SpyShelter Tested (with LeakTest and Commerical Keyloggers)

[maymoons]

i tested spyshelter today with many leaktests and some commerical keyloggers.

ver3.2 has some problem but with ver3.3 it is more powerfull.

they added ZE (Zemana Extreme Leak Test Runner) Protection, Some new clipboard protection methods (Alpin Simulation cant bypass ver 3.3)

i will test it with more commerical keyloggers, soon.

[maymoons]

i sent report to Spyshelter
They controlled and accepted, They said that about ecodsoft clipboard test "we need up to 72 hours to make update but first need to analyze this method"

[jmonge]

this spyshelter looks like it has some feature;)

[Noob]

Yeah, looks kinda strong according to these "tests" ;D

[Franklin]

Very nice testings maymoons and well laid out. :thumb:

[jmonge]

i put SpyShelter with defensewall and just for the heck of tested with the zemana keylogger test and both applications jump when keystroke wants to be log;) very nice too bad they only give 10 days for trial;D that sucks big time:)

[Noob]

-{ Quote: "i put SpyShelter with defensewall and just for the heck of tested with the zemana keylogger test and both applications jump when keystroke wants to be log;) very nice too bad they only give 10 days for trial;D that sucks big time:)" }-
LOL 10 days trial? O_O
Kinda short hahaha

[jmonge]

yes it is very short time indeed man>:(

[jmonge]

i am currently testing with spyware and no pop ups at all all the work it's done by DefenseWall;D man i am getting alot of pop ups from DW cool;D i always see it silent but not today:thumb:

[Thankful]

Designed very similar to Zemana with anti-keylogger and system defense module. It would be interesting to test the system defense module against 0 day malware. This is where the real value lies.

[jmonge]

i am and it doesnt give me any pop ups the malware loads very easilly;D i tested like 20 malware in the wild and to me didnt protect me at all,maybe i am testing this the wrong way;D so if i am so sorry;D

[Saraceno]

-{ Quote: "yes it is very short time indeed man>:(" }-

Considering how fast people test and change programs here, that's a lifetime (licence). ;) :P

[jmonge]

you got me there buddy;D

[bellgamin]

I'll make one short comment & then desist from further participation in this thread.

TO WIT: Lock down outbound connections (via HIPS or Firewall or Network Monitor) & real-time, special-purpose, antikeylog apps are superfluous.

[aigle]

Very nice testing.

I wonder if you could test some more applications for a comparison, like DW, GesWall, CFP, etc.

[stackz]

Test it with an API fuzzer and enjoy some nice BSODs. ::)

[maymoons]

i tested spyshelter v3.3 with 11 commerical keyloggers tonight.
i will test it with more apps
This is test report;

[subset]

@ maymoons

I assume you installed Spyshelter first and then the Keyloggers.
If so, have you tested any the other way round?

Cos many Anti-Keyloggers fail terribly if the Keylogger was installed first, especially against the one with drivers.

Cheers

[maymoons]

-{ Quote: "Cos many Anti-Keyloggers fail terribly if the Keylogger was installed first, especially against the one with drivers." }-
i know so i make test with another way.

1. install spyshelter
2. close spyshelter protection
3. install keylogger
4. run keylogger, activate spying, change settings "run with windows" (and activate stealth mode if it has)
5. restart machine

[subset]

Just did one quick test with your method with Ultimate Keylogger and XP SP3.

SpyShelter failed to block the recording of page visited, so UKL was also able to record search strings.

216661

I have no clue if SpyShelter should protect against this, even there is this AntiNetworkSpy module with its description "It blocks HTTP/HTTPS logging..."

Cheers

[maymoons]

-{ Quote: "I have no clue if SpyShelter should protect against this, even there is this AntiNetworkSpy module with its description "It blocks HTTP/HTTPS logging..." " }-

v3.3 hasnt got this protection. i didnt test http/https logging.

:) you are lucky because when i was sleeping, v3.5 released. i didnt test ver3.5, i tested v3.3

Now, on web site say v3.5 released, they has new module called as internet security;

-{ Quote: "Internet security
SpyShelter AntiNetworkSpy protactive module prevents dangerous trojans from stealing your private information while important SSL internet transactions. It also blocks HTTP/HTTPS trojans on user level as well as POP,SMTP,FTP, loggers." }-


i will test this function
But my previosly test about key/clipboard/screen activites log
İf you test spyshelter with ultimate keylogger, spyshelter can easly block ul. keylogger.

AntiNetworkSpy is a new function, it looks like zemana anti-ssl logger function but more powerfull. it has also anti -http, pop, smtp, ftp logger protection. But i didnt test.

[subset]

-{ Quote: "
you are lucky because when i was sleeping, v3.5 released. i didnt test ver3.5, i tested v3.3" }-
Just downloaded the installer from the website and overlooked the different versions. :P
However, SpyShelter did not even prevent the logging of sites (search strings included) with 3.5.

I have also tried nasty Elite Keylogger from WideStep and this was strange.
Nothing worked as expected till I removed the SpyShelter driver manually.
Don't know if it's a conflict or the AntiKernelModeLogger from SpyShelter, but Elite Keylogger was not even able to save its settings. :doubt:

Cheers

[maymoons]

now, i tested spyshelter with 12 commerical keyloogger.
This is test report;
You can find all keyloggers on softpedia.com, you can test yourself if you want.
new test coming

[ViVek]

really good software:)Got it!

[maymoons]

Now, i finished my test.
i tested SS with about 60 commerical keylogger and 6 popular leak test.
it is good app, easy to use and effective.

You can verify all tests with SS v3.53, you can download all commerical keyloggers from softpedia.

i test this software for myself, I will not test more commercial keyloggers. In ahead i will test it with real malwares which i form with RAT tools.

This is full test report;

[maymoons]

Note: i tested SS with ecodsoft keylogger again,
new version protect against clipboard logger.

[SafetyFirst]

Maymoons, since you proved to be an excellent tester, I wonder if you could find the time to test some other antikeyloggers too?

I am particularly interested to see shoulder to shoulder comparison of Zemana AntiLogger, PrivacyKeyboard and DataGuard Antikeylogger Ultimate.

[ViVek]

nice really nice:)

[lubieplacki]

Good job, thank you maymoons

[maymoons]

-{ Quote: "Good job, thank you maymoons
" }-

-{ Quote: "nice really nice
" }-

you are wellcome

[Rasheed187]

I have checked out SpyShelter in a virtual machine, just to see what all the buzz was about, but the first thing I noticed that this is a popup HIPS (just like Zemana AntiLogger if I´m correct)? If so, this is very disappointing, I mean any classical HIPS can do this. I´m more interested in "no questions asked" antiloggers, like for example KeyScrambler or Prevx SafeOnline (which only protects the browser, I´m not sure if that´s good enough).

[demoneye]

its look same concept as zemana was at its first stage.
this software missing some important things like export/import ability and minimize at software close .

cheers:-\

[Rasheed187]

-{ Quote: "I assume you installed Spyshelter first and then the Keyloggers.
If so, have you tested any the other way round?
Cos many Anti-Keyloggers fail terribly if the Keylogger was installed first, especially against the one with drivers." }-

-{ Quote: "
i know so i make test with another way.

1. install spyshelter
2. close spyshelter protection
3. install keylogger
4. run keylogger, activate spying, change settings "run with windows" (and activate stealth mode if it has)
5. restart machine" }-

@ maymoons

Can you perhaps clarify how you performed these tests? Because like I said before, SpyShelter doesn´t seem to be able to automaticly block key/screenloggers, so did you block all these keyloggers by clicking on the "deny" button, when they are trying to load a hook or driver, for example? :what:

[maymoons]

sure, i click deny button if ss alert me. (after restart-No:5)
it just ask blabla.exe want to record key (like zemana)
ss hasnt got blacklist, it cant block automaticly. But it has whitelist, some apps can "load a hook or driver" without asking (for example; prevx on whitelist)

if you ask me, i tested it like you want
but it is not necessary, i dont recommend to close SS or Zemana or any other security software