guards protection enabled which includes all of the ''General Protection'' options.

Although I had to permit this program to run from MD5 execution protection, when it did run it disabled Windows File Protection with no alerts from Process Guard at all.

I emailed DCS regarding this twice with no reply so I post here instead. Perhaps there was a problem with email I don't know.

I just feel that this program being able to disable WPF with no alert from Process Guard should be looked into. I tried this on Process Guard V3 public Beta with the same results.

Wayne - DiamondCS
September 20th, 2004, 01:45 PM
ProcessGuard is for process and kernel protection, watching WFP (files) doesn't really fit under that umbrella so PG was never designed for that. PG does actually block many WFP-disabling methods due to its protection techniques, but they're not specific to WFP.

WFP isn't a very strong form of protection anyway (f.e. the developers of the excellent LitePC (http://www.litepc.com/newsarchive.html) program have recently incorporated one of my tricks to gracefully defeat WFP so that users of the program no longer need to reboot before they can use it), and trojan/virus/worm authors have never found WFP to be a barrier - it can even be bypassed to some extent without having to disable it anyway. I don't recommend using it for security purposes, but rather to prevent things like accidental deletion.

We may add WFP-watching capabilities into a future build of PG, but at this stage I wouldn't consider it a high priority addition. We'll see...

Cheers,
Wayne