DefenseWall v2.51 released.

[Solaris]

changelog :

1. This build fixes a number of serious flows with the previous versions as well as a few kernel memory leaks.
2. System time protection is added.
3. Symbolic links protection is added.

[fce]

i try to install DW2.51 but KIS detected it as a trojan downloader (maybe FP ;D ) and it wont let me install it even i click "allow".

i guess its not the job of DW to fix the problem, but theyre loosing customer everytime AV tag DW as trojan downloader and wont let install it.

[Blackcat]

Is this version stable?;some of the previous pre-versions I have found to be unstable.

[Solaris]

Stable and smooth for me.
And yes, false positive is a problem ; and Prevx is not immune to that…

[Tony]

-{ Quote: "Is this version stable?;some of the previous pre-versions I have found to be unstable." }-
Yes this is the stable release version.
2.52 is the latest test release.

[Creer]

-{ Quote: "Stable and smooth for me.
And yes, false positive is a problem ; and Prevx is not immune to that…" }-
It is stable for me too, only previous versions (2.45) of DefenseWall with active-skin was unstable for me. New skinless v. works like a charm.
I sent to PrevX log file and they told me that the FP has been fixed.

[Blackcat]

Ilya has already released another test version, pre-2.52 and "this build fixes a few issues, the most important of which is CPU usage by periodical check functions".

[jmonge]

-{ Quote: "It is stable for me too, only previous versions (2.45) of DefenseWall with active-skin was unstable for me. New skinless v. works like a charm.
I sent to PrevX log file and they told me that the FP has been fixed." }-
yeap here too very stable and the only one that gave me trouble was the one with skin 2.45;)

[jmonge]

-{ Quote: "Stable and smooth for me.
And yes, false positive is a problem ; and Prevx is not immune to that…" }-prevx says it is malware;D ,i allow it:)

[ambient_88]

-{ Quote: "Ilya has already released another test version, pre-2.52 and "this build fixes a few issues, the most important of which is CPU usage by periodical check functions"." }-
I do hope that v2.52 fixes the CPU usage issue. As it is, DefenseWall uses a lot of CPU time, which really puzzles me. It's not like it has to scan every single file.

[jmonge]

-{ Quote: "I do hope that v2.52 fixes the CPU usage issue. As it is, DefenseWall uses a lot of CPU time, which really puzzles me. It's not like it has to scan every single file." }-that is very strange isue, are you getting the cpu very high when playing games?for long time?also check other security software there maybe a cpu leak between them;) i get alitle slow down when sandboxie is running and sandboxing IE;Dother wise is just fine here:)

[ambient_88]

-{ Quote: "that is very strange isue, are you getting the cpu very high when playing games?for long time?also check other security software there maybe a cpu leak between them;) i get alitle slow down when sandboxie is running and sandboxing IE;Dother wise is just fine here:)" }-
DefenseWall and Prevx EDGE are the only security applications I use (at the moment). Looking at SoftSphere's forum, others are also experiencing the same thing; that is, DefenseWall using a lot of CPU time.

Also, I've noticed that DefenseWall occasionally spikes when playing games. For this reason, I disable it whenever I play.

[jmonge]

-{ Quote: "DefenseWall and Prevx EDGE are the only security applications I use (at the moment). Looking at SoftSphere's forum, others are also experiencing the same thing; that is, DefenseWall using a lot of CPU time.

Also, I've noticed that DefenseWall occasionally spikes when playing games. For this reason, I disable it whenever I play." }-ah yeap with the games i know it goes slow did you post it there at the forum?

[Ilya Rabinovich]

-{ Quote: "Also, I've noticed that DefenseWall occasionally spikes when playing games. For this reason, I disable it whenever I play." }-
Try the latest pre-2.52 version. If it doesn't helps- contact me via support e-mail.

[Blackcat]

-{ Quote: " DefenseWall uses a lot of CPU time, which really puzzles me. It's not like it has to scan every single file." }-
It has always used up a lot of CPU Time.