PDA

View Full Version : Opinions Please..Mcafee & SAS


Atomic_Ed
July 27th, 2008, 08:22 PM
I wanted to get some opinions on my new combo in reference to spyware/malware detection/protection. I am running the latest Mcafee suite with AS and just purchased SAS lifetime license which seems to run fine along with Mcafee with no issues. However I feel pretty confident in the SAS capabilities but while I know there aren't alot of Mcafee fans on this board, I personally like the AV & Firewall. Never had any issues and I personally never felt the Mcafee AS portion was any good at all. So what does everyone think. Is SAS along with the Mcafee suite good enough or should I also need an on demand scanner too? Opinions are appreciated...

Forgot to mention I am running on Vista Home Premium SP1 x32

Someone
July 28th, 2008, 03:15 AM
Hi

I think it's quite safe, but you can add a sandbox.

ambient_88
July 28th, 2008, 03:20 AM
-{ Quote: "I wanted to get some opinions on my new combo in reference to spyware/malware detection/protection. I am running the latest Mcafee suite with AS and just purchased SAS lifetime license which seems to run fine along with Mcafee with no issues. However I feel pretty confident in the SAS capabilities but while I know there aren't alot of Mcafee fans on this board, I personally like the AV & Firewall. Never had any issues and I personally never felt the Mcafee AS portion was any good at all. So what does everyone think. Is SAS along with the Mcafee suite good enough or should I also need an on demand scanner too? Opinions are appreciated...

Forgot to mention I am running on Vista Home Premium SP1 x32" }-
I suggest adding Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware and a-squared Anti-Malware FREE. More blacklist scanners, better chances of detecting malware (but also higher FPs).

emperordarius
July 28th, 2008, 07:22 AM
I would suggest adding Ewido Micro Scanner/ Anti Spyware for occasional on demand scans.
I have used McAfee Anti Spyware before and it was quite weak, but I doubt that you'll need more than SAS + Ewido

ambient_88
July 28th, 2008, 09:25 AM
-{ Quote: "I would suggest adding Ewido Micro Scanner/ Anti Spyware for occasional on demand scans.
I have used McAfee Anti Spyware before and it was quite weak, but I doubt that you'll need more than SAS + Ewido" }-
Can you still download Ewido? AVG aquired Ewido, right?

emperordarius
July 28th, 2008, 09:59 AM
-{ Quote: "Can you still download Ewido? AVG aquired Ewido, right?" }-

Yes, you can download ewido anti spyware here http://filehippo.com/download_avg_antispyware/tech/1331/

and ewido Micro Scanner here http://downloads.ewido.net/ewido_micro.exe

Micro Scanner downloads every time the updates, and needs to installation, but suffers from lower removal rate than Ewido anti spyware overall.

Someone
July 28th, 2008, 10:46 AM
Hi

-{ Quote: "Yes, you can download ewido anti spyware here http://filehippo.com/download_avg_antispyware/tech/1331/

and ewido Micro Scanner here http://downloads.ewido.net/ewido_micro.exe

Micro Scanner downloads every time the updates, and needs to installation, but suffers from lower removal rate than Ewido anti spyware overall." }-
How long are the updates still going to be continued?

Thanks

emperordarius
July 28th, 2008, 10:47 AM
-{ Quote: "Hi


How long are the updates still going to be continued?

Thanks" }-

As long as AVG AS gets updated...Don't know exactly, but I think until the end of 2008.>:(

Someone
July 28th, 2008, 10:49 AM
Hi

-{ Quote: "As long as AVG AS gets updated...Don't know exactly, but I think until the end of 2008.>:(" }-
Thanks for the answer. So I guess it's not a permanent solution.:'(

emperordarius
July 28th, 2008, 10:56 AM
-{ Quote: "Hi


Thanks for the answer. So I guess it's not a permanent solution.:'(" }-

Yes...thanks to Grisoft>:(
Anyway SAS is very good, I think it will soon be more than enough ( if it isn't already). :thumb:

Atomic_Ed
July 28th, 2008, 11:00 PM
Thanks for the input guys I appreciate it and from what I can tell it appears I am fairly safe with this combo. I would rather not be messing with alot of FPs by overdoing it. So I will give this config a run for awhile and see what happens.