SpywareBlaster 3.1 released!

[javacool]

SpywareBlaster 3.1 has been released!

New in this version:
-Restricted Sites Protection
-Mozilla/Firefox Protection
-A brand-new interface
-And many, many other new features and changes!

This 3.1 release provides bug fixes and enhanced performance.
The Mozilla/Firefox protection should now correctly detect profiles for Mozilla 1.7 & Firefox 0.8 and up.

NEW UPDATING OPTIONS IN SPYWAREBLASTER 3.1
SpywareBlaster still offers the built-in Check for Updates feature. This feature is completely free and allows you to keep up-to-date by clicking on a button in the SpywareBlaster interface.

SpywareBlaster 3.1 now offers SpywareBlaster AutoUpdate - a brand-new updating solution. Just set it up, and AutoUpdate will check at every system boot for the latest updates and enable the newest protection (other options are available).

As much as we would like to provide auto-updating functionality for free, bandwidth costs are simply too great to make it feasible. AutoUpdate functionality is $9.95 (US) per year, which helps to cover the bandwidth costs. The Check for Updates function remains completely free, as does SpywareBlaster. You only need to pay if you wish to have the extra convenience of AutoUpdate.

Download the latest version here: http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster.html

Enjoy! ;D

Best regards,

-Javacool

P.S. If you have any problems please don't hesitate to post.

[Liquorbox]

checked for updates and was informed a new version (3.1) was available but link leads to and downloads 3.0 version-any suggestions?

[javacool]

{QUOTE-> quoting: Liquorbox link=board=34;threadid=27424;start=0#msg157447 date=1081389425]
checked for updates and was informed a new version (3.1) was available but link leads to and downloads 3.0 version-any suggestions?
<-QUOTE}

Please try this download site:

http://www.net-integration.net/tools/spywareblaster.html

If it still doesn't work trying pressing F5 or CTRL+F5 to refresh the page - it's possible your browser is caching an old version.

Best regards,

-Javacool

[snowbound]

I got mine from here,

http://www.ct7support.com/javacool/spywareblaster/download.html

I saw 3.0 at the other sites too but this link ::) did show 3.1. ;) ;D





snowbound

[Robin Hickman]

Hello! I tried to DL SWB-3.1, But it DL'ed v.3.0 (TWICE !!!). I hit the Ctrl+F5 before attempting the DL. It showed the DL page for 3.1, so I DL'ed it (after Un-Installing v.3.0, of course). After it went through the entire set-up, it showed as v.3.0 !!! After, deleting the program, and cache, and cookies, and recycle bin (etc.), I went through the whole procedure again!!!
Unfortunately, I ended up with the same results again!!! So, as it stands, I have a newly downloaded SWB v.3.0 with the last update showing as "3-28-04".
SO . . . . . . . . . . WHAT'S UP ? ? ?

Thank You for your help !

Robin20152

[TeMerc]

I had to completely remove the version 3.0 (Add/Remove)to install 3.1. I did not have to do this with the 3.0 version orignailly.
After removing 3.0, 3.1 installed with no problems.

[javacool]

{QUOTE-> quoting: Robin Hickman link=board=34;threadid=27424;start=0#msg157457 date=1081390522]
Hello! I tried to DL SWB-3.1, But it DL'ed v.3.0 (TWICE !!!). I hit the Ctrl+F5 before attempting the DL. It showed the DL page for 3.1, so I DL'ed it (after Un-Installing v.3.0, of course). After it went through the entire set-up, it showed as v.3.0 !!! After, deleting the program, and cache, and cookies, and recycle bin (etc.), I went through the whole procedure again!!!
Unfortunately, I ended up with the same results again!!! So, as it stands, I have a newly downloaded SWB v.3.0 with the last update showing as "3-28-04".
SO . . . . . . . . . . WHAT'S UP ? ? ?

Thank You for your help !

Robin20152
<-QUOTE}

Please try completely uninstalling the SpywareBlaster application.

Then, try to download the latest version directly from here:

http://www.javacoolsoftware.net/downloads/spywareblastersetup31.exe

Thanks,

-Javacool

[Robin Hickman]

Thank You! I'll give it a try. I did Go through the "Add/Delete" program on my computer before i attempted both downloads before. I don't know if I'll be able to complete the entire process again before this Board goes "dark".

Wish me luck !

Robin Hickman

[Robin Hickman]

H A P P Y - H A P P Y , J O Y - J O Y ! ! !

THANK YOU ! ! !

That worked GREAT !

When I saw the "31" in the download/set-up file, I knew I was home FREE !

{ Maybe putting the version number as part of the DL file would be a pretty good idea ALL the time ! }

Again, Thank You very much !

I look forward to the l o n g a w a i t e d update for SpyWareGuard sometime soon !!!

Robin Hickman

[Duane]

I had the same problem (tried 3 times from three different sites and got 3.0 all three times). I finally came here and found the correct link. Thanks for this site.

[10390bc]

Hi

Was wondering if before installing new version of Spyware Blaster 3.1, is it recommended that we first disable all protection for IE protection, restricted sites, & Firefox protection in v3.0 first? Then delete Spyware Blaster 3.0? Finally, Should we then also delete the Spyware Blaster 3.0 folder (if there is one after delete of 3.0)? Thanks so much.

[javacool]

{QUOTE-> quoting: 10390bc link=board=34;threadid=27424;start=0#msg157513 date=1081396078]
Hi

Was wondering if before installing new version of Spyware Blaster 3.1, is it recommended that we first disable all protection for IE protection, restricted sites, & Firefox protection in v3.0 first? Then delete Spyware Blaster 3.0? Finally, Should we then also delete the Spyware Blaster 3.0 folder (if there is one after delete of 3.0)? Thanks so much.
<-QUOTE}

I believe you'll find Upgrade Instructions at the bottom of the following page:

http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/sbupdate.html

Hope it helps. :)

-Javacool

[10390bc]

It did help Javacool. Thanks. I'm sure this new version will be another masterpiece, as all your material is :)

[Debra Webster]

I want to pay the $ 9.95 for a full year, since I have no way to pay but by check, I am going to mail a check to the address shown on this link, I have down loaded the new3.1, Thank you so much for it, I need to be able to get all updates. I had so much spywear on my computer, I had to do a clean sweep on my hard drive, and start all over again, the spywearBlaster has kept any more spywear from getting on my computer, so I am sywear free. again Thank you. 8)

[TheQuest]

Hi, Javacool

Thanks once again for Upgrade v3.01, Installed no Problem.

Wished I could pay something but as I have said before NOT with PayPal.

Please fine a way for us people who WILL not use PayPal?

Thanks again for all your hard work and great Programs.
TheQuest 8)

[JC2004]

Is it necessary to go to 3.1 from 3.0?

Can I stick with 3.0?

I just installed it on 5 computers and dont want to have to do it again if its not necessary. I dont use Mozilla.

JC

[javacool]

{QUOTE-> quoting: JC2004 link=board=34;threadid=27424;start=15#msg157535 date=1081399458]
Is it necessary to go to 3.1 from 3.0?

Can I stick with 3.0?

I just installed it on 5 computers and dont want to have to do it again if its not necessary. I dont use Mozilla.

JC
<-QUOTE}

Hi,

There are other bug fixes in the 3.1 version, including fixes in the Restricted Sites feature and updating. Plus some minor performance enhancements.

The way the programs are set up, you won't be able to get updates with the old 3.0 version, so updating is the only way to go. But I recommend updating anyway because of the reasons mentioned above. :)

Best regards,

-Javacool

[hayc59]

JavaCool, smooth as butter!!
thanks for your hard arse work on such
a needed item in this tough oh so tough life
of scum ware!! I/We owe you a debt of gratitude
thank you very mucho!!

[Claude LaFrenière]

Hi ! I was using Spyware Blaster Version 3.0 with no problem to protect
Mozilla-FireFox.
Surprise ! The new version3.1 do not reconized any Mozilla FireFox on my system... ???
Well ...may be the best is to reinstall v. 3.0.

::)

[javacool]

{QUOTE-> quoting: Claude LaFrenière link=board=34;threadid=27424;start=15#msg157540 date=1081400385]
Hi ! I was using Spyware Blaster Version 3.0 with no problem to protect
Mozilla-FireFox.
Surprise ! The new version3.1 do not reconized any Mozilla FireFox on my system... ???
Well ...may be the best is to reinstall v. 3.0.

::)


<-QUOTE}

What versions of Mozilla or Firefox are you using?

3.1 only supports Mozilla 1.7 and up, and Firefox 0.8 and up.

Best regards,

-Javacool

[JohnJohn]

I have win98, and installed version 3.1, but, it won't start: when I try to start it, there's a popup which says "unexpected error", and nothing else happens. The same thing happened with version 3.1, but not with previous versions.

[roshisan]

I just downloaded and insalled version3.1 which, unlike version3.0, ran like charm on win98SE.
It appears you have solved the problem of why version3.0 would not run on Win98, at least for my setup.
Thanks a gigabunch,
roshisan

[dp]

There appears to still be an issue with Firefox 0.8 protection.

On 1 machine running Mozilla 1.5, selecting protection created a hostperm.1 file in the Mozilla Profile folder.

On a different machine running Firefox 0.8, with protection enabled, there was no hostperm.1 file written anywhere.

Both machines running WinME.

[Unregistered]

Is there any place to get 3.0 back again? I keep getting an error 14 -out of string space pop up with the new version. Am running Win98se and pretty sure the problem is not lack of ram or hard drive. Had no problem with the earlier version. Also I am using Mozilla 1.7. Any suggestions would be really appreciated. I did a clean install of 3.1 as well. Hope I have given all the information someone might need to point me in the right direction. Thanks in advance. Linda

[Crossbow]

I'd earlier posted that SB 3.0 doesn't work (no GUI) on my Win98se PC.

Pleased to say that SB 3.1 works fine.

Thanks very much Javacool ;D

Best regards,
Gavin

[Jerry666]

[3.1 all i get is BSOD when it installs and tries to run . no luck .
win 98 se

[rogerwilco]

Not here! Poor v3.1 can't get past startup before Windows announces a "problem" which it doesn't specify. So 3.1 joins 3.0 as unusable in this machine: Mac 10.3.3/Virtual PC 6.1/WinXP with all updates installed. Yuk. Tried everything mentioned so far.
:(

[Khaine]

Thanks javacool :)

[basa]

Hmmm..........3.1 installed and runs fine on my W98SE with Avast, whereas 3.0 presented no GUI (but no other problems such as crashes BSOD etc.)

I did remove all protection and registry entries before un-installing 2.6.1 though...could be the solution ??

[manOFpeace]

Thank-you Javacool, I too would like a safe way to pay you for your hard work and great programme. ;)

[ghodgson]

Dear Java cool, Just to say Ver 3.1 is up and running on my Win XP AND Win 98 SE without any problems. Bug fixed!!
Thanks Gordon

[frebo]

3.1 works fine on this pc, but cant seem to find an update on 3.1 that i saw on another forum.

[ajg]

{QUOTE-> SpywareBlaster 3.1 has been released!

P.S. If you have any problems please don't hesitate to post. <-QUOTE}

Hi,

Just replaced SB-3.0 with 3.1. Now when I fire up SB it takes fully 13 minutes to load the protection data. The majority of the time is is taken up by loading the mozilla data.

Is this long loading time expected or have I done something wrong? 3.0 loading was much faster.

ENV: Win98se, Mozilla 1.6
Thanks

AJG

[javacool]

{QUOTE-> Hi,

Just replaced SB-3.0 with 3.1. Now when I fire up SB it takes fully 13 minutes to load the protection data. The majority of the time is is taken up by loading the mozilla data.

Is this long loading time expected or have I done something wrong? 3.0 loading was much faster.

ENV: Win98se, Mozilla 1.6
Thanks

AJG <-QUOTE}

Whoa! Something isn't right there.

When you say the majority of the time is spent when it's loading the mozilla data, is that as it is determining how many items are protected/unprotected? (i.e. after the green progress bar stops moving, but as the "Data loading..." messages are being replaced with "0 items unprotected")

Also, how many Mozilla profiles do you currently have? Have you created/removed lots of profiles?

Thanks,

-Javacool

[ajg]

Q: When you say the majority of the time is spent when it's loading the mozilla data, is that as it is determining how many items are protected/unprotected?
(i.e. after the green progress bar stops moving, but as the "Data loading..." messages are being replaced with "0 items unprotected")

A: Yes!

Q: Also, how many Mozilla profiles do you currently have?

A: One!

Q: Have you created/removed lots of profiles?

A: Have created and removed one.

AJG

[Unregistered]

I am running Win98 with 128 MB of memory. I followed instructions for running unprotect all and deinstalled 3.0. I installed 3.1. When I run I immediately get "runtime error 7, out of memory". Am I out of luck and need more memory on my system?

Thanks,

robert.harrison@sun.com


{QUOTE-> SpywareBlaster 3.1 has been released!

New in this version:
-Restricted Sites Protection
-Mozilla/Firefox Protection
-A brand-new interface
-And many, many other new features and changes!

This 3.1 release provides bug fixes and enhanced performance.
The Mozilla/Firefox protection should now correctly detect profiles for Mozilla 1.7 & Firefox 0.8 and up.

NEW UPDATING OPTIONS IN SPYWAREBLASTER 3.1
SpywareBlaster still offers the built-in Check for Updates feature. This feature is completely free and allows you to keep up-to-date by clicking on a button in the SpywareBlaster interface.

SpywareBlaster 3.1 now offers SpywareBlaster AutoUpdate - a brand-new updating solution. Just set it up, and AutoUpdate will check at every system boot for the latest updates and enable the newest protection (other options are available).

As much as we would like to provide auto-updating functionality for free, bandwidth costs are simply too great to make it feasible. AutoUpdate functionality is $9.95 (US) per year, which helps to cover the bandwidth costs. The Check for Updates function remains completely free, as does SpywareBlaster. You only need to pay if you wish to have the extra convenience of AutoUpdate.

Download the latest version here: http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster.html

Enjoy! ;D

Best regards,

-Javacool

P.S. If you have any problems please don't hesitate to post. <-QUOTE}

[javacool]

{QUOTE-> Q: When you say the majority of the time is spent when it's loading the mozilla data, is that as it is determining how many items are protected/unprotected?
(i.e. after the green progress bar stops moving, but as the "Data loading..." messages are being replaced with "0 items unprotected")

A: Yes!

Q: Also, how many Mozilla profiles do you currently have?

A: One!

Q: Have you created/removed lots of profiles?

A: Have created and removed one.

AJG <-QUOTE}

SpywareBlaster may take a bit to verify protection for Mozilla/Firefox, but it certainly shouldn't take 13 minutes. ???

A few more questions for you:
Have you ever installed a version of Firefox?
How fast is your computer's processor?

Can you also check under C:\Windows\Profiles\<username>\Application Data\Mozilla and see how large the registry.dat file is?
(At the same time, please check to see if "Firefox" and "Phoenix" folders exist under that Application Data folder.) Thanks! :)

EDIT: And a little notice: SpywareBlaster's Mozilla protection will only work with Mozilla 1.7 and up (not 1.6, unfortunately - there were some major changes in the 1.7 version, and since that will be the new long-lived stable branch I decided to go ahead and support it - there's a very stable beta version available now).

Best regards,

-Javacool

[ajg]

{QUOTE-> SpywareBlaster may take a bit to verify protection for Mozilla/Firefox, but it certainly shouldn't take 13 minutes. ???
-Javacool <-QUOTE}

Things have changed since last post.

First I deleted my netscape 7.1 thinking that this may be a problem. Mozilla 1.6 continued to work well.

Re-ran SB but this time it did not find Mozilla and thus no protection for it.

When SB was fired up it gave me a blank dialog box which persisted for about 4 minutes. Then it loaded IE and Restricted protection and did not detect Mozilla (1.6 at that time).

After reading you post I replaced M-1.6 with M-1.7b. I uninstalled and reinstalled SB. SB performace was the same as described above (4 minute wait before display and could not find mozilla 1.7b.

Then enabling "all" protection took the same 4 minutes and of course no Moziilla protection.

Now to respond:

Q: SpywareBlaster may take a bit to verify protection for Mozilla/Firefox, but it certainly shouldn't take 13 minutes. ???

A: Yes now it may be faster but Mozilla was not found.

Q: Have you ever installed a version of Firefox?

A: No.

Q: How fast is your computer's processor?

A: 800 MHz

Q: Can you also check under C:\Windows\Profiles\<username>\Application Data\Mozilla and see how large the registry.dat file is?

A: There is *no* registry.dat file there. Also C:\Windows...\<username> is the only folder and is different from the profile name being used by mozilla. ?????

Q:(At the same time, please check to see if "Firefox" and "Phoenix" folders exist under that Application Data folder.) Thanks! :)

A: No.

EDIT: And a little notice: SpywareBlaster's Mozilla protection will only work with Mozilla 1.7 and up (not 1.6, unfortunately - there were some major changes in the 1.7 version, and since that will be the new long-lived stable branch I decided to go ahead and support it - there's a very stable beta version available now).

Gottit - Diddit.

Many thanks.

Andy

[rogerwilco]

Javacool wrote:

{QUOTE-> SpywareBlaster 3.1 has been released!
If you have any problems please don't hesitate to post. <-QUOTE}

Well, here goes...again,

Neither 3.0 nor 3.1 will run on my XP system. Couldn't be because I'm running XP on Virtual PC for Mac (Mac OS 10.3.3). Old 2.6.1 worked fine.

The error message says only that Windows has encountered a "problem" with SB and has shut it down immediately. The details window adds nothing new.

I'm using the full retail version of XP Home. All protection is disabled and all previous evidence of SB trashed before installing 3.1 several times over before giving up again.

Any ideas would be most appreciated. SB is one essential program!

[javacool]

{QUOTE-> Javacool wrote:

Well, here goes...again,

Neither 3.0 nor 3.1 will run on my XP system. Couldn't be because I'm running XP on Virtual PC for Mac (Mac OS 10.3.3). Old 2.6.1 worked fine.

The error message says only that Windows has encountered a "problem" with SB and has shut it down immediately. The details window adds nothing new.

I'm using the full retail version of XP Home. All protection is disabled and all previous evidence of SB trashed before installing 3.1 several times over before giving up again.

Any ideas would be most appreciated. SB is one essential program! <-QUOTE}

Actually, the problem probably is caused by you running Win XP under Virtual PC for Mac.

Let me see if I can find a Mac machine around here (with Virtual PC), and test it out. I may be able to come up with a solution for you.

Best regards,

-Javacool

[Q Section]

INFORMATION ONLY


Old SpywareBlaster - no problems
3.0 - no problems
3.1 - no problems
98SE 450mHz/320RAM

[Robert Worrill]

{QUOTE-> SpywareBlaster 3.1 has been released!

New in this version:
-Restricted Sites Protection
-Mozilla/Firefox Protection
-A brand-new interface
-And many, many other new features and changes!

This 3.1 release provides bug fixes and enhanced performance.
The Mozilla/Firefox protection should now correctly detect profiles for Mozilla 1.7 & Firefox 0.8 and up.

NEW UPDATING OPTIONS IN SPYWAREBLASTER 3.1
SpywareBlaster still offers the built-in Check for Updates feature. This feature is completely free and allows you to keep up-to-date by clicking on a button in the SpywareBlaster interface.

SpywareBlaster 3.1 now offers SpywareBlaster AutoUpdate - a brand-new updating solution. Just set it up, and AutoUpdate will check at every system boot for the latest updates and enable the newest protection (other options are available).

As much as we would like to provide auto-updating functionality for free, bandwidth costs are simply too great to make it feasible. AutoUpdate functionality is $9.95 (US) per year, which helps to cover the bandwidth costs. The Check for Updates function remains completely free, as does SpywareBlaster. You only need to pay if you wish to have the extra convenience of AutoUpdate.

Download the latest version here: http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster.html

Enjoy! ;D

Best regards,

-Javacool

P.S. If you have any problems please don't hesitate to post. <-QUOTE}


Greetings All,

I just installed this latest version and since then I have been unable to log into my ICQ email. Is there any chance that this could have been caused by the new update? I have been trying now for four days to find out why I can't log on but to no avail. I am not at all sure that it is the update that is causing the problem but none of my other email sites, I have 5 more, are having any problems and I have cleared all the usual cookies, temp internet files and index.dat but nothing will allow me to log on! It seems that my computer may not be accepting the cookie from ICQ but I can't locate which one on the list in Spyware Blocker is causing the problem. Any help appreciated.

regards Rob.

[trparky]

May I ask what programming language it was developed it?

[masterwriter]

I just wondered why version 3 was updated to 3.1 so soon and will this be changed again soon. Nice interface. Had a small problem with 3 on updates once but then it worked fine and 3.1 runs the update fine but no updates are available. have defs 7 April. Is this the latest
Thanks for SB

[tgebling]

{QUOTE-> SpywareBlaster 3.1 has been released!

New in this version:
-Restricted Sites Protection
-Mozilla/Firefox Protection
-A brand-new interface
-And many, many other new features and changes!

This 3.1 release provides bug fixes and enhanced performance.
The Mozilla/Firefox protection should now correctly detect profiles for Mozilla 1.7 & Firefox 0.8 and up.

NEW UPDATING OPTIONS IN SPYWAREBLASTER 3.1
SpywareBlaster still offers the built-in Check for Updates feature. This feature is completely free and allows you to keep up-to-date by clicking on a button in the SpywareBlaster interface.

SpywareBlaster 3.1 now offers SpywareBlaster AutoUpdate - a brand-new updating solution. Just set it up, and AutoUpdate will check at every system boot for the latest updates and enable the newest protection (other options are available).

As much as we would like to provide auto-updating functionality for free, bandwidth costs are simply too great to make it feasible. AutoUpdate functionality is $9.95 (US) per year, which helps to cover the bandwidth costs. The Check for Updates function remains completely free, as does SpywareBlaster. You only need to pay if you wish to have the extra convenience of AutoUpdate.

Download the latest version here: http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster.html

Enjoy! ;D

Best regards,

-Javacool

P.S. If you have any problems please don't hesitate to post. <-QUOTE}


I am using version 3.1 now. It seems to be a very good software program. But I would like to offer one suggestion. It would be very helpfull if the program had a search function so a person could type in a name of a spyware threat like "cws.googlems.3" then the program would check and see if that spyware was in its data base and being blocked.

I am saying all this because I also use PestPatrol on my system. When I last ran that program it found "cws.googlems.3" on my computer, I removed it off my system, then went to SpywareBlaster to see if I would be protected from furture attacks. But their was no easy way to look through all the spyware that your program protests from. I still do not know if I am protected from "cws.googlems.3".

You are providing a very much needed service to us internet users, keep up the good work!

[ajg]

{QUOTE->
Can you also check under C:\Windows\Profiles\<username>\Application Data\Mozilla and see how large the registry.dat file is?
-Javacool <-QUOTE}


Recently I said that I did not have have registry.dat file. However I finally found it in a different location:

C:\Windows\Application Data\mozilla\registry.dat size = 40,697 kB.

Does anay of this mean anything?

AJG

[Veronica]

Well..it looks to me like my Spywareblaster career is over

I didn't realise I had to uninstall my 2.6 first, and I got an error message saying
that either my hard drive was damaged, or there was a virus around

Then I thought.."maybe I should have uninstalled first"
So I used 'add/remove'
Then installed 3.1
Same error message

I re-installed 2.6 (but of course the database is way old, and of course, I now cannot update, unless I use 3.1)
2.6 opened normally, as I have come to rely on

One attempt at loading 3.1 was successful without the error message, until I tried to open it the following day, to update the database

Grrrrrrr!!
I DETEST progress!!!
I wish geniuses would allow me to keep using 2.6 forever, and leave me alone in my bliss!

Veronica

[TheApostate]

Well, javacool, I've downloaded and installed the latest version and like it so far. It's a very different version to the earleir incarnations, but in a nice way :)

TheApostate

[petersil]

I had no issues with any past releases, including 3.0, but ver. 3.1 DOES NOT recognize Mozilla (1.6) or Firefox, so the protection is disabled. How about a fix?????? :'(

[ajg]

{QUOTE-> I had no issues with any past releases, including 3.0, but ver. 3.1 DOES NOT recognize Mozilla (1.6) or Firefox, so the protection is disabled. How about a fix?????? :'( <-QUOTE}


I had same problem - You need to update Mozilla to 1.7b.

Cheers,

AJG

[ajg]

{QUOTE->
Can you also check under C:\Windows\Profiles\<username>\Application Data\Mozilla and see how large the registry.dat file is?
-Javacool <-QUOTE}


At Last!! After all my posts All is well.

One of the problems was a huuuuge registry.dat file.

Everything wonderful. Definately y'all deserve a donation.

Cheers,

AJG

[rogerwilco]

{QUOTE-> Actually, the problem probably is caused by you running Win XP under Virtual PC for Mac.

Let me see if I can find a Mac machine around here (with Virtual PC), and test it out. I may be able to come up with a solution for you.

Best regards,

-Javacool <-QUOTE}

That would be great! Thanks.

[Robert Worrill]

{QUOTE-> Greetings All,

I just installed this latest version and since then I have been unable to log into my ICQ email. Is there any chance that this could have been caused by the new update? I have been trying now for four days to find out why I can't log on but to no avail. I am not at all sure that it is the update that is causing the problem but none of my other email sites, I have 5 more, are having any problems and I have cleared all the usual cookies, temp internet files and index.dat but nothing will allow me to log on! It seems that my computer may not be accepting the cookie from ICQ but I can't locate which one on the list in Spyware Blocker is causing the problem. Any help appreciated.

regards Rob. <-QUOTE}

Subsequent to the last post I have now had the chance to log in from my work computer and there is no problem. I really do think that SpywareBlaster has caused me to be unable to log on to ICQmail. It will be a problem for anyone using the ICQemail site and SWBlaster, I have tried disabling all protection etc, but still cannot get in. Anyone got any ideas?

[Robert Worrill]

{QUOTE-> Subsequent to the last post I have now had the chance to log in from my work computer and there is no problem. I really do think that SpywareBlaster has caused me to be unable to log on to ICQmail. It will be a problem for anyone using the ICQemail site and SWBlaster, I have tried disabling all protection etc, but still cannot get in. Anyone got any ideas? <-QUOTE}

Hmm, I have reread my post and realized that I have not made it clear that it is my home computer that is faulty. I have a dual boot Win98SE and Win2k with the latest version of SWBlaster on each, I am now virtually certain that it is this latest version that has caused the problem certainly the last version worked fine. Only Icqmail is unattainable, I use 5 other sites. I have checked my Hosts file and tried everything I can think of. Soon I will un-install SWBlaster if no-one comes up with a solution.

[Olivier]

Hi !
I was using Spyware Blaster Version 3.0 with no problem to protect
Mozilla-FireFox 0.8. But the new version3.1 do not reconized any Mozilla FireFox 0.8 on my system...

I try to uninstalled and reinstalled Mozilla/firefox 0.8 without more success and I also try the same with spyware blaster 3.1 (uninstalled and reinstalled) with no more luck???

What's the problem with this version should I reinstalled v 3.0 (wich didn't have that kind of problem)???

My system is Windows XP

Thank you for your helps,

[javacool]

{QUOTE-> Hmm, I have reread my post and realized that I have not made it clear that it is my home computer that is faulty. I have a dual boot Win98SE and Win2k with the latest version of SWBlaster on each, I am now virtually certain that it is this latest version that has caused the problem certainly the last version worked fine. Only Icqmail is unattainable, I use 5 other sites. I have checked my Hosts file and tried everything I can think of. Soon I will un-install SWBlaster if no-one comes up with a solution. <-QUOTE}

Hi,

If you disabled SpywareBlaster's protection there should have been nothing left on your system that could have even potentially caused such a conflict, so I would suspect SpywareBlaster is not the cause here.

Have you installed or configured anything else recently?

Thanks,

-Javacool

[pappy]

;D 2.4 GHZ., P-4, 512 MB ram, HP home, IE 6, NAV, Spybot 1.2 and Spywareblaster 3.1
Just downloaded Spywareblaster ver.3.1 with updates and did not uninstall previous version first.......................ALL is well!{QUOTE-> SpywareBlaster 3.1 has been released!

New in this version:
-Restricted Sites Protection
-Mozilla/Firefox Protection
-A brand-new interface
-And many, many other new features and changes!

This 3.1 release provides bug fixes and enhanced performance.
The Mozilla/Firefox protection should now correctly detect profiles for Mozilla 1.7 & Firefox 0.8 and up.

NEW UPDATING OPTIONS IN SPYWAREBLASTER 3.1
SpywareBlaster still offers the built-in Check for Updates feature. This feature is completely free and allows you to keep up-to-date by clicking on a button in the SpywareBlaster interface.

SpywareBlaster 3.1 now offers SpywareBlaster AutoUpdate - a brand-new updating solution. Just set it up, and AutoUpdate will check at every system boot for the latest updates and enable the newest protection (other options are available).

As much as we would like to provide auto-updating functionality for free, bandwidth costs are simply too great to make it feasible. AutoUpdate functionality is $9.95 (US) per year, which helps to cover the bandwidth costs. The Check for Updates function remains completely free, as does SpywareBlaster. You only need to pay if you wish to have the extra convenience of AutoUpdate.

Download the latest version here: http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster.html

Enjoy! ;D

Best regards,

-Javacool

P.S. If you have any problems please don't hesitate to post. <-QUOTE}

[Robert Worrill]

{QUOTE-> Hi,

If you disabled SpywareBlaster's protection there should have been nothing left on your system that could have even potentially caused such a conflict, so I would suspect SpywareBlaster is not the cause here.

Have you installed or configured anything else recently?

Thanks,

-Javacool <-QUOTE}
Right, a number of times I have disabled all of the protection and then gone into Restricted Sites and found that I cannot delete the sites there, they always come back, I think these are the restricted sites from SWBlaster. I have two operating systems exhibiting the same problem although they are on separate partitions on the hard drive, I installed the new version of SWBlaster on both of them, then the problem started. The only new thing I have installed, and that is on only one partition is Jumbled Letters. Anyway no rush, I don't see why you can't open an ICQ email and see if you have the problem, I will attempt to put SWBlaster onto another computer that still gets into my ICQ email and see if it causes the problem.

I am in no real hurry to fix this although it is inconvenient not to be able to use the account from my home computer.

Regards Robert.

[Parputt]

Wondering if a small annoyance could be addressed. After updating one has to go into each XP profile to "enable all protection". Would it be possible for a future product update to address this and make it so when you "enable all protection" it is across the board and not just for the profile you are currently on? Thanks.

[TimHack]

Have a WIN98 system, which ran SB 3 (and previous versions) fine. Uninstalled SB 3, installed 3.1 and now when I try to run SB I only get a blank main SB page. Disk is humming away, but nothing happens. Task mgr shows SB as "not responding". Have downloaded and installed the missing and other files suggested by the SB FAQs but the above problems still persist.

[JTT]

{QUOTE-> Have a WIN98 system, which ran SB 3 (and previous versions) fine. Uninstalled SB 3, installed 3.1 and now when I try to run SB I only get a blank main SB page. Disk is humming away, but nothing happens. Task mgr shows SB as "not responding". Have downloaded and installed the missing and other files suggested by the SB FAQs but the above problems still persist. <-QUOTE}

Exact same symptoms running Win98SE

[javacool]

{QUOTE-> Have a WIN98 system, which ran SB 3 (and previous versions) fine. Uninstalled SB 3, installed 3.1 and now when I try to run SB I only get a blank main SB page. Disk is humming away, but nothing happens. Task mgr shows SB as "not responding". Have downloaded and installed the missing and other files suggested by the SB FAQs but the above problems still persist. <-QUOTE}

Hi,

Do you have the Mozilla, Netscape, or Firefox browsers installed?

Thanks,

-Javacool

[Rogue_Hunter]

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimHack
Have a WIN98 system, which ran SB 3 (and previous versions) fine. Uninstalled SB 3, installed 3.1 and now when I try to run SB I only get a blank main SB page. Disk is humming away, but nothing happens. Task mgr shows SB as "not responding". Have downloaded and installed the missing and other files suggested by the SB FAQs but the above problems still persist.



Yeah Same problem with me too, am running Windows 98 as well, but I do have Netscape 7.0 installed.

[javacool]

{QUOTE->
Yeah Same problem with me too, am running Windows 98 as well, but I do have Netscape 7.0 installed. <-QUOTE}

Ahah! That would probably be the cause of the problem.

I've had a few other reports of problems when Netscape 7.x is installed. I'm trying to work on a solution now. :)

Best regards,

-Javacool

[diboja]

I have windows 98SE and have used Spywareblaster(Great Product) for quite a long period of time - I have never had any problems until version 3.1. I have hispeed cable connection (sorry to join the list of folks having problems)

I use Netscape 7 and also IE 6 Browsers....
Tried all download sites with both browsers - didn't download.
Finally using Net 7 It downloaded after 14-15 minutes.
Install took about 20 minutes
To load protection took about 20-25 minutes

Now it won't work - I get a white window which will load after about 19-20 minutes and spyblaster appears but nothing will work.

I have uninstalled and will be checking in on the forums to see if anything gets resolved.

[romeroom]

I have been having difficulty manually updating since upgrading to 3.0 then subsequently 3.1. When I try to check for updates I consistently get, "Error connecting to update server." This happens no matter what time of day or night, everytime.

I have a broadband connection to the internet via a router.


{QUOTE-> SpywareBlaster 3.1 has been released!

New in this version:
-Restricted Sites Protection
-Mozilla/Firefox Protection
-A brand-new interface
-And many, many other new features and changes!

This 3.1 release provides bug fixes and enhanced performance.
The Mozilla/Firefox protection should now correctly detect profiles for Mozilla 1.7 & Firefox 0.8 and up.

NEW UPDATING OPTIONS IN SPYWAREBLASTER 3.1
SpywareBlaster still offers the built-in Check for Updates feature. This feature is completely free and allows you to keep up-to-date by clicking on a button in the SpywareBlaster interface.

SpywareBlaster 3.1 now offers SpywareBlaster AutoUpdate - a brand-new updating solution. Just set it up, and AutoUpdate will check at every system boot for the latest updates and enable the newest protection (other options are available).

As much as we would like to provide auto-updating functionality for free, bandwidth costs are simply too great to make it feasible. AutoUpdate functionality is $9.95 (US) per year, which helps to cover the bandwidth costs. The Check for Updates function remains completely free, as does SpywareBlaster. You only need to pay if you wish to have the extra convenience of AutoUpdate.

Download the latest version here: http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster.html

Enjoy! ;D

Best regards,

-Javacool

P.S. If you have any problems please don't hesitate to post. <-QUOTE}

[Ian Bartlett]

I have Win95 and IE5. I updated 2.6.1 to 3.0 by installing 3.0 over 2.6.1(without uninstalling) with success and I have now updated 3.0 to 3.1 by the same method. It all seems fine. I notice you recommend uninstallation of 3.0 before installing 3.1. Is there a reason this time and have I done something wrong?

[frazky]

"Error while unpacking program, code 4. Please report to author."
I have IE6 and 3.1vsn.. Running Win98 updated...

previous versions no problems.. please help asap.

[curiousmark]

Problem with WinME.

Hi,

V.3.0 was working great on my WinMe laptop. To update, I uninstalled v. 3.0 first. Then installed v. 3.1. The GUI is blank and I end up having to use Ctrl-Alt-Del to end the task from the Task Manager.

Let me know when a fix is found.

Thanks!

Also: where can I get version 3.0 to install in the meanwhile?

[javacool]

{QUOTE-> "Error while unpacking program, code 4. Please report to author."
I have IE6 and 3.1vsn.. Running Win98 updated...

previous versions no problems.. please help asap. <-QUOTE}

Hi,

This will be fixed as soon as possible.

When you say the previous version caused no problems, do you mean 3.0?

Best regards,

-Javacool

[TimHack]

{QUOTE-> Hi,

Do you have the Mozilla, Netscape, or Firefox browsers installed?

Thanks,

-Javacool <-QUOTE}

Am using Netscape 7.1; and IE 6 w. latest patches. SB 3.1 was downloaded through IE.

SB 3.1 eventually came up, when I let it run, and enabled all protection after about 13 minutes. Still takes about that long to start up fully whenever I run it.

registry file (Windows/Application Data/Mozilla) is about 35MB.

There is one profile in the Mozilla folder.

[ohman]

How do i know that spyware blaster 3.1 has detected my firefox 0.8 profile, because spyware blaster is not blocking any cookies in firefox it claims to protect against even after the mozilla/firefox protection is enabled.

[javacool]

{QUOTE-> Am using Netscape 7.1; and IE 6 w. latest patches. SB 3.1 was downloaded through IE.

SB 3.1 eventually came up, when I let it run, and enabled all protection after about 13 minutes. Still takes about that long to start up fully whenever I run it.

registry file (Windows/Application Data/Mozilla) is about 35MB.

There is one profile in the Mozilla folder. <-QUOTE}

That registry.dat file is rediculously huge! Something isn't right there, and I'm fairly certain Netscape is the cause. ???

Would it be possible for you to open that file in Notepad or Wordpad, and select the first 100 or so lines to send to bugreports@javacoolsoftware.com ? (Obviously I won't be able to accept the whole 35 MB file, but I'd like to see the first couple hundred lines if possible.) Thanks! :)

Best regards,

-Javacool

[Arphaxat]

Just wanted to tell you that your very prog SpywareBlaster is the very very coolest software on earth that's been created in the last few years. First, a big (cannot be big enough:-) thankyou fellow.

It may sound a bit exaggerated, but to me you're quite a genius and a very smooth one.

I am using SpywareBlaster since (almost since) it's very first publishing date.
And I've changed my PC's and operating systems twice since then.

It all works beautifully, and I think your idea of having only to pay for automatically scheduled updating could well have been a hint at some commercial antivirus software producers...Still, there is one, and if I'm right, a not so very bad one. :-) I really don't want to advertise somebody but there is one: (hit me) of course you all might know it already, but I think this is the time and place:

http://www.avup.de/personal/en/avwinsfx.exe

Altough this is principally a commercial company, I appreciate that forestep into not have to pay and still get actual databases.

That is kind of weird in our days.

Thank you (both) so much.

And (repeating some other user's question):

will there be an updated version of SpywareGuard as well?

I am sure it would become another opus magnum on the scene....

Thank you and now...good night

[napalmnthemorning]

No problems also with 3.0 but 3.1 also gives me the error when trying to update. I thought it might be due to running Opera 7.5. I'm running XP Pro, P-4, 2.4 ghz, 1gig Ram. Personally I preferred 3.0 better then 3.1. because it was plain and simple. 3.1 seems to be more clumsy and glitsy. Nothing personal javacool, just offering some constructive criticism.

Thanks.

IOWA

[javacool]

{QUOTE-> No problems also with 3.0 but 3.1 also gives me the error when trying to update. I thought it might be due to running Opera 7.5. I'm running XP Pro, P-4, 2.4 ghz, 1gig Ram. Personally I preferred 3.0 better then 3.1. because it was plain and simple. 3.1 seems to be more clumsy and glitsy. Nothing personal javacool, just offering some constructive criticism.

Thanks.

IOWA <-QUOTE}

Hi,

Would you mind posting the exact contents of the error message that is being displayed? And does it appear when trying to use the Check for Updates feature in the program, or when you try to run the updated version of SpywareBlaster? (3.1)

Thanks. :)

Best regards,

-Javacool

[Silver Ninja]

Hi Newbie here,Every time I click on links for javacoolsoftware.net/downloads/spyware (from this thread) or try to download avast anti virus or spyware blaster or even mynapster i get the same http 403 error (forbidden).


Its probably something simple (like me) but I'm ready to sell this thing already!

Cheers Silver Ninja (England)

[wattru]

{QUOTE-> SpywareBlaster 3.1 has been released!

New in this version:
-Restricted Sites Protection
-Mozilla/Firefox Protection
-A brand-new interface
-And many, many other new features and changes!

This 3.1 release provides bug fixes and enhanced performance.
The Mozilla/Firefox protection should now correctly detect profiles for Mozilla 1.7 & Firefox 0.8 and up.

NEW UPDATING OPTIONS IN SPYWAREBLASTER 3.1
SpywareBlaster still offers the built-in Check for Updates feature. This feature is completely free and allows you to keep up-to-date by clicking on a button in the SpywareBlaster interface.

SpywareBlaster 3.1 now offers SpywareBlaster AutoUpdate - a brand-new updating solution. Just set it up, and AutoUpdate will check at every system boot for the latest updates and enable the newest protection (other options are available).

As much as we would like to provide auto-updating functionality for free, bandwidth costs are simply too great to make it feasible. AutoUpdate functionality is $9.95 (US) per year, which helps to cover the bandwidth costs. The Check for Updates function remains completely free, as does SpywareBlaster. You only need to pay if you wish to have the extra convenience of AutoUpdate.

Download the latest version here: http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster.html

Enjoy! ;D

Best regards,

-Javacool

P.S. If you have any problems please don't hesitate to post. <-QUOTE}

I have seen my problem mentioned earlier, but cannot seem to find any replies addressing this exact problem. My 3.0 version worked perfectly, but 3.1 gives me a message "Run-time error '14'. Out of string space" when I try to open it. I then click "OK" and the program closes. As a result some rather nasty spyware was installed on my C drive last week. Luckily my Spybot program is working correctly and it was able to detect and delete the offending files.

I am running Win98se, 1.6 AMD processor, 512MB ram. I use Netscape 7.0 and Internet Explorer 6.0. I also had an old version of Netscape 4.7 installed and I have uninstalled it in an attempt to clear up this problem but this made no difference. My registry.dat file is a WHOPPING 182MB!!! I can't even open it - wordpad attempts to read the file, but when it reaches about 20 or 21% it starts over at 0% and ultimately I have to control-alt-delete (it shows that wordpad is not responding) and "end task". Earlier posts do not make it clear if it is safe to delete the registry.dat file.

Please help if you can! I was so happy with the 3.0 version, now I feel lost!

[snowbound]

Hi wattru :)

Welcome to Wilders.

Take a look at this thread,

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=27587

Might be a good idea to also follow the Javacool instructions there. ;)

Hope this helps.


snowbound

[wattru]

{QUOTE-> Hi wattru :)

Welcome to Wilders.

Take a look at this thread,

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=27587

Might be a good idea to also follow the Javacool instructions there. ;)

Hope this helps.


snowbound <-QUOTE}

;D THANKS snowbound!!!

[alanzimmerman]

What are the system requirements for Spyware Blaster and your other products? They all look good. If this is on your website somehow I missed it.

Alan Zimmerman

[le_charmant22]

{QUOTE-> Hi !
I was using Spyware Blaster Version 3.0 with no problem to protect
Mozilla-FireFox 0.8. But the new version3.1 do not reconized any Mozilla FireFox 0.8 on my system...

I try to uninstalled and reinstalled Mozilla/firefox 0.8 without more success and I also try the same with spyware blaster 3.1 (uninstalled and reinstalled) with no more luck???

What's the problem with this version should I reinstalled v 3.0 (wich didn't have that kind of problem)???

My system is Windows XP

Thank you for your helps, <-QUOTE}

i've got the same problem to you & i did the same things to & still waiting for response!

[Skikter]

I was running 2.6 for the longest time without any problems, and once I installed 3.1 now I get multiple pop-ups nearly everytime I close a browser. Any suggestions? I didn't realize this was the problem until I installed 3.1 on one of my other computers and the same problem I have on my laptop immediately started happening on this computer.

[javacool]

{QUOTE-> I was running 2.6 for the longest time without any problems, and once I installed 3.1 now I get multiple pop-ups nearly everytime I close a browser. Any suggestions? I didn't realize this was the problem until I installed 3.1 on one of my other computers and the same problem I have on my laptop immediately started happening on this computer. <-QUOTE}

Hi,

Exactly what are those pop-ups? Error messages? And what do they say?

Thanks,

-Javacool

[Skikter]

The pop-ups are from Fastclick.edgesuite.net & manipulatingthesurface.com both refer on to casalmedia.com One is offering screensavers or smileys the other is selling luggage.

[Olivier]

{QUOTE-> i've got the same problem to you & i did the same things to & still waiting for response! <-QUOTE}

Hi le charmant22,

The only answer I receive concerning this problem is that maybe the cause will be the fact that my windows XP is in French??? But I still doesn't understand why I have this problem with this version (3.1) since the spywareblaster 3.0 didn't have this kind of problem.

By the way my problem isn't solve yet either ;-)

[cprochas]

The new version just gives me a blank window with a message stating that Spywareblaster is not responding. (I did uninstall 3.0) I have Windows ME. Help!

[not given]

I am recieving a number of errors with SpywareBlaster 3.1

When I launch spywareblaster I recieve the error:

"Unexpected Error"

When I launch spwareblaster autoupdate I recieve the error:

"run-time error '50003':
Unexpected error"

[Blaster_fan]

Version 3.1 is working great. Installed perfectly on my 200MGZ PEN 1 (Yes MGZ) WIN XP PRO Machine with 128 RAM. Great program. THANKS!!!!!

[Heli Bass]

I got the "Error while unpacking program, code 4. Please report to author." message. So I am reporting it. I noticed another person got it a week ago and it is being addressed. Any idea on the time frame?

System here is an AMD 900 Duron, Win98SE, 256 megs memory, IE 6.

If any other info is needed, just let me know.

Thanks

Keith

[Prince_Serendip]

I'm waiting for 3.2. ;)

[xcop]

{QUOTE-> Well..it looks to me like my Spywareblaster career is over

I didn't realise I had to uninstall my 2.6 first, and I got an error message saying
that either my hard drive was damaged, or there was a virus around

Then I thought.."maybe I should have uninstalled first"
So I used 'add/remove'
Then installed 3.1
Same error message

I re-installed 2.6 (but of course the database is way old, and of course, I now cannot update, unless I use 3.1)
2.6 opened normally, as I have come to rely on

One attempt at loading 3.1 was successful without the error message, until I tried to open it the following day, to update the database

Grrrrrrr!!
I DETEST progress!!!
I wish geniuses would allow me to keep using 2.6 forever, and leave me alone in my bliss!

Veronica <-QUOTE}
I am having the same error messages whenever I try to run spywareblaster. I did uninstall the previous version, but, I am unable to run the program. It installs just fine. I am using win 2k professional. If anyone out ther has any ideas, please help.

[rondownie]

I can't open SpywareBlaster 3.1 after download. Attempting to open, I get message: "This program has been damaged, possibly by a bad sector of the hard drive or a virus. Please reinstall it." Upon reinstall, same message appears.

[dangitall]

{QUOTE-> I can't open SpywareBlaster 3.1 after download. Attempting to open, I get message: "This program has been damaged, possibly by a bad sector of the hard drive or a virus. Please reinstall it." Upon reinstall, same message appears. <-QUOTE}

Rondownie - go HERE (http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=15913) and follow the directions given. This may or may not help clear this problem.

[Debugnus]

I have SB 3.1.. it works great at the moment I think...
But, when I try the update button It will not connect to the update at all...
I even have ADSL BroadBand and cannot update...
I love this proggy so please fix him fast.. the poor lil proggy is sick i think...
he needs help LOL


..::Bugs::..

[Teddy]

{QUOTE-> Rondownie - go HERE (http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=15913) and follow the directions given. This may or may not help clear this problem. <-QUOTE}

I got the same ERROR message as some others:

"This program has been damaged, possibly by a bad sector of the hard drive or a virus. Please reinstall it."

My computer have no viruses/trojans or other problems...or maybe it has!

Any more ideas somebody??
Best wishes
Ted

[tyfris]

{QUOTE-> I can't open SpywareBlaster 3.1 after download. Attempting to open, I get message: "This program has been damaged, possibly by a bad sector of the hard drive or a virus. Please reinstall it." Upon reinstall, same message appears. <-QUOTE}

I have the same problem. What can we do ?

[centauro]

Dear Javacool:
I've uninstalled first the Spywareblaster 2.6.1 and then I downloaded the Sp. 3.1 and a message appears as this : "the file is damaged; may be a virus or another problem". I run by Windows 98 SE. I have read the problem probably would be the Windows 98, I dont know.
Please send me an answer and a solution for me. My e-mail is:
27931jf@comb.es

From Spain,
Jorge.
Thank you very much.

[Peaches4U]

Well for what it is worth ... uninstalled the 2.1 version without a problem, installed 3.1 - all is well and running smoothly [touch wood, so far!]. No problem getting the updates either. Am running WindowsXP, 512RAM and 100GB Hard-drive, on high speed cable; Avast 4 Home Ed.; ZAP; new version of SpyBot; Ad-Aware, spywareguard; IE-Spyad; IE - no conflicts detected so far. 8) Just thought you might like to hear from someone that is thumbs up!

[Teddy]

{QUOTE-> I got the same ERROR message as some others:

"This program has been damaged, possibly by a bad sector of the hard drive or a virus. Please reinstall it."

My computer have no viruses/trojans or other problems...or maybe it has!

Any more ideas somebody??
Best wishes
Ted <-QUOTE}

My god, there is something fishy going on in my computer after all. I'll try the suggestion made by "dangitall" as well. Tell you what happens soon.

Boy, have this been a scary week for me. First my cell phone was stolen, then I lost my car keys, my knee hurts terribly after playing floorhockey the other day and now, my girlfriend is going to leave me, at least that's what she says if I don't stop playing with my computer trying to solve some silly "bad sector.. or virus thing" .

[andyg95128]

I've got 3.0 installed on my system and I can't download 3.1 from any of the available sites. The installation phase always stops with the following error message: "An error occurred while trying to replace the esisting file: DeleteFile failed; Code 5. Access is denied."

So, what do I do?

Thanks for your help.[/FONT]

[snowbound]

Hi andyg95128 :)

Welcome to Wilders.

This link should help u,

http://www.javacoolsoftware.info/kb/idx/0/001/article/


snowbound

[tyfris]

Still the same problem : "This program has been damaged, possibly by a bad sector of the hard drive or a virus. Please reinstall it."
I followed the hijackthis procedure indicated before for another purpose without outcome.
So my question is:
- is there any way to download the old version (I have deleted it) ?
- if not is there a substituable freeware availlable ?
Thanks from a spywareblaster orphan !

[javacool]

{QUOTE-> Still the same problem : "This program has been damaged, possibly by a bad sector of the hard drive or a virus. Please reinstall it."
I followed the hijackthis procedure indicated before for another purpose without outcome.
<-QUOTE}

Hi,

I'm very close to a solution for this - please hang on, it shouldn't be too much longer. :)

Best regards,

-Javacool

[Blastercrap]

I just downloaded mine and it has files missing ...

I dont think any program that doesnt have a good support team shouldnt be on the net..

This is self help group crap.. no way .. none of you made the program so how would you truely know how it runs ..

Iam going to see if something legal cant be done about this...

[LowWaterMark]

The files the are missing are probably those needed to complete the Visual Basic Runtime environment, or a couple files that need properly registration. These are documented on the FAQ page right on the main SpywareBlaster site itself. See this page:

http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/downloadfaq.html

These files are not included in the SpywareBlaster kit as they are available from Microsoft or other places, and they are best pulled directly from them, though Javacool does provide a needed files kit, too.

[javacool]

{QUOTE-> I just downloaded mine and it has files missing ...
<-QUOTE}

Hi,

Depending on the file that you are missing, I'm fairly certain that the answer can be found on this page:

http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/downloadfaq.html

Best regards,

-Javacool

P.S. I did indeed make the program.

[bigc73542]

{QUOTE-> P.S. I did indeed make the program <-QUOTE}

And a very good program it is .

[spyblaster crap]

Ow I thought I would add .. I have emailed most tech shows to spread the word not to promote this program..

Crap programers should be in jail .. anyone who makes a program and doesnt back it up .. something is wrong

[dog]

{QUOTE-> I just downloaded mine and it has files missing ...

I dont think any program that doesnt have a good support team shouldnt be on the net..

This is self help group crap.. no way .. none of you made the program so how would you truely know how it runs ..

Iam going to see if something legal cant be done about this... <-QUOTE}

Hi B......C....., :)

Javacool has proved all of us FOR FREE so many great proggies ... Which we are thankful for! In the post about yours he mentions that he almost has a fix. We are thankfully to all that provide programs to enhance our security ... you should be more gracious as well. I'm sorry your frustrated ... but your response is haste ... be patient or you'll miss out on a great proggy ... thanks to Javacool.

As for the self help remark ... Wilders is a wonderfully place to be ... help is all around ... and done so volentarily ...

dog - *puppy* ;)

[LowWaterMark]

Guest - I'm sorry, but have you even read these posts here? It is all explained and this is the official support forum, which is backing up this free program.

[dog]

Everyone beat me to it ... I wish I could type with more than two fingers ;D

dog - *puppy*

edit - and LWM twice ... LOL ;D

[etalmar]

I do not like the 3.1 version of SpywareBlaster. Version 2.6.1 was MUCH better and did not have the slick commercial fluff GUI that 3.1 does. Not going to complain too very much, as the proggie is a freebie, but I have been using it since version 2 and sadly, recently decided to delete version 3.1, as it was causing certain web sites to hang, or load erratically, which tells me there are still a lot of bugs in this *new* version?!

I also tried and subsequently deleted SpywareGuard, as it has the same problem, in that it always seems to operate very erratically on Win98SE.

I would never upgrade to XP, as it's **Crap/Spy/Mal/Intrusive-ware to the extreme!

[Delgado]

Can anyone tell me if Spyware Blaster works with Opera Browser? Or am I wasting my time installing it?

::) ::)

[DestroyedBrain]

i use Win XP, Mozilla/Firefox, NAV 2k4 pro, S&D 1.2, SB 3.1 and have no Problems


THNX JC 4 SB

[Q Section]

{QUOTE-> ....recently decided to delete version 3.1, as it was causing certain web sites to hang, or load erratically, which tells me there are still a lot of bugs in this *new* version?!

I also tried and subsequently deleted SpywareGuard, as it has the same problem, in that it always seems to operate very erratically on Win98SE.... <-QUOTE}
etalmar
It seems your 98SE system quite possibly has a few problems of which you have not learned. This 98SE system runs just fine with SpywareBlaster, SpywareGuard and many other programs running at the same time AND only 50% system resources free even as this is being written! Just let us know your particulars and perhaps someone here can assist. :)

Be seeing you

[firehawk]

...but it appears a few users need fixing. "Bad programmers belong in jail"...gimme a break. You belong in an asylum for thinking that somebody providing an awesome tool for free should be jailed just because you don't know how to fix your own system's OS problems.

I do have a question, though. In a previous thread, instructions were given for downloading manual updates to 2.6.1. Well, the download location where those files reside now contains some compressed, encrypted, and/or corrupted files.

Where can I now get manual updates for 3.1 Our firewall blocks the in-program update, and I've tried all the options in SpywareBlaster.

Mike

[dqa]

Hi,

Just read this thread with some amazement, and not a little horror...

So:

Javacool, it needs saying: SpywareBlaster is a great FREE programme, and the vast majority of we who use it DO appreciate your fine work on our behalf.

May coffee and programming keep on coming your way... 8)

best,

Chris H.

;D

[snowbound]

{QUOTE->

I do have a question, though. In a previous thread, instructions were given for downloading manual updates to 2.6.1. Well, the download location where those files reside now contains some compressed, encrypted, and/or corrupted files.

Where can I now get manual updates for 3.1 Our firewall blocks the in-program update, and I've tried all the options in SpywareBlaster.

Mike <-QUOTE}

Manual updates coming right up, ;)

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=12266


snowbound

[renegado]

I got the same ERROR message as some others:

"This program has been damaged, possibly by a bad sector of the hard drive or a virus. Please reinstall it."

My computer have no viruses/trojans or other problems...or maybe it has! ???

Any more ideas somebody?? ::)

Renegado
http://mipagina.cantv.net/dataven927/fantasma35.jpg

[frizzie]

Hi:

I d/l and installed SB ver 3.1, restarted my comp, clicked on the SB icon and computer hung. I d/l first patch, restarted comp, clicked on icon and computer hung. I d/l second patch, restarted comp, clicked on icon and you guessed it, computer hung but this time I could end task. I then disabled Norton's personal firewall and anti virus software, clicked on SB icon and again computer hung. Each time SB opened but I got a box with white screen -- No Gui and no error messages. So a box opens with nothing in it and I have to end task.

Only thing I can do now is to uninstall the program unless someone has more suggestions. As I mentioned in the title I am running win98se (on a PentII/400 with 384 RAM).

Thanx

[bogie7129]

I haven't seen this problem discussed yet, so I'll lay it out for assistance:

I used 2.6.1 with no problems. I dl 3.1 with no problems. I took the snapshot of my system before I starting monkeying around with it, then made some changes. Restarted the computer, with no problems, but could not access the internet. Clicked on "restore to original settings" button and restarted the computer again, but still no joy. Even though I tried to get back to the original configuration, it didn't work. I installed 3.1 right over top of 2.6.1 without unstalling 2.6.1. I'm using XP, 1.5Gb 512Ram 40M hd cable modem. Now I have uninstalled 3.1, thinking that might cure the problem.

Got any ideas? I will admit I did not give it 13 minutes to work, but I guess I could launch it and then go buy some dog food for my Great Dane. Help!

[hayc59]

{QUOTE-> Ow I thought I would add .. I have emailed most tech shows to spread the word not to promote this program..
Crap programers should be in jail .. anyone who makes a program and doesnt back it up .. something is wrong <-QUOTE}I can guarantee that no one will listen to you with that attitude!!

:-X ;D

[MikeBCda]

{QUOTE-> I can guarantee that no one will listen to you with that attitude!!
<-QUOTE}

You know, we could be in trouble -- does Jerry Springer count as a "tech show"? ;D ;D

[firehawk]

Doesn't work. That's what I just said...those files pointed to by that thread are corrupt, compressed, or just flat wrong.

The sizes are wrong, they're binary crap (as opposed to text) when looking at them, and it doesn't matter whether one right-clicks and saves or just clicks on the links and saves from there.

They don't work.

Care to zip up the real files and put a few links on the actual javacool page?

Mike

{QUOTE-> Manual updates coming right up, ;)

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=12266


snowbound <-QUOTE}

[kb-matrix]

I too am having difficulty with version 3.1 taking forever to load and determine the protection status. I have read in earlier threads that the size of the registry.dat file may be the culprit. My work computer has a file size of 67,572,310 which for earlier threads qualifies as abnormally large. I have not seen any direction as what the solution is to this problem. Can I simply delete the registry.dat file? I am using Netscape 7.1 which references Mozilla/5.0. Any help would be most appreciated.

[MCT]

{QUOTE-> I too am having difficulty with version 3.1 taking forever to load and determine the protection status. I have read in earlier threads that the size of the registry.dat file may be the culprit. My work computer has a file size of 67,572,310 which for earlier threads qualifies as abnormally large. I have not seen any direction as what the solution is to this problem. Can I simply delete the registry.dat file? I am using Netscape 7.1 which references Mozilla/5.0. Any help would be most appreciated. <-QUOTE}

i think the problem is netscape, try uninstall it maybe?

this has been discussed in previous threads

good luck :D

[javacool]

{QUOTE-> I too am having difficulty with version 3.1 taking forever to load and determine the protection status. I have read in earlier threads that the size of the registry.dat file may be the culprit. My work computer has a file size of 67,572,310 which for earlier threads qualifies as abnormally large. I have not seen any direction as what the solution is to this problem. Can I simply delete the registry.dat file? I am using Netscape 7.1 which references Mozilla/5.0. Any help would be most appreciated. <-QUOTE}

Deleting that registry.dat file will indeed fix the issue - you may, however, lose your custom profile settings (if you've made any) in Netscape.

Best regards,

-Javacool

[Allen Williams]

Hi Folks,
I have done it all, everything I have read on these posts about installing Spyblaster. First I was hit by the SASSER and finally got that thing cleaned up. At the Same time I was hit by about:Blank and the Famous Cool Web Search. I have finally got them under control. I have Ad a Ware, Spybot Search and Destroy, Spyguard, But for the life of me I cannot get the Spyblaster to run. I get the same error "That Spyblaster is Damaged and my hard drive is damaged, bad sector or I have a virus Please reinstall it. Nothing shows up. I have run Nortons 2003 with Live Updates, McCaffees Stinger, Every worm tool out there (almost) and CW Shredder. I have Hijack this, and nothing is showing up there. I also have not been able to download the Sasser fix from Microsoft on their critical update. I just don't know what else to do. As I have said, I have tried everything on this post to get it to work. I have XP Professional Home, IE 6.0. I have all the latest Windows updates (except one). Can anyone tell me what to do or what to check now? There is nothing left. That I can see. Has Spyguard fixed the missing files that I was told in another post that they were having troubles with, when people are downloading it? I have tried every site that offers Spyguard with the same results as above. I have removed it, dozens of times already. PLEASE HELP, OR I GUESS I WILL JUST HAVE TO BLOW IT OFF.
THANK YOU...TO WHOMEVER HELPS ME.
Sincerely, Allen Williams

[LowWaterMark]

Unfortunately, some people who have had certain infections are experiencing this same exact problem. This thread probably describes it best:

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=15913

[TangleWeb]

Hi group,

Have any of you had experience installing SpywareBlaster on a Windows 2000 server running Terminal Services? I performed a small test on an app server running Windows 2000 that has 5 Windows 98 clients that connect using remote desktop & it seemed to install ok. I'm wondering if the parts of the registry it protects are HKLM AND HKCU? I wouldn't think that it would have to be installed by each user to gain full protection would it?

Are there any concerns on a server?

We have a server farm with users connecting from thin clients using Citrix. We have had a few brushes with Internet parasites, Browser Hijackers, etc & would like to protect against them.

~Dave

[lrenfrew]

A little help would be much appreciated. I installed AdAware 6.0, updated it, and it worked well. I installed SpyBot Search & Destroy, updated it, and it worked well. I installed SpyWare guard v 2.2.0. It works well but I can never get the definitions updated. The SG LiveUpdate eventually fails (appears to timeout) with no error message or code returned. Also, I downloaded SpyWare Blaster 3.1 and installed it. A very odd error occures when I try to run it. I get this error message "This program has been damaged, possibly by a bad sector of the hard drive ...." I have downloaded it a couple different times from both JavaCool and other mirrors. The file name is "spywareblastersetup31.exe", file properties indicate version 3.1.0., size is 2215 KB. I have Symantec AntiVirus Enterprise running as a virus detector with up to date definitions and a scan shows no virus infections. (sorry to be long winded).

1) Can anyone figure out why I cant update the SpyWare Guard definitions.

2) Any idea why SpyWare Blaster fails to start?

Thanks in advance.. Lance

[snowbound]

Hi lrenfrew :)

Welcome to Wilders.

Sorry i don't have an answer for your first question but as for your second one there is an extensive thread here,

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=26534&page=1&pp=25

on that topic.

Hope this helps.


snowbound

[UFO-Psycho2]

{QUOTE-> I too am having difficulty with version 3.1 taking forever to load and determine the protection status. I have read in earlier threads that the size of the registry.dat file may be the culprit. My work computer has a file size of 67,572,310 which for earlier threads qualifies as abnormally large. I have not seen any direction as what the solution is to this problem. Can I simply delete the registry.dat file? I am using Netscape 7.1 which references Mozilla/5.0. Any help would be most appreciated. <-QUOTE}

hello everyone, i am new to this forum, i was curious as to what speed is your computer and how much ram do you have, i have spywareblaster 3.1 installed on all three of my networked pc`s, and i can see a big difference in the speed of loading spywareblaster on all three machines, my newer computer which is a 2.0ghz, 512 ddr ram, winXP home it loads very fast, now my 500 mhz, 384 ram, winXP home and my 566 mhz, 384 ram, winXP home loads this program alot slower. just thought i would throw out my experience with this program, btw this program works great, just wanted to say thank you. I did have one question though, is it possible to run both spywareblaster AND spywareguard at the same time, or is it even needed? i currently only use spywareblaster 3.1

[snowbound]

Hi UFO-Psycho2 :)

Welcome to Wilders.

As to your question, yes they get along very well together, this thread should help explain,

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=18132



snowbound

[UFO-Psycho2]

thank you snowbound, i just installed SG and its enabled now. thanks :)

[snowbound]

{QUOTE-> thank you snowbound, i just installed SG and its enabled now. thanks :) <-QUOTE}

Anytime, enjoy. :)


snowbound

[lrenfrew]

Thanks Snowbound. I made a new post with my HiJackThis log in it. I am making progress and enjoying learning about these kinds of problems and how to fix them. Soon I will have cleaned all the crud from my system. .. Lance

[war59312]

Hey,

Just wondering. How about auto update for life price? Say like $30?

Thanks,
Will

[LisaM]

I installed SpywareBlaster 3.1 today after running Spybot and making sure that my computer was clean. Tonight, I was invaded by Blazefind.Bridge and n-Case. I have just run Spybot and cleared them out again. Why didn't SpywareBlaster 3.1 catch them and prevent them from installing on my computer?

[chaos945]

{QUOTE-> Just wondering. How about auto update for life price? <-QUOTE}
I'd be up for that too.

[NoL]

I get the "Unexpected Error" while running 3.1 on WinMe

Is there a fix?

TIA

NoL

[bobcats]

I have installed spyware blaster 3.1 twice now - first time when I went to use it the message I got stated "" cannot find import: DLL may be missing, corrupt or wrong version... file MSVBVM60.DLL,error 1157''' I sure hope my second download works ::)

[snowbound]

{QUOTE-> I have installed spyware blaster 3.1 twice now - first time when I went to use it the message I got stated "" cannot find import: DLL may be missing, corrupt or wrong version... file MSVBVM60.DLL,error 1157''' I sure hope my second download works ::) <-QUOTE}

Hi bobcats :)

Welcome to Wilders.

If the same problem occurs again, go here,

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=12266


snowbound

[goldwing388]

{QUOTE-> JavaCool, smooth as butter!!
thanks for your hard arse work on such
a needed item in this tough oh so tough life
of scum ware!! I/We owe you a debt of gratitude
thank you very mucho!! <-QUOTE}
Hi, I went to the link in your post, and I am speechless. The reminder, of just how personal it was for so many people that day. People who now have no comfort other than knowing that many strangers have chosen to honor their fallen loved ones with a heavy heart.

[war59312]

Still wondering. ;)

[Ghostman1953]

This is where I was told to post this I think so here it is. ;)

Hello John,
Monday, April 26, 2004, 3:22:15 PM CET +2:00, you wrote:

For starters this has to be one one the best little programs I`ve come across yet. :}
The question is, I gave a $20.00 donation now I know I didn`t apply for the auto updates but I was wondring if I can still get them now? No problem if I can`t it`s just easier the auto way.Thanks and thanks for making a great program. :)
This is the general board software email addres; support in regard to
Javacool softwares is only provided on the dedicated Javacool support
forums. Please register as a member and post your question on the relevant Javacool software support forum.


So javacool what about it? ???
I can give you all the info you need such as addy (real) address all ya need.

PM me or mail me at ghostman1953(AT)canada.com


edited email addy to avoid harvesting - Detox

[snowbound]

Hi Ghostman1953,

U should not post your email address. It could be picked up by Harvesters and or Spambots. :o

It would be best to edit it out.


snowbound

[drupert]

>:( I can not download this version. It sends me to an error page. Can someone tell me why? When I go up to download from other sites the same thing happens. This is driving me crazy. Is there someting blocking from these sites to download spyblaster on my computer or I'm just crazy and this not really happening ? lol

[frank from holland]

Is it possible to use spywareblaster and spywaregeuard on the same time on the computer.

thanks for any respons.

frankw

[claire]

Yes,

No problems at all :)

[LowWaterMark]

{QUOTE-> Is it possible to use spywareblaster and spywaregeuard on the same time on the computer. <-QUOTE}
Yes, absolutely. The author meant for them to complement each other, and since they provide different protections in different ways, they are indeed "additive".

[Dazed_and_Confused]

{QUOTE-> Is it possible to use spywareblaster and spywaregeuard on the same time on the computer. <-QUOTE}
I use both, and they do work fine!;D

[mike_the_new_guy]

What is the windows process/service associated with SpywareBlaster3.1? The only exectuable I could find is the spywareblaster.exe process. However, when I close out of the program the process terminates. I would like to confirm that after I "enable all protection" and close out that the program is still actually protecting my box.

Does anyone know the specific process that does this please? THANKS!

Mike

[dog]

{QUOTE-> What is the windows process/service associated with SpywareBlaster3.1? The only exectuable I could find is the spywareblaster.exe process. However, when I close out of the program the process terminates. I would like to confirm that after I "enable all protection" and close out that the program is still actually protecting my box.

Does anyone know the specific process that does this please? THANKS!

Mike <-QUOTE}

Hi Mike, ;)

SpywareBlaster works by placing Kill bits in your registry ...

ie. HKEY_CURRENT_USER\software\microsoft\windows\currentversion\internet settings\zonemap\domains\searchsquire.com

Value is 4

which blocks the domain/software ... so SB 3.1 only needs to run to add these registry keys ... the keys inturn protect you.

Sorry, I couldn't word it better ... I hope this makes sense. :)

HTH

dog - *puppy*

[mike_the_new_guy]

Dog...
thanks for the reply..

I verified that I do have that key with a value of 4. However, I guess my questions now would be... if all the program does when it runs (or when the spywareblaster.exe process is active) is create this key with a value of 4, my next questions would be...

1) why don't I just create this manually and not install the program (hypothetically would this protect my pc?)

2) I am confused as to how the database works into this..Each time a user runs an update there has to be a list of possible threats that is updated. Don't you need a process to read this list and enforce the prevention of creating new (malicious) registry keys?

Mike

[dog]

Hi Mike, ;)

Yes, you could insert your own kill bits ... theorethically, but how would you go about doing all the research, SB database is extensive and a culmination of a lot of work and expertise/experience. It's all provided in a very nice package ... free of charge thanks to Javacool - minus donations ... as serves space comes at a price and Javacool's deserves a donation to help with his costs and any excess for his efforts. This statement is only my opinion, donations are NOT required, but appreciated.

As to updates ... new items added to the database, are separated by SB when downloaded and it adds the new reg. keys as required. It's not designed to protect your registry per say ... only to prevent the addition of known malware reg. keys., Active X etc.

To protect your registry in general you can use Spybot 1.3 ... which employs it's teatimer.exe to monitor registry changes, or DiamondCS regprot, which does the same, I use both. I'll post the links below.

Hope that helps. ;)

dog - *puppy*

*edit* I re-read your post ... the example key I posted was just one of 2942 in the database ... there isn't a single fix all entry so to speak ... there are many ... and the database is regularly added to. Sorry if I misunderstood what you wrote and I hope this helps.

[dog]

Hi Mike, ;)

Here's the Links.

Spybot 1.3 (http://spybot.eon.net.au/index.php?page=download)

DiamondCS (http://www.diamondcs.com.au/index.php?page=products) Freeware located on the second half of the page ... lots of useful tools ... RegistryProt is what I mentioned above.

dog - *puppy*

edit - Here are some other info SB 3.1 (http://www.net-integration.net/tools/spywareblaster.html) and Here (http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster.html)

addition Spybot info although off topic in this thread Here (http://www.net-integration.net/tools/spybotsd.html)

[mike_the_new_guy]

Dog... THANKS a lot for the info and informative links! They were very helpful.. I agree about the donations too. I just want to better understand first and feel confident that any freeware is even doing anything for me before I donate.

Unfortunately, I am still somewhat confused as to how a "kill bit" actually works within the registry. If anyone is out there who actually works on SpywareBlaster, it would nice to have the option to be prompted when a kill bit action occurs. (Pardon my terminology here.. just not familiar with kill bits) I imagine this may get to be quite anoying though.
This would let users, who want to be alerted of this , know that the program is actually working in the background although there is no active process associated with it. Just a suggestion though.. and hey.. this is "free" so I really don't want to come across the wrong way because I am grateful that there are talented people out there helping end users, myself included, freely use the internet without having to worry; as much.. ;)

In basic terms though...SpywareBlaster 3.1 solely prevents the addition of malicious reg keys, while the other programs Dog mentioned, appear to perform both removal and some prevention of malicious processes, reg entries monitoring (both good and bad... for the Spybot teatimer) ... does this sound right?

Mike

[dog]

Hi Mike, :)

This link will explain KIll Bits better ... Microsoft Knowledge Base (http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q240797&ID=KB;EN-US;Q240797)

Another of Javacool's products provides "active" protection = Spyware Guard (http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/sgdownload.html) and works inconjunction with SB 3.1.

The teatimer and regprot ... more than anything notify you of any registry change ... giving you the option to allow or deny it ... again I use both, they're both great proggies.

Spybot immunize feature also works similarly to SB 3.1 in blocking known bad CLSID, works in conjunction with SB (you'll see this if you run immunize in spybot) it also reconizes that SB's database is more extensive ... so in effect Patrick also reconizes and commends Javacools work ... so to speak.

To clean your registry safely ... old/invaild enteries you could use something like regseeker ... available Here (http://www.hoverdesk.net/freeware.htm)

This is the official Javacool Support Forum ... Javacool is always checking in and answers questions ... he will probable respond with an answer ... so check back to see.

dog - *puppy*

*edit* Javacool - Question Starts with Post 154

[mike_the_new_guy]

AWESOME DOG! Great MS kb article find.. exactly what I was looking for .. thank you much for clearing this up! it makes perfect sense now why there is no process.

Do you or does anyone know if the following programs will function properly if installed on the same box?

SPYBOT S&D 1.3 (with Teatimer enabled)
AD-WARE 6.0
SPYWAREBLASTER 3.1
SPYWAREGUARD 2.2
NORTON PERSONAL FIREWALL AND NAV

any installation recomendations? does anyone know of any potential issues?

Mike

[MCT]

{QUOTE-> SPYBOT S&D 1.3 (with Teatimer enabled)
AD-WARE 6.0
SPYWAREBLASTER 3.1
SPYWAREGUARD 2.2 <-QUOTE}
Spyware Guard & TeaTimer do pretty much the same thing, but they are fine toegther if u wanna double access everything :P

i currently run all the programs above no problem (without Spybot's teatimer enabled)

i dont use nav, so i cant say..

hope this helps :D

[dog]

{QUOTE-> AWESOME DOG! Great MS kb article find.. exactly what I was looking for .. thank you much for clearing this up! it makes perfect sense now why there is no process.

Do you or does anyone know if the following programs will function properly if installed on the same box?

SPYBOT S&D 1.3 (with Teatimer enabled)
AD-WARE 6.0
SPYWAREBLASTER 3.1
SPYWAREGUARD 2.2
NORTON PERSONAL FIREWALL AND NAV

any installation recomendations? does anyone know of any potential issues?

Mike <-QUOTE}

Hi Mike, :)

Yes, I have all those proggies installed ... including Norton & teatimer ... No problems at all. Regprot is great too! You'll find lots of useful proggies on this site as well as http://www.wilders.org ... I'd mention more but it would be offtopic in this thread ... if you register as user here (it's free) you can send me a PM (private message) and I could send you some links or start a thread in Software/Services forum and many here will happily reply.

HTH ;)

dog - *puppy*

[anonymous]

I have tip for new record in database

webtoolbars.com

[kozilast]

Hi:

I have tried several times to download SpywareBlaster 3.1 and get the following error when I run the program:

"This program has been damaged, possibly by a bad sector of the hard drive or a virus. Please reinstall it."

I have removed the program (via Add / Remove Programs) and I keep getting the same message. I also have downloaded from several differect sites with no luck. Anu help would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Don

[MCT]

look here

This Program Has Been Damaged... (http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=26534)

regards :D

[snowbound]

Post by kosilast split off as HijackThis log was posted. Can be seen here,

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?p=188314#post188314

Renamed, HijackThis Log.


snowbound

[Lacey]

G'day there!
Hope someone can help me. I just installed and ran SpywareBlaster 3.1. I've been having trouble with spam and hijackers, so in the last two weeks, I've installed AdAware, Spybot S&D, and this one.
(I have to mention I'm a newbie, so please be patient!)
After it finished running I looked in my IE Browser Pages, and I've recognised the addresses of porn sites I have in my restricted sites on my HD!
One was a page I've been having trouble with lately. It's been popping up at any time.
It stated "This item is a Search Assistant related item for the Local Machine Search Assistant."
This address appears 4 times!
Another one looks like a variant of that address, it appears twice.
Also there are two files I recognise as another popup porn site.
It states: "This item is the Local Machine's Default_Page_URL", and "This item is the Local Machine's homepage, or start page."
I did have trouble with them until I added them in my restricted sites a while ago. I scanned for them and they were gone. Now they're back again? I don't understand how that could be. I couldn't find where to delete them...can anyone enlighten a computer illiterate idjit please?
Thanks in advance,
Lacey ;)

[dog]

Hi Lacey, :)

Welcome to Wilders' ;)

Follow this post by LWM Here (http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=15913) and post your log ( start a new thread - new thread button is located in the upper left corner ) in this Forum (http://www.wilderssecurity.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)

Remember do not fix anything with Hijack This ... Post a log and an expert will provide instruction ... be patient as many of the experts live in different time zones, but you will receive assistance shortly. :)

HTH

dog - *puppy*

[Lacey]

Thanks Dog! Sorry 'bout that. Guess I'm still treading water here! ::)
Lacey

[dog]

Hi Lacey, :)

No apology needed ... you haven't done anything wrong :) ... I'm just directing you to the appropriate forum, so you'll receive the help you require ... ;) Sorry, if you interpreted what I posted differently, it wasn't my intent. ;)

We're Glad your Here. :) Enjoy your stay ... It's a great Community! :)

dog - *puppy*

[Winkers]

You said to post if you have any problems. I do! ???

I downloaded 3.1 without a problem. However, when I attempted to install, I get the message as follows:

"C:\WINNT\system32\MSINET.OCX
An error occurred when trying to replace the existing file:
DeleteFile Failed: code 32
The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process. Abort Retry Cancel."

I've tried several times with nothing but Win2K running, and can't get past this. Do I have to be logged on with Admin authority to accomplish this? What is the MSINET.OCX anyway? Why are you deleting it?

[snowbound]

Hi Winkers. :)

Welcome to Wilders.

Take a look at this link,

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=5169

Post back and let u s know if it solved your problem.


snowbound

[wender]

I too saw something strange: the last update is from '04-05-18 and updating dat files from my 3.1-version seems to have a fake-connect without visibility.
Because i did not trust the update function, i did not reload the 3.1 version.
I have not seen a 3.0 vs after i have installed 3.1 without problems.
But if something like CWShredder is not updated enough (against 'coolweb' stuff) maybe it cleans something to get your SWB updated?

grtz

[DoubleVision19]

Alohas from Hawaii...I've searched all over the forum, but I can't find anyone with a similar problem that I've had when I installed Spywareblaster & SpywareGuard. This is what I'm running on my PC:

XP Pro with Logitech diNovo Bluetooth Keyboard, Media Pad & Mouse and Spysweeper along with Norton Anti-Virus and Norton System Utilities...

When I installed Spywareblaster & SpywareGuard, it installed without any problems, but when I rebooted my PC, it hangs up for a bit and then it doesn't load up some of my startup programs like "BTT Tray" Used for my bluetooth devices, Norton System Utilities, and Spysweeper. I ran Norton System Utilities to see if it could have fixed the problem, but no luck. I get the same problem with I restart my PC. Had no choice, but to do a System Restore. I've got it to work with my PC at the office, but my home PC didn't like it. Can anyone help me find a solution? Mahalos in advance.

DoubleVision19 @ 16:36 Hawaiian time

[Me, Myself and IT]

Will there ever be a coporate version of Spyware Blaster and Spyware Guard. I want to push the out to my company, but since there is no central installation point other than the automatic update feature it does nto quite help me. Are they any possibilities of it going in that direction

[MCT]

as javacool has stated in many threads, their is a network version that will work with multiple pcs

{QUOTE->
That said, there is a Network Version of SpywareBlaster that is being developed that will allow easy updating and protection for multi-computer setups. No ETA yet, but it is actively being worked on. <-QUOTE}

that was a quote from another thread he replied too, do a search for "network version" in the spyware blaster forum

good luck :D

[frankws]

why are there so less updates for spywareguard en when can we expect a new release.

frank

[FanJ]

Hi Javacool,

I only now tried to install 3.1
Sorry, I know how hard you work on your programs (and it is very much appreciated!!!), but I've got the same error message as some others.
Windows 98 SE Dutch, IE 5.5 SP2, P3 600, 512 MB RAM.
I had 2.6.1 installed.
Maybe I did something wrong....
Disconnected from the net, disabled AV, rebooted, closed all apps near the clock and in Contrl-Alt-Del except Explorer and Systray, deleted applog, run WindowWasher and MRUBlaster, did a quick scandisk, uninstalled version 2.6.1, deleted existing SpywareBlaster dir, installed 3.1, rebooted, started 3.1 and the error-message came-up.

MD5 checksum of the installation file:
The file <D:\SpywareBlaster\Version 3_1\spywareblastersetup31.exe> has the following Checksum(s)
MD5 - BFC312A531FCFCA5205FE385177CC5EA

As far as I know I don't have Viruses, Trojans, spyware on my system.

I will later run NISFileCheck and ADinf32 Pro to see what has been changed.

Thanks, keep up the good work !!!
Cheers, Jan

[javacool]

{QUOTE-> Hi Javacool,

I only now tried to install 3.1
Sorry, I know how hard you work on your programs (and it is very much appreciated!!!), but I've got the same error message as some others.
<-QUOTE}

Hi,

I believe I've fixed this one for the next version, 3.2. :)

So no worries! (But your report is appreciated.)

Best regards,

-Javacool

[FanJ]

Hi JC :D

Thanks ;) .

OK, I did run NISFileCheck, checking for exe, dll, com, ocx, vxd, sys, bat files, and lots of individual files.
Nothing unusual it seems to me ;)

Application: c:\program files\spywareblaster\updatersup.exe
Status: Changed: (Deleted, File not found error)
Version old: 1.01.0001
Size old: 24576
Date old: 2003-06-26 17:59:18
RMD160 Hash old: D516D4DB03DC87C592F0AB852AFD1FFAEED552AB

Application: c:\program files\spywareblaster\spywareblaster.exe
Status: Changed
Version old: 2.06.0001
Version new: 3.01
Size old: 1257472
Size new: 843776
Date old: 2003-09-08 23:09:18
Date new: 2004-04-07 19:47:08
RMD160 Hash old: 0CA17C07A7D41575F7E056C622AFFBCE7B7E279D
RMD160 Hash new: B9559D314F8DDF97612DB24DB872D5147E2E673D

Application: c:\program files\spywareblaster\unins000.exe
Status: Changed
Version old: 51.5.0.0
Version new: 51.13.0.0
Size old: 72748
Size new: 76233
Date old: 2003-01-28 13:07:14
Date new: 2004-06-08 14:29:54
RMD160 Hash old: 1ECAEABDA46090980B6F8DD68D0010CD0653F2B8
RMD160 Hash new: AE788DF394BDA4F89E62A1C6B4EA73CAB8549A21


Application: c:\program files\spywareblaster\sbautoupdate.exe
Status: New added
Version old: 3.01
Size old: 835584
Date old: 2004-04-07 17:25:26
RMD160 Hash old: E603A99E3BE0E07AB02E651AF0ADE299EA3CD434

[FanJ]

Here is the info (using Karen's Directory Printer) about all the files now existing in my SpywareBlaster dir, with their MD5 checksums:

c:\Program Files\SpywareBlaster\ckdatabase.dtb
955982C7C2936EFBEE7F8EC35CFA09F3
c:\Program Files\SpywareBlaster\license.txt
811FA707BA49034A7349E14CF47535F8
c:\Program Files\SpywareBlaster\readme.txt
02334553CB0B3FF8363A79CA6CFD702B
c:\Program Files\SpywareBlaster\rsdatabase.dtb
FC87D8911C4E28D476AC3194EE858E25
c:\Program Files\SpywareBlaster\sbauhelp.chm
839CCEC5719E3913E0F28EDB5AF0007E
c:\Program Files\SpywareBlaster\sbautoupdate.exe
9A3452567C8ED145433CC288F1B38D30
c:\Program Files\SpywareBlaster\sbdatabase.dtb
A6CB3FE07C85EA20CA34AB8CFC7569DD
c:\Program Files\SpywareBlaster\sbdatabase2.dtb
A257F0C0558621EB24E54E5678678DCC
c:\Program Files\SpywareBlaster\sbhelp.chm
8E47B7F50EF2C0854FDF68F1340B7BD8
c:\Program Files\SpywareBlaster\sbinfo.dtb
A03DE2A2537FA33F9A0351DC5EAD1841
c:\Program Files\SpywareBlaster\spywareblaster.exe
80969EB67B90EC5F0D7B0D3FD7F3B43F
c:\Program Files\SpywareBlaster\unins000.dat
2C196B7AD57E1174E4AB832A674AD5CC
c:\Program Files\SpywareBlaster\unins000.exe
4C34DF91D98590343A0CF68C0EC913C2

[FanJ]

Hi JC,

I opened my jv16 Power Tools (1.3) and looked for Registered File Types.
I didn't see .dtb mentioned in it.
I'm not sure here but shouldn't it be listed there...

[lye]

You know i installed ur spyware blaster 3 weeks ago and together with hijackthis tool . My computer is completely adware and spyware FREE for three weeks and counting!! THANKS! :o)

[TomP]

{QUOTE->
I believe I've fixed this one for the next version, 3.2. :)
<-QUOTE}

I have the same problem. Unfortunately I am infected with some spyware and so far have not found any way to disinfect.

How soon do you plan to release 3.2?

Thanks and keep up the fight for all of us. ;)

Cheers,
Tom

[ignat]

I have an error message: "This program has been damaged, possibly by a bad sector of the hard drive or a virus. Please reinstall it."
I tryed reinstall but got the same message. What should I do ?

[LowWaterMark]

ignat,

That error generally occurs following a particular type of spyware occurrence on a PC. Take a look at this thread, but more importantly within the first response in that thread is a link to a lengthy thread where users have found various solutions to the problem. But, most of those solutions are complex so you may want to wait until Javacool finds an automated fix.

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=32428

[Radimus]

I am looking to do some unattended installs and I see that you are using Inno Setup. I am using "/silent /nocancel" The prog bar entertains the user and usually prevents them from restarting the PC.

What switches will enable protection or prevent the gui from loading.

Thanks, this thing rocks

[Radimus]

I suppose I can use Kill to kill the process and reg import the settings.... or repackage it using winInstall... but I'd prefer to use the original package.

[krachen]

I have your new 3.1 installed on my three machines at home. I use two of them for my Greyhound rescue (non-profit). I just want to thank you'all for putting this out for people like me to use. It has saved me hours of maintenance on my machines. My computer budget is minimal (a 500mhz and a 1ghz both running ME). This helps me and what I do for our rescue allot. Thanks..........

[Av8r]

I am unable to insall 3.1. I have Spyware Guard running and had SpywareBlaster operating at one time but then it wouldn't work so I uninstalled it and reinstalled and now I get this message after installing it:

"This program has been damaged, possibly by a bad sector of the hard drive or a virus. Please reinstall it."

I have run Spybot, McAfee, and Pestpatrol and found and deleted several trojans and hijackers. I'm guessing there's still something on my computer preventing me from installing Blaster.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Dc

[snowbound]

Hi Av8r :)

Welcome to Wilders.

There's quite an extensive thread on just this problem here,

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=26534

It seems to be caused by a CWS infection.

Hope this helps.


snowbound

[sgasgsdfgasfgsdgf]

protection for firefox .9 is not loading... it says that its not installed on the main splash page... please investigate@@!!!

[LowWaterMark]

{QUOTE-> protection for firefox .9 is not loading... it says that its not installed on the main splash page... please investigate@@!!! <-QUOTE}
There are a couple threads on that already. Since it is a new version, and changed some properties, it is not yet support by SpywareBlaster:

New Firefox 0.9 (http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=36815)

[boomerang]

Why does 3.1 not detect the Firefox browser. I just started using v0.9 and the "Protection: --> Firefox" button doesn't see that I have firefox installed.

I couldn't even connect to this forum using Firefox.

How or what can I do to tell spyblaster that I DO have Firefox installed.

Windows 2000 Pro, service pack 4

Thanks,

Andy

Just saw the answer in post #194.

P.S. What a lousy first post, huh?!!! --Andy

[khmelnitsky]

Yes I would like to see changes for FF 0.9 protection please?
thanks

[Ruud ter Laare]

Strange, Spywareblaster 3.1 had no problems finding Mozilla Firefox 0.8. After upgrading to Mozilla Firefox 0.9, Spywareblaster tells me there's no Mozilla/Firefox installed.

[javacool]

{QUOTE-> Strange, Spywareblaster 3.1 had no problems finding Mozilla Firefox 0.8. After upgrading to Mozilla Firefox 0.9, Spywareblaster tells me there's no Mozilla/Firefox installed. <-QUOTE}

The Mozilla/Firefox crew changed a few things in their latest Firefox version (0.9), including the default profile directory.

SpywareBlaster 3.2, which I'm working on finishing right now, will add support for Firefox 0.9. :) (I can't estimate when it will be publically available, as it still will have to go through some testing, but I hope to have it out soon.)

Best regards,

-Javacool

[aint got one]

Um when I try to run this program a error message pops up saying
"This program has been damaged possibly a bad sector of the hard drive or a virus please reinstall it UMMMM ????? what

[LowWaterMark]

{QUOTE-> Um when I try to run this program a error message pops up saying
"This program has been damaged possibly a bad sector of the hard drive or a virus please reinstall it UMMMM ????? what <-QUOTE}
There are lots of threads on this very topic in this forum. This is the most detailed one:

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=26534

[ebowankenobi]

Dear Friends,
I got problems to run the Spywareblaster application, it was running before but now it always appear the message :

This program has been damaged, possibly by a bad sector of the hard drive or a virus. Please reinstall it.

I already delete/uninstall the program several times, and I reinstall the application again, but always this message, please help and advise I should do.

Thank you very much for your support

best regards

Ebowan

[LowWaterMark]

{QUOTE-> This program has been damaged, possibly by a bad sector of the hard drive or a virus. Please reinstall it. <-QUOTE}
That error is usually a sign of a prior spyware infection that still needs to be cleaned off a system. It is explained more in this three-page thread:

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=26534

Within that thread are many user supplied fixes and work-arounds for this problem. And on the third page is a link to a German site that offers a file download that may automatically fix the problem. (It's near a 100% solution if you first download, install and update Ad-aware to latest levels, run a full Ad-aware scan first then immediately run the download fix file from that site.) So it may take a little research and work to resolve this yourself. Also, Javacool has said is trying to code something into SpywareBlaster so that it can compensate for this type of condition (infection, or whatever it is) automatically. But we'll have to wait for the next version to see what he can do to address this.

[Steve07]

Hi, I just dl spywareblaster 3.1 and I also dl firefox browser. My problem is that when I open my spywarebalster program it says that firefox is not installed and it does not detect it. Can anyone help with this it would be much appreciated thx in advance.

[LowWaterMark]

{QUOTE-> Hi, I just dl spywareblaster 3.1 and I also dl firefox browser. My problem is that when I open my spywarebalster program it says that firefox is not installed and it does not detect it. Can anyone help with this it would be much appreciated thx in advance. <-QUOTE}
There are actually a lot of threads on this. ;)

Here's one:

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=38597

[Hawk30673]

{QUOTE-> SpywareBlaster 3.1 has been released!

New in this version:
-Restricted Sites Protection
-Mozilla/Firefox Protection
-A brand-new interface
-And many, many other new features and changes!

This 3.1 release provides bug fixes and enhanced performance.
The Mozilla/Firefox protection should now correctly detect profiles for Mozilla 1.7 & Firefox 0.8 and up.

NEW UPDATING OPTIONS IN SPYWAREBLASTER 3.1
SpywareBlaster still offers the built-in Check for Updates feature. This feature is completely free and allows you to keep up-to-date by clicking on a button in the SpywareBlaster interface.

SpywareBlaster 3.1 now offers SpywareBlaster AutoUpdate - a brand-new updating solution. Just set it up, and AutoUpdate will check at every system boot for the latest updates and enable the newest protection (other options are available).

As much as we would like to provide auto-updating functionality for free, bandwidth costs are simply too great to make it feasible. AutoUpdate functionality is $9.95 (US) per year, which helps to cover the bandwidth costs. The Check for Updates function remains completely free, as does SpywareBlaster. You only need to pay if you wish to have the extra convenience of AutoUpdate.

Download the latest version here: http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster.html

Enjoy! ;D

Best regards,

-Javacool

P.S. If you have any problems please don't hesitate to post. <-QUOTE}

Can you please tell me if the Spywarebuster runs as soon as I turn on the computer or do I have to start it each time after log on?

Thanks!

[Steve07]

Thx for the link :)

[dog]

{QUOTE-> Can you please tell me if the Spywarebuster runs as soon as I turn on the computer or do I have to start it each time after log on?

Thanks! <-QUOTE}

Hi Hawk, ;)

No, Spyware Blaster isn't a running process ... once you enable protection, it adds Kill Bits to your registry to Block "Bad" Active X controls, it also prevents Spyware Tracking cookies in IE, Mozilla, and Firefox (currently doesn't work with FireFox 0.9 - because they changed the default directory for it)

All you have to do to is .... check for updates weekly ... when there is a new update, select enable all protection ... that's it, it's that simple ... It's an outstanding little program ...

{QUOTE->
Spyware, adware, browser hijackers, and dialers are some of the fastest-growing threats on the Internet today. By simply browsing to a web page, you could find your computer to be the brand-new host of one of these unwanted fiends!

The most important step you can take is to secure your system. And SpywareBlaster is the most powerful protection program available.

Prevent the installation of ActiveX-based spyware, adware, browser hijackers, dialers, and other potentially unwanted pests.

Block spyware/tracking cookies in Internet Explorer and Mozilla/Firefox. Restrict the actions of potentially dangerous sites in Internet Explorer. SpywareBlaster can help keep your system spyware-free and secure, without interfering with the "good side" of the web.

And unlike other programs, SpywareBlaster does not have to remain running in the background. <-QUOTE}

Javacool has another program ... Spyware Guard 2.2 ... that offers active protection and works hand in hand with Spyware Blaster ... you can find out more about it HERE (http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareguard.html)

Javacool has many other great programs available here's a link to the Products Page (http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/products.html)

dog - *puppy*

[Steve07]

quick question. I am have firfox and I made it the default browser and from time to time a popup add comes up on my screen and it is with the IE browser but I don't even have it as the default can someone help plz thx if there is a thread on this srry.

[Justin126]

Is there any chance of a patch that will work with Firefox version .9 because I think alot of people would like that...or is it just me ???

[borehole]

{QUOTE-> What versions of Mozilla or Firefox are you using?

3.1 only supports Mozilla 1.7 and up, and Firefox 0.8 and up.

Best regards,

-Javacool <-QUOTE}

=============
I have just downloaded the latest versions of firefox and SpywareBlaster into two computers with windows XP. In one it is working, in the other it does not recognize my firefox. The only difference is that the default location was changed in the instalation that does not recognize firefox... any advise?

Borehole

[MtnMoose]

I installed this yesterday and it appeared to work fine. When I booted up today it wasn't running. Does it have to go into startup to configure automatically?

Yesterday when I closed the program it indicated it was working and appeared on the toolbar/status bar. Today when I close it....nothing.

Recommendations?

Also, can this work with my Netscape browser as I don't use the I.E. Thank you
MJ

[Azn_Tweaker]

MtnMoose u dont have to start it up. its just there. it dosent use reasources.

[Justin126]

I was also wondering if SpywareBlaster would be affected by SpyBot Search & Destroy which is another helpful program I use? And if so, how? ???

[BlackSwan]

No, SpywareBlaster works very well with Spybot Search & Destroy. In fact they complement each other for maximum protection.

BS 8)

[lazenca]

Hi all.... I just encountered a problem with my computer... It seems that after I got this spyware problem, I was going to use spyware blaster to deal with it...But who knows when i wanted to open the Spyware Blaster program, it says that the file is damaged by a certain virus or whatever... So I decided to dowload this program again and reinstall it... But it seems that the same problem still occured... From my opinion I actually thought that the spyware must have done something to this program causing it not to function... So can anyone help me here? Thanks

[snowbound]

Hi lazenca :)

Welcome to Wilders.

U are right, it is indeed the cause of a CWS infection.

There is a very long thread on this subject here,

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=26534

there is a fix that has been working for some people on page #3, posted by JackAttack.

Hope this helps.


snowbound

[jcarole]

Just installed Mozilla Firefox 0.9.1. SpywareBlaster 3.1 didn't recognize it. Uninstalled/reinstalled SpywareBlaster 3.1; same result. Running Windows XP Home with IE uninstalled. Thanks in advance for suggestions.

[dog]

Hi jcarole, ;)

Welcome to Wilders' ;)

This is a known issue ... they changed the default directory in the 0.9 + versions so SB 3.1 doesn't detect it ... SB 3.2 will correct this issue, Javacool has mention it will be release shortly.

dog - *puppy*

[jcarole]

Thanks for the quick reply dog. Great cat pics--my favoriteis is contentment.

[dog]

{QUOTE-> Thanks for the quick reply dog. Great cat pics--my favoriteis is contentment. <-QUOTE}

My Pleasure & Thanks ;)

Steve - *puppy*

[crzycrkr]

Downloaded and when i installed i was getting messages about a bad hard drive sector or some nonsense. Wont run, any suggestions?

[LowWaterMark]

{QUOTE-> Downloaded and when i installed i was getting messages about a bad hard drive sector or some nonsense. Wont run, any suggestions? <-QUOTE}
Look a few posts up from this one (#216 just above) it explains that problem.

[Simon Coxson]

Hello

We are looking at this great product for our college, because of the amount of spyware that gets installed by users.

We know the product is free for educational use, but we want to enable the auto-update feature per machine in the college. Do we have to buy a key for every machine in the college (which is 700+) or is there a special educational site licence available?

Does anyone know or can help?

Simon Coxson

[firehawk]

The instructions in the thread listed below still don't work correctly. The files come out corrupted or compressed in some way.

Is there a working manual update solution?

Mike


{QUOTE-> Manual updates coming right up, ;)

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=12266


snowbound <-QUOTE}

[dog]

Are you copying, moving or saving those file into your spyware blaster folder? To overwrite the existing ones.

What error exactly are you getting? (regarding coruption)

dog - *puppy*