Tested compatibility with DefenseWall for your coming features?

[raven211]

Simply thinking about things like semi-sandboxing, USB-protection, etc. and if you've tested this with the DefenseWall software (and similar for that matter...) to see if any conflicts because of approach appears?

[PrevxHelp]

-{ Quote: "Simply thinking about things like semi-sandboxing, USB-protection, etc. and if you've tested this with the DefenseWall software (and similar for that matter...) to see if any conflicts because of approach appears?" }-

We haven't tested DefenseWall yet but are still engineering everything so that it will be conceptually compatible with other conventional technologies. There is a possibility for some browser-based protection incompatibility but we're working on using a whitelisting approach for those applications (like SafeCentral and Trusteer).

We also have a transparent keyboard scrambling/encryption module for browser data now and are working to ensure we will remain compatible with other scrambling technologies like the aptly named KeyScrambler :)

[jmonge]

-{ Quote: "We haven't tested DefenseWall yet but are still engineering everything so that it will be conceptually compatible with other conventional technologies. There is a possibility for some browser-based protection incompatibility but we're working on using a whitelisting approach for those applications (like SafeCentral and Trusteer).

We also have a transparent keyboard scrambling/encryption module for browser data now and are working to ensure we will remain compatible with other scrambling technologies like the aptly named KeyScrambler :)" }-good to know joe:thumb:cool stuff coming up:thumb: