Xerobank log item question

[dan901]

Hi... A question about something I see in the xerobank 'best effort' log. Just reading and figuring stuff out in the log for curiosity's sake. Shadowvpn is the budget version of the full xerobank product, right? Why is Shadowvpn referenced in the log here? Just because it's part of the same family?


Wed Apr 01 16:04:35 2009 SENT CONTROL [vpngate.us.xerobank.com]: 'PUSH_REQUEST' (status=1)
Wed Apr 01 16:04:36 2009 PUSH: Received control message: 'PUSH_REPLY,comp-lzo yes,redirect-gateway,dhcp-option DNS 10.244.2.1,dhcp-option DOMAIN shadowvpn.com,route 10.0.24.1,topology net30,ping 5,ping-restart 100,ifconfig 10.0.24.14 10.0.24.13'

[SteveTX]

Probably the issue is that the exit node is in Netherlands sharing a crowding on ShadowVPN. I'll inquire.

[dan901]

I also see the shadowvpn reference in the ipconfig info.


>ipconfig /all

Windows IP Configuration

Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . :
Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . :
Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcast
IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : shadowvpn.com

Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 2:

Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : shadowvpn.com
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : TAP-Win32 Adapter V9

[geazer40]

{QUOTE-> Probably the issue is that the exit node is in Netherlands sharing a crowding on ShadowVPN. I'll inquire. <-QUOTE}


dont get me wrong to all the peeps who love xerobank but he should know the answer to that ? considering he is always on here saying how much xerobank is so good

why do you need to inquire ?

[3DFireStarteR]

{QUOTE-> dont get me wrong to all the peeps who love xerobank but he should know the answer to that ? considering he is always on here saying how much xerobank is so good

why do you need to inquire ? <-QUOTE}

It is kind of something you need to know since your primary focus is security and not knowing where your connections are routed is not security xD

[SteveTX]

I checked it out. It's part of the domain resolver. In this case it is a Xero Networks server running the resolver and a ShadowVPN node. It is an aesthetic issue only.

[dan901]

Thanks for the info, Steve