View Full Version : PCSL Total Protection Testing Report (2008 NO.12)
yanzilme
December 14th, 2008, 03:31 PM
more information see PCSL official website
http://www.pcsecuritylabs.net/news.php?readmore=15
Fuzzfas
December 14th, 2008, 03:51 PM
Happy to be a Twistee! :argh: :thumb:
FDD works! Penalised by too many FP, as usual...
progress
December 14th, 2008, 03:54 PM
Gratulations 2 Panda, I am surprised ;)
clocks
December 14th, 2008, 03:59 PM
-{ Quote: "Happy to be a Twistee! :argh: :thumb:
FDD works! Penalised by too many FP, as usual..." }-
41 FPs! Yikes.....
BTW - that's an odd selection of software they choose.
Fuzzfas
December 14th, 2008, 04:16 PM
-{ Quote: "41 FPs! Yikes.....
BTW - that's an odd selection of software they choose." }-
FPs are a known issue with Twister, you learn to live with it. Besides, it keeps you alert. ;D
Where i say yikes is in paying a "yearly fee" in order to catch 0,1-0,9% more than Twister.
I think i will stay with my FPs... and the lifetime license. ;D
gery
December 14th, 2008, 04:42 PM
Trend Micro sucks . What a shame
bellgamin
December 14th, 2008, 05:02 PM
I cannot see the right part of the chart. It's blocked by that "shoutbox" nonsense. IMO it's a JUNK site as long as they have that sort of crapola.:thumbd:
Fuzzfas
December 14th, 2008, 05:11 PM
-{ Quote: "I cannot see the right part of the chart. It's blocked by that "shoutbox" nonsense. IMO it's a JUNK site as long as they have that sort of crapola.:thumbd:" }-
You mean you can't see the "Rate" column next to the "Total" column? I can see them... Anyway, i 've put a screenshot in Twister's topic too.
pcslinfo
December 14th, 2008, 05:14 PM
-{ Quote: "I cannot see the right part of the chart. It's blocked by that "shoutbox" nonsense. IMO it's a JUNK site as long as they have that sort of crapola.:thumbd:" }-
Sorry for my website on giving the problem of viewing. you are not using widescreen monitor, right?
I will redesign a website and it will be normally displayed on any kind of monitor. As we have pdf report for you to download , it contains more detailed information and once again, sorry for the problem:-[
http://www.pcsecuritylabs.net//document/PCSL%20Total%20Protection%20Testing%20Report%202008%20NO.12.zip
bellgamin
December 14th, 2008, 05:42 PM
-{ Quote: "Sorry for my website on giving the problem of viewing. you are not using widescreen monitor, right?" }-My monitor is 22" widescreen ViewSonic VX2235wm LCD.
I appreciate your fast response. I hope you can get your website to work right. In the meantime I have registered with your site & downloaded your 2 latest reports.
Einsturzende
December 14th, 2008, 05:49 PM
I would really like to see that 0.15% of undetected malware (by KIS), tested on execution against KIS 2009 (build 506) in advanced mode...
BTW. it would be not real problem to test on execution all undetected malware against all vendors suites/internet securities to see real and objective results...
Until that this is yet another test among many others ....
pcslinfo
December 14th, 2008, 05:57 PM
-{ Quote: "My monitor is 22" widescreen ViewSonic VX2235wm LCD.
I appreciate your fast response. I hope you can get your website to work right. In the meantime I have registered with your site & downloaded your 2 latest reports." }-
When I get time, I will redesign it ASAP;D
clocks
December 14th, 2008, 06:01 PM
-{ Quote: "When I get time, I will redesign it ASAP;D" }-
You have tested a lot of the Chinese vendors. Why not Rising? thanks!
pcslinfo
December 14th, 2008, 06:07 PM
-{ Quote: "You have tested a lot of the Chinese vendors. Why not Rising? thanks!" }-
We need to get authorization:)
Coolio10
December 14th, 2008, 06:29 PM
-{ Quote: "My monitor is 22" widescreen ViewSonic VX2235wm LCD.
I appreciate your fast response. I hope you can get your website to work right. In the meantime I have registered with your site & downloaded your 2 latest reports." }-
Same monitor and i have no problem.
Einsturzende
December 14th, 2008, 06:45 PM
It is resolution problem, not monitor problem...
firzen771
December 14th, 2008, 07:27 PM
my reso is 1680x1050 and im not getting that problem.
bellgamin
December 15th, 2008, 12:44 AM
@Einsturzend- Thanks. You are correct! If I go to a higher resolution, I can see all of PCSL's display. However, that resolution makes the text on all my apps too small for these tired old eyes. So I will stay as before. The lower resolution has never before caused this problem -- PCSL's site is the only one I cannot fully view -- so I'll just have to hope that PCSL fixes their website to accomodate folks on lower res because of poor eyesight.
JRViejo
December 15th, 2008, 01:36 AM
-{ Quote: "However, that resolution makes the text on all my apps too small for these tired old eyes." }-
bellgamin, just what the doctor ordered, Virtual Magnifying Glass (http://magnifier.sourceforge.net). I use it all the time.
Edit: There's a Portable Version (http://portableapps.com/apps/accessibility/virtual_magnifying_glass_portable) as well.
bellgamin
December 15th, 2008, 02:56 AM
-{ Quote: "...Virtual Magnifying Glass. I use it all the time." }-Thanks! I shall give it a try.
icr
December 15th, 2008, 07:21 AM
How come no Norton???
pcslinfo
December 15th, 2008, 09:32 AM
-{ Quote: "How come no Norton???" }-
We invite the AV vendor to join our testing platform and while we get the authorization, we add new vendors to our testing platform:)
Sputnik
December 15th, 2008, 11:07 AM
@pcslinfo
Thanks for your effort. One question, why is TrendMicro 16.1 used instead of 17.0?
Arup
December 15th, 2008, 11:25 AM
Before the usual detractors ( you know who you are ) get in, Avira seems to have aced this one as well, I guess their usual line would be, tests don't matter, they are all flawed. Anyways nice to see Avira being its consistent best as usual.
pcslinfo
December 15th, 2008, 11:26 AM
-{ Quote: "@pcslinfo
Thanks for your effort. One question, why is TrendMicro 16.1 used instead of 17.0?" }-
Trend Micro IS2009 simplified chinese edition is not finally been released yet, but next month's testing, you will see the new edition of Trend Micro:)
Sputnik
December 15th, 2008, 11:35 AM
@pcslinfo
You're right, the localized versions were planned for Q1 2009. In our labs we see lots of generic detections from TrendMicro's 8.9 engine on 0-day malware.
pcslinfo
December 15th, 2008, 11:41 AM
-{ Quote: "@pcslinfo
You're right, the localized versions were planned for Q1 2009. In our labs we see lots of generic detections from TrendMicro's 8.9 engine on 0-day malware." }-
yep:)
BTW, thank you for your consideration!
Sputnik
December 15th, 2008, 11:48 AM
@pcslinfo
No problem ;)
Anyway do you have access to TrendMicro's x.xxx.90 signatures (Beta)?
pcslinfo
December 15th, 2008, 11:59 AM
-{ Quote: "@pcslinfo
No problem ;)
Anyway do you have access to TrendMicro's x.xxx.90 signatures (Beta)?" }-
I will try to ask somebody in TM tomorrow and get back to you later;)
bellgamin
December 15th, 2008, 02:03 PM
@pcslinfo- Your site works just fine now. Fuzzfas taught me how to go to a higher resolution and still maintain a highly readable font.
Shazam! :thumb:
trjam
December 15th, 2008, 05:53 PM
-{ Quote: "Before the usual detractors ( you know who you are ) get in, Avira seems to have aced this one as well, I guess their usual line would be, tests don't matter, they are all flawed. Anyways nice to see Avira being its consistent best as usual." }-
Got the word.:thumb:
Kees1958
December 16th, 2008, 09:54 AM
-{ Quote: "My monitor is 22" widescreen ViewSonic VX2235wm LCD.
" }-
Dear Bellgamin,
You are nearly as old as Mozes, so the fact that your monitor is 22 inches wide does not mean anything with the font size and zoom factor you could be using at your age.
On the other had your sharp observations problably go hand in hand with sharp eye sight.
Cheers Kees
pcslinfo
December 17th, 2008, 03:11 AM
-{ Quote: "@pcslinfo
No problem ;)
Anyway do you have access to TrendMicro's x.xxx.90 signatures (Beta)?" }-
They said it is an internal pattern and only used in internal labs;D
progress
December 17th, 2008, 05:37 AM
-{ Quote: "Trend Micro sucks . What a shame" }-
Now you know why they don't take part in av-comparatives or vb100 :ouch:
GES/POR
December 17th, 2008, 11:06 AM
-{ Quote: "Now you know why they don't take part in av-comparatives or vb100 :ouch:" }-
System performence wise yes - Trend's a sucker, realworld malware detectionwise Trend's a whole lot better then for instance with AVG
Sputnik
December 17th, 2008, 11:15 AM
-{ Quote: "They said it is an internal pattern and only used in internal labs;D" }-
Yes I know, however some external labs use them too :)
-{ Quote: "System performence wise yes - Trend's a sucker, realworld malware detectionwise Trend's a whole lot better then for instance with AVG" }-
Performance wise they're improving. Their detection is good, we trend to see a lot of generic detections of 0-day malware by TrendMico while others ain't flagging it (yet).
pcslinfo
December 17th, 2008, 12:38 PM
-{ Quote: "Yes I know, however some external labs use them too :)" }-
yep:)
Are you interested in their 90 pattern?
cruelsister
December 17th, 2008, 12:46 PM
What sort of trash test is this??? Under Materials and Methods they list 2057 malicious samples. Of what? Anything from the last 5 years?
A couple of months ago this board tore apart and independent test from somewhere or other that used a whole lot more samples than this and at least gave a breakdown of what was used. Why are you guys letting this one slide?
pcslinfo
December 17th, 2008, 01:03 PM
-{ Quote: "What sort of trash test is this??? Under Materials and Methods they list 2057 malicious samples. Of what? Anything from the last 5 years?
A couple of months ago this board tore apart and independent test from somewhere or other that used a whole lot more samples than this and at least gave a breakdown of what was used. Why are you guys letting this one slide?" }-
First, please do read our testing report, the 2057 samples are the prevalent samples collected in 2008 October.
And please do not jump to conclusions while you are not familiar with the truth:)
I will be here if you have anything willing to know from us.;D
Sputnik
December 17th, 2008, 04:23 PM
-{ Quote: "yep:)
Are you interested in their 90 pattern?" }-
Actually we run the 90 pattern in our labs and I was wondering if you did too :)
pcslinfo
December 17th, 2008, 10:44 PM
-{ Quote: "Actually we run the 90 pattern in our labs and I was wondering if you did too :)" }-
how about the 90 pattern?
andyman35
December 18th, 2008, 12:12 PM
-{ Quote: "Before the usual detractors ( you know who you are ) get in, Avira seems to have aced this one as well, I guess their usual line would be, tests don't matter, they are all flawed. Anyways nice to see Avira being its consistent best as usual." }-
No matter which test you look at Avira always appears at the top end,either they're the luckiest vendor of all time or,it really is simply awesome.;)
Macstorm
December 18th, 2008, 12:30 PM
-{ Quote: "No matter which test you look at Avira always appears at the top end,either they're the luckiest vendor of all time or,it really is simply awesome.;)" }-
I'd say the latter 8)
Arup
December 19th, 2008, 11:11 AM
Its consistency and thats where they excel, they work hard and listen to feedback. They are not always going to be on top but even then, its their overall record that will always stand.
pcslinfo
December 19th, 2008, 01:41 PM
-{ Quote: "Its consistency and thats where they excel, they work hard and listen to feedback. They are not always going to be on top but even then, its their overall record that will always stand." }-
Thank you:)
And I will try my best to optimize our testing system and make our result more reasonable and better!
Have a nice day!
Regards
Jeffrey
steve1955
December 20th, 2008, 01:57 PM
-{ Quote: "What sort of trash test is this??? Under Materials and Methods they list 2057 malicious samples. Of what? Anything from the last 5 years?
A couple of months ago this board tore apart and independent test from somewhere or other that used a whole lot more samples than this and at least gave a breakdown of what was used. Why are you guys letting this one slide?" }-
why did they attack it,did nod do badly:-therefore a flawed test??
vBulletin® Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2012, Wilders Security Forums