Test again

[kloshar]

http://www.anti-virus-software-review.com/

You have probably seen this. Tell me your opinion.

[Pilli]

It looks more like a subjective review rather than a test.

- Toss a coin & buy from here :)

Seriously though, as there is no indication of the test parameters, for me, it has no credibility.

[bigc73542]

I have to agree with Pilli with out a list of what it was tested with this test is next to worthless.

[bellgamin]

This so-called AV review site shows a giant hypodermic, large splotches of dark red background, a plethora of ads, a display nearly 2 screens wide, NO hard data, & has every *selected* AV represented by a direct "Buy Now" click spot... how objective can it be? 8)

[kloshar]

I had to use a dictionary if I wanted to translate your text, bellgamin.

[nameless]

Maybe this AV product review is actually better than the others. After all, instead of "here's our super-duper AV testing methodolgy, which no one will agree with", they simply explain how the products look and work, so you can sort of "get a feel" for them. There is nothing wrong with that. The reviews I hate are the ones that do their own mysterious efficacy testing, and always seem to put NAV on top.

[Detox]

-{ Quote: " quoting: bellgamin link=board=24;threadid=21807;start=0#msg131055 date=1076746464]
This so-called AV review site shows a giant hypodermic, large splotches of dark red background, a plethora of ads, a display nearly 2 screens wide, NO hard data, & has every *selected* AV represented by a direct "Buy Now" click spot... how objective can it be? 8)
" }-

he said "bah this is no good"

;D

[meneer]

And it's getting a lot of hits this way ;)

There's a sister site as well:http://www.spamfilterreview.com

Looks the same, same test quality
At least these pages offer some charts to compare features, not detection rates...