PDA

View Full Version : Is Smart security realy so bad ?


ttttt1
May 5th, 2009, 10:29 AM
Look on this test http://www.matousec.com/projects/proactive-security-challenge/results.php can i believe it ?

Ade 1
May 5th, 2009, 11:45 AM
If you searched first before posting you'll find there are other threads relating to this test and ESS. I'm sure you'll find all the answers you need there.

ttttt1
May 5th, 2009, 11:57 AM
When you know about it,link me it then.

Najem1992
May 5th, 2009, 12:16 PM
Eset is the best security program and this is the answer to your question

-{ Quote: "It's been explained before, but basically the matousec tests are HIPS (host intrusion prevention system) tests. ESS anti-virus is disabled for the test so no chance of heuristic detection. ESS does not have HIPS (at least as far as the HIPS implementations used by the top scorers goes) and as long as it doesn't and the testing methodology remains the same, I'd expect similar results. Seriously if you're going test a security product, then test the entire product - not with half of it disabled. :wacko:" }-

ronjor
May 5th, 2009, 12:18 PM
Do a search for matousec in this forum. Plenty of threads exist such as this one. >>

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=220332


This thread is closed.