CryptoSuite Benchmark Public Beta

[Jason_R0]

I have been working on a new benchmark for CryptoSuite for the upcoming release. It has been improved a lot, it now includes 2 synthetic tests, graphical comparisons and an online component.

There is still some work to be done (especially on the online side), and it still isn't 100% polished, however running this and submitting your results would be very beneficial for us.

This has been tested on Windows 98/2000 and XP, so everyone with Windows should be able to run it just fine.

To test all you need to do is download this ZIP file and extract it to a directory, then run cryptosuite_benchmark.exe and click on Start Test. After the tests have completed you can submit your results. Of course everyone can submit their own suggestions if they have any.

Anyone can download this and test, you don't have to be an existing CryptoSuite user to take advantage of this. Thanks everyone. :)

http://www.diamondcs.com.au/cryptosuite/downloads/cs_bench.zip

[Pilli]

Here you go Jason, I have also submitted to your data bank.

Can you allow copy from the text results as it won't do it ATM :)

Here is a screenie anyway:

[nick s]

Thanks Jason. Submitted my results as well.

Nick

[WYBaugh]

Here's my slow machine Jason

http://www.buttuglysoftware.com/Jason.jpg

[anon]

My machine is 1203mhz AMD athalon, 128k L1 cache, 256k L2 cache, 256 meg ram, and my score is 8258.

[Jason_R0]

{QUOTE-> Here you go Jason, I have also submitted to your data bank.

Can you allow copy from the text results as it won't do it ATM :)

Here is a screenie anyway: <-QUOTE}

Do you mean you want to be able to copy the contents from the listview display? Thanks for the submission. :)

[Jason_R0]

8) 8) Thanks for your submissions everyone. :)

[Pilli]

{QUOTE-> Do you mean you want to be able to copy the contents from the listview display? Thanks for the submission. <-QUOTE}

Yes, much like in CS where you highlight the text and it is automatically copied to the clipboard.

Pilli

[Tassie_Devils]

Mine and submitted...

TAS

[Caliban]

Here be mine...

[Dazed_and_Confused]

...and mine.

[Q Section]

and....

[Dazed_and_Confused]

{QUOTE-> and.... <-QUOTE}
Showoff... ;D

[Q Section]

{QUOTE-> Showoff... ;D <-QUOTE}Sorry, dear. Must keep up with the Joneses. :D

[nick s]

For the CPU experts, is there a relationship between the size of L1 cache and better Integer and FPU performance? From the results, it seems like there is.

Nick

[Caliban]

I don't believe it is the L1 cache as much as it is the chip architechture. The AMD proccessor is better at integer and floating point because it does more computations per cycle and doesn't have the handicap? of the deep pipeline of the P4.

[nick s]

{QUOTE-> I don't believe it is the L1 cache as much as it is the chip architechture. The AMD proccessor is better at integer and floating point because it does more computations per cycle and doesn't have the handicap? of the deep pipeline of the P4. <-QUOTE}
Thanks for the info.

Nick

[Jason_R0]

Well admitably I have not added any optimizations for any CPU. However the deep pipeline of the Intel P4 does not like what I am currently doing. I will be optimizing the FPU and INTEGER code for longer pipelines in the next version of the benchmark, however the AMD will also benefit from this optimization, not just the Intel, but it should close the gap. The AMD chips are even struggling with the FPU and INTEGER benchmark currently, but due to its 2/5 shorter pipeline it scores a lot better than the Intel P4.

So in summary, can the current FPU and INTEGER code be better optimized for longer pipelines? Yes. It still shows though that some CPUs have a big advantage over other CPUs when you don't try and write heavily optimized long pipeline code (a lot of compiled code falls into this region).

[Jason_R0]

{QUOTE-> Here be mine... <-QUOTE}

I am very impressed with the Encryption and Hash tests on your CPU. Even though the synthetic benchmark scores are bad (due to the even longer pipeline of the prescott), you can see when you mix memory speed and optimized code, the Prescott has a big advantage. We need some Athlon 64 scores in here now. :)

[Tassie_Devils]

hmm... turned off a few things and increased mine by around 400.. ;D

TAS

[Dazed_and_Confused]

Now I'm really depressed. I guess that means I shouldn't have been such a penny-pincher when I bought my box. ::)

[puff-m-d]

Here is my screenshot:

[Jooske]

Ok, not too bad, not too exceptional

Wonder what you closed Tassie, me with windows only got only an overall cryptomark score of 13489 and the individual values raised to
9505 -- 5512 -- 15641 -- 18653 in stead of those from shot below.
Guess as the system is still new can use lots of finetuning once i know it a bit better.

[FanJ]

LOL Here comes mine ;D

P3, 600 mhz, Asus P2B mobo, 512 MB RAM, W 98 SE.

Almost everything was disabled during the test.
I still have to submit.

Cheers, Jan.

[Dazed_and_Confused]

Thanks, FanJ. I think your just trying to make me feel better. ;D

[Mr.Blaze]

:o what the heck this mean i got nothing 0 every one else got scores

is my pc impdent

[Mr.Blaze]

:D i think i made every one feel better lol acording to this my pc is dead and flat linded and your all a figment of my imagination lol


so im not really online im in a insaine alsylume posting on an imaginary message bord lol

[puff-m-d]

MR.BLAZE,

Did you hit the start test button and wait for it to finish?

[Mr.Blaze]

:o :-[ damn it of course i didnt hit start lol

brb

Success: !-JOL77723-!

[Mr.Blaze]

;D lol lol

[FanJ]

LOL Blaze ;D

I almost fell off my chair laughing ;D ;D ;D

{QUOTE-> your all a figment of my imagination lol

so im not really online im in a insaine alsylume posting on an imaginary message bord lol <-QUOTE}

You could make that your new sig ;D

[Pilli]

ROFL Blazie - More of a dieing ember then a blaze 8)

[Jooske]

Heya Blaze, almost as good as my old win98se system (running several programs, if i don't forget i'll make another one with all programs closed, including TDS and the firewall, expecting it to climb a bit in values)
j/k

[TheQuest]

Mine.

[Andreas1]

yawn.
here's mine.
can't even submit - but don't tell me that's because of my hardware :lurking:

Cheers,
Andreas

[Mr.Blaze]

what kinda pc does it take to max out those stats

[Andreas1]

{QUOTE-> what kinda pc does it take to max out those stats <-QUOTE}

hey blazey.
i know it's not easy. be sure not to move the mouse while benchmarking ;)

(but in actual fact I'm still quite happy with my machine. did much tweaking to get a reasonable responsive environment, both in Win/Linux)

LOL
CU,
Andreas

[TheQuest]

Hi, Mr.Blaze

in a insaine alsylume posting on an imaginary message bord lol ;D

So you are in my house eating all my food. :o

Take Care,
TheQuest 8)

[Peter2150]

Okay, couldn't resist, so here are my results

[Peter2150]

Also took a look at cpu loading while the benchmark was running. Note I ran the benchmark after rebooting with nothing else running, but none of the normal stuff shut down.

[Jason_R0]

{QUOTE-> Also took a look at cpu loading while the benchmark was running. Note I ran the benchmark after rebooting with nothing else running, but none of the normal stuff shut down. <-QUOTE}

Yes since you have a P4 with HyperThreading it basically tells Windows you have a DUAL CPU installed.

The benchmark doesn't utilize both CPUs at the moment, however that might be a good test to add in the future for testing multithreading performance of a system.

[Peter2150]

{QUOTE-> Yes since you have a P4 with HyperThreading it basically tells Windows you have a DUAL CPU installed.

The benchmark doesn't utilize both CPUs at the moment, however that might be a good test to add in the future for testing multithreading performance of a system. <-QUOTE}

Hi Jason

Not sure exactly how Intel decides where stuff runs under HT. What was showing up in both windows of the task manager display was the benchmark. Nothing eles was running. I have experimented with an excell spreadsheet doing an autoformat, and if nothing else is going on it will split between the 2 cpu's, like above. But if I put a DVD movie on that will take about 10% of one cpu, and then the spreadsheet will run totally in the other cpu. So it splits the process depending on what else is going on. Be interesting to see the effect of any modification.

Pete

[nick s]

Played around for the first time with overclocking a new Athlon 64 FX53 system I put together. System seemed stable, but overclocking is new to me. Best scores, no tweaks, are 20134 and 36090.

Nick

[Pilli]

Very impressive Nick ;D

[Peter2150]

Shows two very different scores on Nicks test. In the graphic it shows 20k+ and down below it is 36K+ Which is right??

[Jooske]

Hi Peter, both are right: the higher score is the one from CryptoSuite, the other is from the benschmarktool.

[Infinity]

here is another one:

[Pilli]

Woohoo! Infinity, Super score, what is the machine spec please?

Pilli

[Infinity]

Hi Pili, I haven't figured out how to post the full screenie and posting it twice would be not so smart I guess :D

but it is a prescott 3.4 550 with 512 ddr 533Mhz. not overclocked yet, wouldn't dare but soon I will give it a shot.


bizar how the second test is much lower as the rest...

[Infinity]

tweaked a little bit: overclocked to 3500Mhz

[NOD32 user]

Not the highest benchmark here, but I think its O.K. for a p4 2.8.... ;)

[Infinity]

yes, nicely overclocked system, is it stable?

[NOD32 user]

{QUOTE-> yes, nicely overclocked system, is it stable? <-QUOTE}
Very stable - I run it like that full time. No temperature issues even at full load for hours at a time. Good hardware :)

DFI LanPartyPro875b with a P4 2.8 northwood

[Infinity]

nice!!

[Sweetie(*)(*)]

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=148475&stc=1My score, not sure if its any good?

[Pilli]

Hi Sweetie, {QUOTE-> My score, not sure if its any good? <-QUOTE} Looks about right for your particular CPU and RAM ;D

[NOD32 user]

{QUOTE-> ... is it stable? <-QUOTE}
Should mention running FSB @ 880 is a walk in the park for the 875 chipset - hence its name 'Canterwood'
If anyone is willing to buy new hardware afterwards if needed I'd be willing to see how far it can actually go - I haven't tried overvoltage yet, any recommendations?

[Infinity]

I managed to overclock my 3.4 prescott (775 socket) to 3.695 (3.7 :D) without any problems but was getting quite hot (58C idle) so I removed it...

my benchmark scores here are from my non overclock period (and I am back there but this evening I will do it again - msi)

cheers

[Sweetie(*)(*)]

{QUOTE-> Should mention running FSB @ 880 is a walk in the park for the 875 chipset - hence its name 'Canterwood'
If anyone is willing to buy new hardware afterwards if needed I'd be willing to see how far it can actually go - I haven't tried overvoltage yet, any recommendations? <-QUOTE}


Ive had my FSB to 1001mhz, 3ghz chip running at 3.66ghz, stable untill heats up.

[Sweetie(*)(*)]

That was running at about 1.7v on the chip, ram also up.
Im lucky in that my case has very good cooling, Thermaltake Tsumami; 2X 120mm fans, 1X90mm fan(side), twin PSU fans, Big heatsink,the case is a bit wider than normal, all aluminium and running good hardware.

Asus P4P800 D
3.06 P4
1024 DDR500/PC4000 Geil ram
120gb/8mb sata
Ati X800 GC

Ive had it stable on 3.543ghz (case temp 38c) for a several hours, running games etc, could leave it there when the room temp is not too hot, but on warm days the case temp goes to 46c, chip to 58c.

[Bowserman]

Here's my bash at it with my new comp (old one completely carked it lol...lightning) nothing overclocked, just some processes disabled :).

Regards,
Jade.

[Pilli]

Jade - Blinking show off! ;D (That was the polite reply) ;)

[Sweetie(*)(*)]

Good score that L2 cache really makes a big difference, mabey i should run the test with my PC overclocked...lol

[NOD32 user]

{QUOTE-> Ive had my FSB to 1001mhz, 3ghz chip running at 3.66ghz, stable untill heats up. <-QUOTE}
Thats pretty impressive
I took courage from hearing of your 1000FSB and snuck another 40 onto my own FSB taking it to 920 FSB and DDR460. Am testing for temp and stability - so far very good, but I still haven't upped the voltages. 1.7v sounds a lot above 1.52 to me when the voltage steps are a fraction of that each.

{QUOTE-> Good score that L2 cache really makes a big difference, mabey i should run the test with my PC overclocked...lol
<-QUOTE}
I'd like to see that !

[puff-m-d]

It has been a while since I done a benchmark on my system so here goes:

[Bowserman]

Excellent score Kent! How did you manage to bring your score up so much since your last test?

Regards,
Jade.

[Infinity]

yes, would like to know that too, one of the highest scores I've seen at the encryption tab...nice

[NOD32 user]

Do tell - Whatever you've done to get your encryption tab up must mean your system absolutely flies !!

[Pilli]

He probably adds methanol to his electricity supply ;D

[NOD32 user]

puff-m-d I'm not going to accuse you of anything, but I am just wodering - did you "help" your score? Thats seems to be a very high score.

[Infinity]

Maybe he spoofed his processor :P

maybe he has a P3.4 Extreme Edition and a tool that masquerades this as an P4 3.0 :)

just kidding

[NOD32 user]

{QUOTE-> Maybe he spoofed his processor :P

maybe he has a P3.4 Extreme Edition and a tool that masquerades this as an P4 3.0 :)

just kidding <-QUOTE}

lol
I don't know but if it's a legit result I want to know what's been done to get it ;D

[puff-m-d]

Hi Jade,

{QUOTE-> Excellent score Kent! How did you manage to bring your score up so much since your last test? <-QUOTE}All I can say is this... The first time I ran the benchmark, I just done that, ran the benchmark... I left a lot of processes running and so on, so the results were on a machine with quite a few processes running. This time when I ran the benchmark, I closed all but the essential system processes. The only other difference to my machine since then, and I have no clue as to whether it helped or not, is that the software on my motherboard (ie. bios, chipset, etc.) was quite a bit out of date. I upgraded to a very recent set of software not to long ago. As far as to "helping" my score, I would not even know how to. I know nothing of overclocking or any other tweaking that may be done to improve scores. Also the score I got is very repeatable and only varies about 10 points. I am sorry but as to why the large increase especially in the encryption area, I have no clue as to why as the only 2 things different to my knowledge was the number of running processes and the upgrade of software for my motherboard.....

[Jason_R0]

{QUOTE-> Hi Jade,

All I can say is this... The first time I ran the benchmark, I just done that, ran the benchmark... I left a lot of processes running and so on, so the results were on a machine with quite a few processes running. This time when I ran the benchmark, I closed all but the essential system processes. The only other difference to my machine since then, and I have no clue as to whether it helped or not, is that the software on my motherboard (ie. bios, chipset, etc.) was quite a bit out of date. I upgraded to a very recent set of software not to long ago. As far as to "helping" my score, I would not even know how to. I know nothing of overclocking or any other tweaking that may be done to improve scores. Also the score I got is very repeatable and only varies about 10 points. I am sorry but as to why the large increase especially in the encryption area, I have no clue as to why as the only 2 things different to my knowledge was the number of running processes and the upgrade of software for my motherboard..... <-QUOTE}

Would you mind posting a whole screenshot of the window, with as much of the listview shown as possible. I'm thinking maybe the encryption is failing, leading to the decryption part not being down, however if this was the case you would receive an error message in the listview.

[ReGen]

http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/hesten/3500.gif

Athlon 64 3500+ Winchester (90nm) core, clocked at 2.3 GHz (should be 2.2). I'm using AMDs 'Cool & Quiet' option so the multiplier takes a fraction of a second to move up from 5* to 11* as the load increases - but I doubt the results would be effected too much by this, as their seems to be a ‘Warm-up’ period in the tests anyway. :)

[Infinity]

this is the very best I could do

I have a prescott 3.4 stocked at 3400mhz and I have it overclocked this time at 3845 running smooth (never new that btw)

[Infinity]

this time I overclocked to 3915 and if I add some mhz it needs to reboot so I know I have to quit now ;D ;D

I am impressed btw (I have in fact a theoretical 3850MHZ)

yieehaaa

[Bowserman]

Excellent scores ReGen and INFINITY :). I wonder what you would score in Super Pi at stock and then overclocked INFINITY.....with the 1MB test. The lowest I can get is 40secs here.

@ Jason - Maybe you could make it so the user can define the amount of times each specific test is run and then calculate the average for that. Oh....and don't forget to add Hyper Threading support ;D.


Best regards,
Jade.

[Bowserman]

Hey Jason, why dont you ask this guy to run a CryptoSuite Benchmark ;D ;D :

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=53037


Regards,
Jade.

[NOD32 user]

{QUOTE-> Hey Jason, why dont you ask this guy to run a CryptoSuite Benchmark ;D ;D :

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=53037


Regards,
Jade. <-QUOTE}
:-\ ??? :-\ ??? :-\

[Bowserman]

{QUOTE-> :-\ ??? :-\ ??? :-\ <-QUOTE}

It was a joke ::) ......back on topic.

The most I can get at stock is 18249 here. Much better than my old 8000+ scores with a P4 1.6 :).

Regards,
Jade.

[NOD32 user]

{QUOTE-> It was a joke ::) ......back on topic.

The most I can get at stock is 18249 here. Much better than my old 8000+ scores with a P4 1.6 :).

Regards,
Jade. <-QUOTE}
It was pretty funny - I was going to post some pics like it here for all to enjoy.
If I manage to push my bench over 14863 I'll re-post. Heavy duty benchmark. In most my system eats prescotts, but not this one. I wonder if Jason is going to release it as a standalone app?

[gkweb]

new comp here, new results :) (not overclocked)

[Bowserman]

Nice score GK ;D.....bet you're going to have a lot of fun with your new computer mate.

Regards,
Jade.

[Billy Blaze]

I knew I should have overclocked :(

[Billy Blaze]

AMD seems to do a lot better than Intel in synthetics.

Can someone donate an AMD64 FX-55 Clawhammer to test? :)

[DougRees]

AMD 3500+ (Winchester) overclocked to 2.4GHz.

[Infinity]

Nice score Doug, standard you have a better score then me: but I just received new memory, time to play again I see :)

take care

[Jason_R0]

The AMD 64 E revision CPU's will be out shortly, apparently you can overclock them to 2.8GHz and beyond on standard air cooling. Would make a good benchmark test. :)

[Infinity]

The last two years AMD has made some tremendous steps forward regarding heating and power :) I have seen Intels eaten by AMD like 150 times now... It's quite amazing imho

My next computer would definately be an amd :) definately ;)

[Billy Blaze]

Not bad for a CPU with no L2 cache ;D

Intel Pentium M 2.0GHz Dothan
2MB L2 cache

[Infinity]

Dothans / Pentium M are considered the best cpu's made by Intel (pentium three was awesome too imo) but it is still amazing Intel's scores on the Floating Points test...:D there lies the main difference with AMD I guess, not only graphical wise I'm affraid. the new venice will be impressive...

[Billy Blaze]

My integer and FPU scores are good for Intel but nothing compared to AMD. I think my poor hashing and encryption score is due to my aging 855 chipset which supports 400MHz FSB by default. I read that my board can support a 533MHz FSB but after lowering the mulitplier to 16x, I did not find an option to raise my FSB to 533MHz.
TechSupport was of no help either. :-\

On the plus, what really excites me about this setup is that temps have remained quite cool. Mid-low 20°C idle and low 30°C under load. The CPU fan is incredibly tiny as well. Even my case temps run a few degrees higher than CPU temps.

But will wait to see how it will do when it gets really hot in summer.

[nick s]

Now running a Gigabyte K8N Ultra-SLI with an Athlon64 FX55 2.6Ghz processor. No overclocking scores 21924.

Nick

[Infinity]

I am impressed Nick!!!The processor you are mentioning is the top of the bill ;) and I think you can be sleeping on both ears for a long time with this one ;) wonder what your memory bandwidth is? Incredible FPU results and I bet that is the reason why amd is kickin Intel's a$$ :D

Andy

[nick s]

{QUOTE-> I am impressed Nick!!!The processor you are mentioning is the top of the bill ;) and I think you can be sleeping on both ears for a long time with this one ;) wonder what your memory bandwidth is? Incredible FPU results and I bet that is the reason why amd is kickin Intel's a$$ :D

Andy <-QUOTE}Hi Andy,

It does rock ;). I have a lot to learn when it comes to hardware and overclocking. FWIW, I ran across ScienceMark (http://www.sciencemark.org/) and used it to measure my bandwidth at 2.737 Ghz.

Nick

[nick s]

When I pushed it just a little more to 2.747, I got this strange result. So now I am not sure how valid the previous score is.

Nick

[Jason_R0]

I think for some reason your overclocked system has produced an error in the encryption code and made it quit sooner than it should have for some reason. When your CPU is overclocked it can produce errors in the code which usually lead to crashes or unpredictable results.

Go here and run Prime95 to see if there is any errors when running at that speed.
http://www.mersenne.org/freesoft.htm

Ideally the benchmark should be saying that the encrypted/decrypted code didn't work by checksumming, I will have to check this beause it should be doing it already. :)

[Infinity]

With my San Diego 3700+ en GSKILL 2.5-3-3-7 .

2750 (250*11) was possible and anything higher was a bsod.

Heat is my biggest problem, cause those gskills can go to 275*11 under the right conditions (water cooling or dry ice-vapo) 8)

[z.k.]

Which CPU is better for encryption (especially for AES algorithm) Athlon64 3000+ or P4 3.00?
Thanks.

[Inf.]

I guess Intel is better in some cases, and encrypting should be one of them as it uses a special instruction set optimized a little better by Intel.

When looking at the new amd64 3000+Venice, you should get enough power for demanding tasks. Cause the new amd's are getting a stronger grip on the other area's lately as well ..

[Caliban]

Oh how it would be to have a multi threaded benchmark, just for giggles here is the test score on my new Pentium D 840.

[Inf]

Dothans are one of the best Processors made and I said that with Pentium M 770 too :) I wonder why they cannot make something like that for Desktops .. the only thing happend is some mobo manufacturer created a custom made motherboard to use that processor
http://www.gamepc.com/labs/view_content.asp?id=dothandesktop&page=5

strange...cause the main issue with pentium is their heat .. biiiig issue compared to amd.

That's a high end score for a laptop Calidan :)

[TheQuest]

Hi,

The next one is very strange.

Take Care,
TheQuest 8)

Edit: Can not attact Image, even stranger

[TheQuest]

Hi, Jason

Have a look at this strange BM.

Take Care,
TheQuest 8)

[passing thru]

Saw a similar BM here (but the system bluescreened before I could take a pic).

[TheQuest]

Hi, passing thru

{QUOTE-> Saw a similar BM here (but the system bluescreened before I could take a pic). <-QUOTE}
Sorry to hear of your Bluescreening, mine is stable but with the weird result[s].

Take Care,
TheQuest 8)

PS: What MB and CPU do you have [used for BM]? Asus A8N-E and AMD64 X2 4200 for mine.

[TheQuest]

Hi, Jason

Just bumping my #105 post

Take Care,
TheQuest 8)

[Infinity]

Jason busy with working.

He already addressed this behaviour, it happens with new computers with high mhz's I believe.

I wonder how superpi will do ;)

[Caliban]

My new box, stock, no overclock. :D

[Jason_R0]

There is an issue with validity of the encryption test taking place. If the system is unstable it seems to quickly "error" out of the encryption test, making it appear like it completed the operation quickly.

[TheQuest]

Hi, Jason_R0

Thank for getting back.
{QUOTE-> If the system is unstable it seems to quickly "error" out of the encryption test, making it appear like it completed the operation quickly. <-QUOTE}
{QUOTE-> Sorry to hear of your Bluescreening, mine is stable but with the weird result[s]. <-QUOTE}
I think it this soso Asus MB :-\ , I am going to have to go back too Abit ;D .

Take Care,
TheQuest 8)

[Pilli]

This is from my new pc with no overclocking and several other apps running:
Dual core AMD 4400+ 1GB of DDR400

CS1.1 benchmark

--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 2211MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 1022MB
Total time taken: 15375ms
Average time for each test: 2196ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 32520 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------

[Peter2150]

I haven't installed anything to take a screen shot yet, but couldn't resist a couple of passes of the benchmark on my new box.

Out of the box with no overclocking it averaged 23500.

Will post screenies as soon as I can.

Pete

[Infinity]

I would like some links to the old benchmark download ..

I have recently bought a x2 4400+ with 2*1024 OCZ 2-3-2-5 ...

but what I get is like 22000 ... aren't you guys overclocking it? .. ..???

[Pilli]

Hi infinity, I am not overclocking my PC nor was I at the time of the test.

Make sure you have no other backround programs running, as they may cause spurious / lower results:)

Pilli

[Infinity]

ok, cause this result I get is from overclocking 230*11 ... time to do it without any other processes in background (I should have done this from the first time lol)

Thanx