PDA

View Full Version : EAM + Mamutu


ingem64
September 21st, 2010, 09:13 AM
My setup:
- Emsisoft Anti-Malware 5.0
- GesWall
- Windows firewall XP
- Router

Do I need Mamutu? ... or uninstall GesWall and install only Mamutu?

Thank you.

Rules
September 21st, 2010, 09:31 AM
-{ Quote: "My setup:
- Emsisoft Anti-Malware 5.0
- GesWall
- Windows firewall XP
- Router

Do I need Mamutu? ... or uninstall GesWall and install only Mamutu?

Thank you." }-

Mamutu is a part of Emsisoft Anti-Malware 5.0, so if you use Emsisoft Anti-Malware 5.0, you use Mamutu :)

Rules.

shadek
September 21st, 2010, 10:18 AM
EAM has Mamutu included. :)

ingem64
September 21st, 2010, 10:41 AM
Thank you.
:D

microbial
September 21st, 2010, 01:27 PM
I wish I'd purchased EAM rather than just Mamutu now. Oh well...

Syobon
September 21st, 2010, 01:47 PM
I know Emsisoft is very good with high detection rates even for 0-days but...
seriously how can you guys use a software that demands so much CPU and RAM, last time I tested Emsisoft (default settings) was eating over 200mb of RAM and CPU usage in the 30% constantly.... :gack:

subratam
September 21st, 2010, 02:57 PM
-{ Quote: "I know Emsisoft is very good with high detection rates even for 0-days but...
seriously how can you guys use a software that demands so much CPU and RAM, last time I tested Emsisoft (default settings) was eating over 200mb of RAM and CPU usage in the 30% constantly.... :gack:" }-
Could you kindly let me know when did you test last time and what version. It would be beneficial. I just checked with a deep scan running, alongwith number of applications running, chrome, games etc. and this is what I have as attachment.

Boyfriend
September 21st, 2010, 03:09 PM
Current version is much faster with low RAM and CPU usage. I am running it in Windows XP SP3 VM with 384 MB RAM and it is still fast without any slowdown/hang/crash.

shadek
September 21st, 2010, 05:31 PM
The slowdown is not due to RAM or CPU usage but due to the HDD-access. That's what slows the computer down. Modern computers do not lack RAM or CPU power. It's how smart an AV reads/writes to the HDD that matters.

Jav
September 21st, 2010, 05:38 PM
-{ Quote: "The slowdown is not due to RAM or CPU usage but due to the HDD-access. That's what slows the computer down. Modern computers do not lack RAM or CPU power. It's how smart an AV reads/writes to the HDD that matters." }-
Was EAM's default settings only on-execution scan?
Been couple of month seen I have used it last time, so sorry I can't remember.

Noob
September 21st, 2010, 07:19 PM
-{ Quote: "Was EAM's default settings only on-execution scan?
Been couple of month seen I have used it last time, so sorry I can't remember." }-
It was . . .
Now the default is On Execution with Created or Modified.

EAM is VERY VERY light IMO. The only thing that i hate is the On Demand scanning speed ::)

Jav
September 21st, 2010, 08:45 PM
ok, Thank you

subratam
September 22nd, 2010, 03:33 AM
-{ Quote: " The only thing that i hate is the On Demand scanning speed ::)" }-

We are working on that currently. If interested then you are encouraged to join the beta test http://support.emsisoft.com/topic/2679-current-beta-tests/

Fabian Wosar
September 22nd, 2010, 02:23 PM
Since I just did some performance tests of the new engine anyways I will share one of the results with you so you get an idea of how much faster the new engine actually is:

Full Scan (400 GB of data, 390k files)
Old Engine: 80 minutes 54 seconds
New Engine: 23 minutes 27 seconds

pabrate
September 22nd, 2010, 02:36 PM
That's good news for scanning.

But is it still bloated in usage without scanning ?

For example , it used to take min. 5 seconds to open Task Manager , when I saw this I did instant removal.

Boyfriend
September 22nd, 2010, 02:41 PM
WOW! Great improvement. How full scan optimize scanning so much? Does it scan with both engines while checking all files including packed/archieved objects?

Syobon
September 24th, 2010, 08:24 PM
-{ Quote: "Could you kindly let me know when did you test last time and what version. It would be beneficial. I just checked with a deep scan running, alongwith number of applications running, chrome, games etc. and this is what I have as attachment." }-

I was using the last version found in the website, with the behavior block and antivirus on, used Process Explorer to monitor the cpu/ram usage and the values are the same in both windows 7 and windows 2008, my machine is a dual core with 2gb RAM, also tested several other suites (sophos, cis, kis, avast, etc) none had such weird system impact.

molhopicante
September 24th, 2010, 11:00 PM
I have an Mamutu license and EAM trial.

Why application rules auto generate in Mamutu but in EAM they still in blank?

Or i'm doing something wrong in EAM?

I'm feeling like malware ids is inactive in EAM.

Fabian Wosar
September 25th, 2010, 03:22 AM
-{ Quote: "Why application rules auto generate in Mamutu but in EAM they still in blank?" }-
If you have both installed at the same time only one of the applications will do behavior blocking. The other application will internally disable all abilities covered by the other application.

molhopicante
September 25th, 2010, 08:36 AM
Thanks for your reply.

I'm testing it so i only use one at the time, closing the other.

-{ Quote: "If you have both installed at the same time only one of the applications will do behavior blocking. The other application will internally disable all abilities covered by the other application." }-