View Full Version : XP SP3 no AV or windows FW
1nvad3r
July 13th, 2009, 01:01 PM
I'm just curious if a XP SP3 computer with no AV, windows FW turned off, no FW router, and connected to a public internet, not doing anything, would get any malware?
Cudni
July 13th, 2009, 02:15 PM
Eventually yes
Gullible Jones
July 14th, 2009, 02:58 PM
In some cases, within minutes. (http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2004/11/4426.ars)
the Tester
July 14th, 2009, 04:09 PM
Yes. And probably in short order.
Fly
July 16th, 2009, 09:50 AM
Not that long ago, I read on this forum that, at least in theory, you don't need a firewall.
As long as you have no services listening (default?), no firewall for inbound protection would be necessary.
I'm not saying I believe that.
Would anyone care to comment ?
(Btw, I use Windows XP Home Edition service pack 2)
Joeythedude
July 16th, 2009, 10:17 PM
Other thread is here.
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=245354
If its got the default windows services settings then probably yes.
If some of these are turned off then probably not.
There would be 2 risks left I know of
1. a new vulnerability is found in the services you still have running.
2. an application on the PC opens a port.
Its a bit of a grey area to me though. :)
For example I originally thought the idea of port being open was analogous to a door being open.
Now I think it can cover 2 very different senarios
1. opening a door without expecting anyone and then leaving it open to let anyone in.
2. After hearing the knock from outside ,open the door to let someone you expected in.
1 - would be, say a windows service works.
2 - the way a browser works.
Both open a port but the security risks that result are very different.
1nvad3r
July 18th, 2009, 03:18 AM
k i understand, minimum is having a firewall if listening services r left at default.
wat0114
July 18th, 2009, 08:13 AM
-{ Quote: "
If its got the default windows services settings then probably yes.
If some of these are turned off then probably not.
There would be 2 risks left I know of
1. a new vulnerability is found in the services you still have running.
" }-
I tend to agree with this. I have only three processes listening: alg.exe. jqs.exe and DKservice.exe listening when no programs are open. I'm willing to bet I could have this laptop sit on a public network for a very long time before it succumbs to attacks. Of course this is only conjecture on my part, but I feel confident it's not all that vulnerable in its present state. it is running a reduced services profile and problem port 445 is disabled
Mrkvonic
July 18th, 2009, 10:44 AM
If you have no ports open, no.
If you have ports open, maybe, depending on patches and such.
Gullible, your link is from 2004 ... SP2 was only starting to get baked then. The question was about SP3.
Mrk
vBulletin® Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2012, Wilders Security Forums