View Full Version : Process Guard vs Gunbound ?
Myztik
September 13th, 2004, 09:14 PM
Ok Process guard is a great program and i have used it for awhile now. A Game i have played for 1 year that im addicted to has just recently patched its game cause of process guard hacking. I personaly dont hack using this . But now you cant even access the game if u have process guard installed.
1) Is there gonng be an update for this ?
2) Is there a simular program out there like process guard ?
Thanks For the Help.
Myztik
420
September 13th, 2004, 10:09 PM
Damn I smell Law suit
Kaye
September 13th, 2004, 10:20 PM
I too have a similar problem. Last week I was evaluating process Guard and found it to be a rather useful program, even though it did take some time to setup properly. I was considering buying the liscence for the full version when yesterday i logged into Gunbound and found that I could not.
Further examination of gunbound.net revealed that all users of ProcessGuard are not allowed to login to gunbound. I believe this not to be the case just for gunbound but a large majority of Korean games as they all utilize nProtect. Is it possible for DiamondCS to rectify this problem? Any feedback would be much appreciated
hmmmm
September 13th, 2004, 10:41 PM
Gunbound has a Weak security BUT DONT BAN THE PROCESS GAURD !
WE PAY MONEY FOR A GOOD PROGRAM LIKE THAT ..... :'(
Devinco
September 13th, 2004, 11:05 PM
{QUOTE-> Ok Process guard is a great program and i have used it for awhile now. A Game i have played for 1 year that im addicted to has just recently patched its game cause of process guard hacking. I personaly dont hack using this . But now you cant even access the game if u have process guard installed.
1) Is there gonng be an update for this ?
2) Is there a simular program out there like process guard ?
Thanks For the Help.
Myztik <-QUOTE}
Welcome to Wilders Myztik.
How are they using Process Guard to hack? What are they able to hack with it?
SSM (System Safety Monitor) is the closest to PG, but a little different.
Myztik
September 13th, 2004, 11:18 PM
You add Explorer.exe - allow Flag- and it bypasses gunbound security so you a can open hacks. But some of us dont hack, and we are being punished cause of hackers. Process Guard Pretty much allows u to by-pass gunbound security. Now we either have to use process guard and not play gunbound or vice versa. Reall Sux cause i have worked on this rank in this game for over a yr.
I hope you gues look into this.. I know for a fact there has been over 30 email to you guys about this from some forums im on. =~P
Hope you guys come back shootin... If you think about it, they are takin your customers. I have talked to serveral guys about this and they where going to purchase process guard also. Now they cant make up their mind wich is more important
???
September 13th, 2004, 11:19 PM
um for the hacks people use process guard to stop the nprotect the anti hack software for gb for enterin into the hack file inorder to detect it. so they do some settings in pg and add that as a program to protect and it works.
Wayne - DiamondCS
September 13th, 2004, 11:36 PM
See this thread (http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?p=256767#post256767) also.
Indeed it's a strange one. By developing the worlds most powerful kernel protection system we've inadvertently defeated the simple protection mechanisms of a game protection program (nProtect), and thus are now seen as the ones 'at fault' by Softnyx (Gunbound author and user of nProtect). Clearly if a software protection feature can be stopped by something like Process Guard which isn't even a hacker/cracker tool then it's weak and shouldn't be used for protection.
Myztik
September 13th, 2004, 11:58 PM
Ty for the info.. Is there a way to still use process guard and gunbound same time ? thats pretty much my question right now. Or will that be in an update . or at all ?
Peter2150
September 14th, 2004, 12:06 AM
Jimminy Christmas. If you have to turn off the best protection on the market to play a game, there ought to be a clue there.
Would you turn off your firewall to play a game??? ???
Tassie_Devils
September 14th, 2004, 12:31 AM
{QUOTE-> Jimminy Christmas. If you have to turn off the best protection on the market to play a game, there ought to be a clue there. <-QUOTE}
Absolutely Peter :)
{QUOTE-> Would you turn off your firewall to play a game??? ??? <-QUOTE}
Only if you like "Base Jumping", without the benefits of a parachute mate. ;D
Cheers, TAS
TJ420
September 14th, 2004, 03:59 AM
basically what happened was.. there was a bypass for nprotect and it was patched by nprotect. what u did was inject 2 dll files into explorer.exe and when u opened gunbound you could use tools for memory editing and aimbot. but then it was patched and this time after u injected then started gunbound, nprotect would restart your explorer.exe and your injection was then useless. so someone thought hmm if i inject these 2 dlls then use process guard to protect my explorer.exe from nprotect then it wouldnt restart and things would be ok. then they patched process guard. basically what i think is it looks for PG's self protection and sees if its active or goes through the registry to see if PG is installed. Nprotect used to be bypassed by doind another method where u installed IIS on your PC. Then you created your own webserver for the nprotect files and basically tricking the nprotect program into thinking it updated to the newest version and it was all good but you were actually using its oldest files from when it was first released and you could use old hacks or bypass it alot easier then normally. So this shows the program is rather weak also considering the fact that these 12-15 year old kids are messing around with nprotect which is made by older people.
GunboundLuver
September 14th, 2004, 04:24 AM
Process Guard is a wonderful program that help me block some processes that i dun want it to run but Nprotect Blew it cos now i have to unstall it to play GB?? no way!!! i want to play Gb n i wan to Use Process Guard anyway to help me to this?:(
Peter2150
September 14th, 2004, 08:31 AM
Gunboundlover
Since you want to run both, I assume protection is of some interest to you. This may prove to be an ongoing problem, and frankly I would hope DCS doesn't compromise Process Guard in the slightest for this kind of issue.
Some suggestions:
1) The obvious, but one you don't want: Give up the game.
2) Get a separate computer just for the gaming, and don't worry to much
about the security issue.
3) and this would be my actual recommendation to you:
Check out Raxco's (www.raxco.com) First Defense - ISR. It will allow you to create a separate snapshot (you do need diskspace) that you can use for your game playing. You boot to the game snapshot, and turn off PG, and whatever else may interfere with the Game. Then boot back to your primary snapshot for other stuff. Should your game snapshot get infected it can't affect your main snapshot, and then you just refresh the game snapshot from the primary one, and presto, infection gone.
Pete
KoreaBoy
September 14th, 2004, 09:10 AM
As far as I can understand, the aimbot people are discussing seems to read the memory and work with it, rather than reading packages.
People here posted "this got patched", as in "this is now detected by Nprotect".
As for Nprotect itself, it prevents hacking by loading a special module via "dll injection" onto ANY program's memory, blocking or changing some kernel-based memory/debugging functions like ReadProcessMemory, so they specifically return error codes or invalid read-ups, if the "target" is the game's name.
The way Nprotect, from Inca, "patch" (as in "detects the hacks"), is by adding signatures from functions used inside the code or by string recongnition after a search through that program's memory.
If by any time, that special module recons any signature on the program where it's loaded, one of two things happen:
If nprotect is not able to terminate that program with a matching signature, It issues a shutdown signal to the main module of nprotect. Gunbound, (or the protected game) shuts itself down, in the case of it's protection is closed (and presents a "hack detected" checkbox).
In the even the "illegal" program is able to be closed directly, Gunbound and it's protection will remain active, but still issueing that message box, same way.
What does ProcessGuard has to do with this?
It prevents the load of that "special module" onto the hack program, by adding protection onto it.
Therefore, no string recognition is in order, and most importantly, the original kernel memory functions are preserved and are usable.
The hacks "bypass" (as in the common word for "is not detected by") Nprotect defensive modules.
Forcing the users to terminate ProcessGuard, would re-allow the Nprotect to gain Write/set info/read/terminate privilleges onto any program loaded in the system, therefore injecting successfully the "special module" and detecting the "aimbot" or "hack" mentioned.
Is this measure (detecting ProcessGuard as a common hack) "legal"?
I think so, because Gunbound is a free game, and to play it we have to abide by their rules on it. Any quarrel over this and the result would stll be the user's choice to decide between the game or the ProcessGuard.
It is the similar case as the quarrel that happened some years ago, when some software came up with a counter-debugging technique to prevent "Softice", by detecting this debugger's name and modules, and even spying the registry and Windows load modules. The result was precisely this : "either the user chooses other debugger rather than "SoftIce", or chooses to use other software".
Oremina
September 14th, 2004, 09:33 AM
The mind boggles!! ::)
someGuy1337h4x
September 14th, 2004, 09:57 AM
1. from what i heard is that gunbound has something called "cash" in game which u can buy with real money(more info www.gunbound.net)
2.if people bought both that and diamondcs game guard which one will they choose? plus, if The hacks bypass Nprotect defensive modules , that means nprotect is weak, its not DCS's fault. again DCS has nothing to do with it, do you think a game's security is more important than player's computer security.
{QUOTE->
(from PEACEYALL)
Nprotect is Illegal ( From my point of view )
In my point of view I find that Nprotect is illegal for these reasons,
1. They check your task list for programs and send a log ( Thats evading MY privacy which is illegal!! )
2. It crashes my explorer if i inject dll's which is bad cause my pc restarts when my explorer crashes sometimes and i was on a folder i rwas looking for badly and i started gb and my explorer crashed so therefor i lost the folder ( This is not form a service pack update caus ei didnt update my service pack ).
3. They should atleast put a prompt when they update so i can choose Yes or No ( But if no they tell you that you cant play ) Because if they just update its like auto-accept when someone sends u a file on irc and maybe its a keylogger , who knows maybe there sending keyloggers sometimes so they can track hacking progees.
4. They dont even have a privacy policy or a T.O.S and if they do they should tell us wat it is before we d/l updates or the program!!
5. Nprotect is technically a spyware or adware and in this folder c:\documents and settings\[username]\local settings\temp\ there files called np***.tmp which are form nprotect and each are like 500 - 1000 kb and there all trash, thats just like a hacker puttin stuff on your computer that you dont need and is trash just to make your space little!!
So those are the reasons i think Nprotect is illegal and i could probably sue them but maybe not, so from your point of view wat do u think?
Cause all i got to say is NPROTECT IS ILLEGAL!
<-QUOTE}
KoreaBoy
September 14th, 2004, 12:16 PM
{QUOTE->
1. They check your task list for programs and send a log ( Thats evading MY privacy which is illegal!! )
<-QUOTE}
Anti-virus like BitDefender do this too, as the users themselves might be possible trojen makers, and helps global security by logging their own customers.
So far, it was not considered, illegal. I think it is considered the best in the world, I must add.
{QUOTE->
2. It crashes my explorer if i inject dll's which is bad cause my pc restarts when my explorer crashes sometimes and i was on a folder i rwas looking for badly and i started gb and my explorer crashed so therefor i lost the folder ( This is not form a service pack update caus ei didnt update my service pack ).
<-QUOTE}
This is obviously a joke or something. So many applications crash explorer.exe and none, that I recall/used was considered illegal. Even ProcessGuard crashes explorer.exe if some system apps are protected (and explorer has no "allow" privilleges over them).
{QUOTE->
3. They should atleast put a prompt when they update so i can choose Yes or No ( But if no they tell you that you cant play ) Because if they just update its like auto-accept when someone sends u a file on irc and maybe its a keylogger , who knows maybe there sending keyloggers sometimes so they can track hacking progees.
<-QUOTE}
If they'd do that, the game hackers would obviously put no, and the protection would be absolutely useless.
{QUOTE->
4. They dont even have a privacy policy or a T.O.S and if they do they should tell us wat it is before we d/l updates or the program!!
<-QUOTE}
You are correct. No explanation of GameGuard is present on the site of Gunbound.
{QUOTE->
5. Nprotect is technically a spyware or adware and in this folder c:\documents and settings\[username]\local settings\temp\ there files called np***.tmp which are form nprotect and each are like 500 - 1000 kb and there all trash, thats just like a hacker puttin stuff on your computer that you dont need and is trash just to make your space little!!
<-QUOTE}
It is a spyware, in it's true meaning, so far not considered malicious. Logs the aplications running, not the contents of it. The temp files problem are indeed true, but how many Microsoft apllications do exactly the same if not worse ?
{QUOTE->
So those are the reasons i think Nprotect is illegal and i could probably sue them but maybe not, so from your point of view wat do u think?
<-QUOTE}
I think you could make a good point and a good argument (of course with a very good lawyer) but nothing more than that.
{QUOTE->
1. from what i heard is that gunbound has something called "cash" in game which u can buy with real money(more info www.gunbound.net)
<-QUOTE}
Yes, not part of the free game. As in an extra. The full features are available for free.
{QUOTE->
2.if people bought both that and diamondcs game guard which one will they choose? plus, if The hacks bypass Nprotect defensive modules , that means nprotect is weak, its not DCS's fault. again DCS has nothing to do with it, do you think a game's security is more important than player's computer security. <-QUOTE}
Obviously the player's computer is more important. And correct, if the hacks bypass nprotect, that is nprotect's business, not DiamondCS. If gunbound team decides to make keep protection against processguard, the only ones being harmed are the users, who are exposed, and It would be nice of Gunbound Team to present their users with a security solution, after the so called "ultimatum" (Gunbound, or ProcessGuard).
Devinco
September 14th, 2004, 12:59 PM
Are these Gunbound hacks being used just for game cheats (aimbots and such), or are they being used to compromise and infect other player's computers?
If the latter, how are they doing this?
Gunboundaim
September 14th, 2004, 02:17 PM
ok "Aimbot" = 2 programmes running at the same time means the line is on top of Gunbound that helps ppl aim thats all.
gunbound is absurb
September 14th, 2004, 02:39 PM
Basically, nProtect is doing stuff that is ILLEGAL.
first of all, it is a spyware, which someone had stated earlier.
This is ILLEGAL IN USA, as it conflicts with the Internet Privacy Treaty Signed by Bill Clinton.
I also dont see why users dont get to read any terms of agreement, as when i signed up for gunbound, they DIDNT stay Processguard MUST be deleted, and that they will install crap on my computers, which is nProtect, AKA spyware hacking tool.
I dont remember ever agreeing to these terms and giving permission for that.
So what does this means? Gunbound scammed me? Should I consult a lawyer for that.
I dont see why users can REFUSE updating of nProtect. You can always BAN the users OUT OF GB who dont update.
I dont see how come you cannot patch the hacks even if lamers try to bypass it using Processguard. If such a weak defense system and weak programmers does exist, GB IS HOPELESS. By banning processguard, it makes no differences. Users will seek after programs made by other companies that does the SAME OR BETTER function, ie a squared, symantec's Norton Systemworks.
So is gunbound going to ban every single company and stripping us of our anti virus, firewall and security?
Then gunbound gonna promote a FIREWALL or antivirus program that ONLY works if u want to paly gunbound? So every single user must BUY IT???
Or gunbound wants to strips us of our security so that nProtect can have an easier time hacking us, stealing our paypal passwords etc?
I dont play gunbound, but I have pg installed. The problem is my youngest brother plays this stupid lame games, and to make him happy, I have to install all these load of shit spywares on my computer and delete such a wonderful program.
I have checked around several other websites, and found out that the "hackers" are already using other bypasses by microsoft, symantec, and own made bypasses. So gunbound gonna ban them all huh???
And to koreaboy, who thinks gunbound programming code is better than microsoft, as he said earlier in his post. My question is why is ur company still so dumb then? U cant even program a good game security system. If u make an OS, it gonna get hacked like no tomorrow.
And why is Gunbound hiring stupid hackers ie Xanatos who installed keyloggers, trojans, spywares in other people's computer just to hack them? Afterall Xanatos isnt the only hacker who made hacks for gunbound. Is this one of gunbound's plan to install keyloggers in everyone's computer in the future with the help of little xanatos?
Gunbound, do reflect.
I hope progessguard will come up with a new version that changes the reg key name of the processguard process so gunbound will not be able to block it.
If gunbound says this is for the best security system, thats bullshit. Valve and Blizzard was able to reduce hackers on their games(counter-strike, warcraft 3) to less than a 0.001%. They were constantly able to detect hacks and stop them from spoiling the game without installing crap on people's computer or blocking other programs. So what does this means. Gunbound programmers need to attend college's programming classes. Go start with Basic programming with C++, COMSC-101 n00bs.
Pilli
September 14th, 2004, 02:46 PM
Hi gunbound is absurb.
Please do not make personal comments about individuals.
If you have evidence that gunbound contains malware please show it, as we do not condone this sort of speculation at Wilders without any proof.
Thanks. Pilli
gunbound is absurb
September 14th, 2004, 02:57 PM
Hi.
U can always download gunbound at www.gunbound.net
install it, and connect to server.
after that, exit gb and look at the nProtect.
if u scan it with any anti virus or any anti spyware/ or keylog or anti adware program, gunbound and nprotect always somehow appear on the list and the threat is considered HIGH
thanks
Notok
September 14th, 2004, 03:49 PM
I'm no programmer, but I wouldn't think it would be that hard to put in a patch that looks for the DLL and allows/denies the game to start/get on the server based on that, and denies anyone that doesn't have the patch installed and fuctioning properly.
Next thing you know the people using the hacks will start using rootkits and become targets in a whole new (very bad) way.
Gunbound is absurb
September 14th, 2004, 04:28 PM
The new bypass utilizes a new form of protection system similar to the one enforced in Process Guard.
It also hides the process of the program from appearing in the processes tab and can appear by going to the start menu, click run, and the program name.
chances of getting detected is very slim tat way, as the program is almost working in "total silence".
this new bypass shows that gunbound is already ineffective.
i hope diamondcs and gunbound can do something
KoreaBoy
September 14th, 2004, 04:51 PM
{QUOTE-> And to koreaboy, who thinks gunbound programming code is better than microsoft, as he said earlier in his post. My question is why is ur company still so dumb then? U cant even program a good game security system. If u make an OS, it gonna get hacked like no tomorrow. <-QUOTE}
Who told you I am part of the programming group, the staff, the moderation team, or even the players'.
I have nothing related to these, and I don't play Gunbound. I am a strict user of ProcessGuard and also a professional programmer. I inspected gunbound and this nprotect, becasue I heard HERE what was going on. I posted to clarify most of the kid's comments who are somewhat dificult to decode, and
decided to give my opinion. Make no judgement, as this composes my opinion only. Besides, I have played other online games before with a similar defense system, so I know it's functionality.
Chris420
September 14th, 2004, 06:25 PM
{QUOTE-> The new bypass utilizes a new form of protection system similar to the one enforced in Process Guard.
It also hides the process of the program from appearing in the processes tab and can appear by going to the start menu, click run, and the program name.
chances of getting detected is very slim tat way, as the program is almost working in "total silence".
this new bypass shows that gunbound is already ineffective.
i hope diamondcs and gunbound can do something <-QUOTE}
Wow what craziness. Look my daughter plays this game "Gunbound". I have had her state issues related to my copy DiamondCS PG. She says I have to uninstall it. This is not acceptable so I told her that she can’t play her game anymore and well to say the least she was quite distraught. So I gave in and uninstalled PG for her. I now need something that does the same thing as PG since I can no long use it. Are there any suggestions as to a something that does similar things? Time is of the essence, I don't wish to leave my pc unprotected for long, and installing and uninstalling pg every time my daughter wished to play is also unacceptable.
What is this program you speak of? Does it have a name and how much does it cost?
Chris420
September 14th, 2004, 06:28 PM
Oh and yes I tried SSM my daughter also says her game won'y play with that installed? Is it this gunbound game's policy to blacklist all protection software on the market?
I'm begining to think that this game is more or less malicious software intended to force people from removing protection from their computers in order to hack them. If this is the case please tell me so I can remove "Gunbound" from my PC, and explain things to my daughter.
KoreaBoy
September 14th, 2004, 07:09 PM
Strange how you expect advirtisement to concurrent software to appear here. There are some but they are, obviously, not going to be published here. Besides, in some of it's features, ProcessGuard is unique. Very unique.
Notok
September 14th, 2004, 07:27 PM
Honestly, which is more worth it? PG, which will protect you from the effects of the most malicious malware, including that which is designed to capture personal data that can lead to identity theft, or a game that mandates that you NOT take such measures?
Just about any other game out there will work with PG going, Doom 3 even seemed to work BETTER with it (blocking global hooks seemed to stop it from crashing), if you ask me it's time to look for a better game... especially if you have a kid using the same computer that isn't as aware of safe computing habits.
Ideally any kid should have his or her own computer for the sake of the parent's safety. An adult undoubtedly has financial information to protect, and the kid isn't going to necessarily know that opening that cool screensaver from c1byr-d00d is going to ship those details off to Russia the next time you check your bank statement online. If getting a new computer just isn't feasible, you are left with no less responsiblity to keep that kind of information safe.
Would you make the same kind of compromise in any other area of your life?
TJ420
September 14th, 2004, 09:09 PM
{QUOTE-> Wow what craziness. Look my daughter plays this game "Gunbound". I have had her state issues related to my copy DiamondCS PG. She says I have to uninstall it. This is not acceptable so I told her that she can’t play her game anymore and well to say the least she was quite distraught. So I gave in and uninstalled PG for her. I now need something that does the same thing as PG since I can no long use it. Are there any suggestions as to a something that does similar things? Time is of the essence, I don't wish to leave my pc unprotected for long, and installing and uninstalling pg every time my daughter wished to play is also unacceptable.
What is this program you speak of? Does it have a name and how much does it cost? <-QUOTE}
I think this guy just wants a name of another program so he can hack gunbound lol...
Mr.Blaze
September 14th, 2004, 10:19 PM
8) closed huh blaze rule with iron monkey fist lol
will the hacke made since in theory but most bs does personaly this game sounds lame
ehhhhhhhhhhhhhh
LowWaterMark
September 14th, 2004, 10:20 PM
We don't need two topics on the same thing, especially since this isn't a Process Guard support problem, and this is the Process Guard forum. So I'll close this thread now.
Let's keep it over in this other thread:
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=47827
vBulletin® Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.