ako
November 17th, 2009, 03:51 AM
I read this thread (Given by Triple Helix)
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=251113
MRG seems indeed to be suspect tester, but I think one can still learn from their tests something (if one is careful) as well as I think I can learn eg. from this Symantec sponsored test:
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=256947
My point was mainly to critisize the argument of false testing methology. It was an on-demand test. If Prevx does not shine in such a test, it may indicate that Prevx does not shine in on-demand scanning.
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=251113
MRG seems indeed to be suspect tester, but I think one can still learn from their tests something (if one is careful) as well as I think I can learn eg. from this Symantec sponsored test:
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=256947
My point was mainly to critisize the argument of false testing methology. It was an on-demand test. If Prevx does not shine in such a test, it may indicate that Prevx does not shine in on-demand scanning.