trjam
May 10th, 2010, 06:01 AM
This isnt about which is better but more about the time has come for vendors to make a fundmental change in their pricing structure. Prices of computers continue to drop. But yet everything evolves around a magical numerical limit, on what a product will protect and cost.
I have always wondered how the majority of them came up with 1 and 3 as the two most used combinations for licensing software. That doesnt cur it anymore. The price is getting way to high, products that are free have vastly improved and the vendors who charge, best look for a more creative pricing structure.
This isnt me, I have plenty of friends who talk specifically about this issue. I dont know what the answer is, a family license?. To me, there shouldnt be any increase for the number of users in a specific location. I do realize the limitation on that with things getting out of hand.
I guess maybe more along the lines of, you buy a product, can install it on up to 10 computers but only 5 may be online at anytime.;)
I have always wondered how the majority of them came up with 1 and 3 as the two most used combinations for licensing software. That doesnt cur it anymore. The price is getting way to high, products that are free have vastly improved and the vendors who charge, best look for a more creative pricing structure.
This isnt me, I have plenty of friends who talk specifically about this issue. I dont know what the answer is, a family license?. To me, there shouldnt be any increase for the number of users in a specific location. I do realize the limitation on that with things getting out of hand.
I guess maybe more along the lines of, you buy a product, can install it on up to 10 computers but only 5 may be online at anytime.;)