View Full Version : Heuristics av-test 10-2003 by checkvir.com!
Firefighter
February 5th, 2004, 02:25 PM
Hi everyone! Look at this!
Checkvir.com 10-2003, Heuristics av-test:
http://www.checkvir.com/index.php?CN=3.3.19&CIE=1
Summary report:
www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9295666~mode=flat (http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9295666~mode=flat)
"The truth is out there, but it hurts!"
Best regards,
Firefighter!
Added URL tags - Pieter
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=19869
Godzilla
February 5th, 2004, 02:49 PM
ROFL Bullstuff ;D
Did you take a look at the used virus samples ? muhahahaha ;D ;D ;D
I consider this as a joke ::)
edited to keep the language clean - Detox
Firefighter
February 5th, 2004, 03:09 PM
To Godzilla from Firefighter!
What I saw about the testbed in checkvir.com site that wasn't updated, because it seems to be in quick view the same as year 2002 testbed.
But there is said that those 27 files were ITW in 10-2003 test.
"The truth is out there, but it hurts!"
Best regards,
Firefighter!
bellgamin
February 5th, 2004, 05:34 PM
-{ Quote: " quoting: Godzilla link=board=24;threadid=21227;start=0#msg127803 date=1076010586]
I consider this as a joke ::)" }-
A joke? You are easily amused, I think.
Ah well... heur today, Guam to Maui. :D
mrtwolman
February 6th, 2004, 07:03 AM
Maybe i am totally dumb, but i did not understand the numbers on checkvir. Are those numbers detected or missed viruses ?
minacross
February 7th, 2004, 01:27 PM
-{ Quote: " quoting: mrtwolman link=board=24;threadid=21227;start=0#msg128042 date=1076068986]
Maybe i am totally dumb, but i did not understand the numbers on checkvir. Are those numbers detected or missed viruses ?
" }-
you're not the only one :-[ :-[
Madsen DK
February 7th, 2004, 01:31 PM
-{ Quote: " quoting: minacross link=board=24;threadid=21227;start=0#msg128496 date=1076178450]
-{ Quote: " quoting: mrtwolman link=board=24;threadid=21227;start=0#msg128042 date=1076068986]
Maybe i am totally dumb, but i did not understand the numbers on checkvir. Are those numbers detected or missed viruses ?
" }-
you're not the only one :-[ :-[
" }-
Certainly not. Me too ??? ???
Firefighter
February 7th, 2004, 02:54 PM
To everyone from Firefighter!
Maybe this link clarifies something to you?
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9295666~mode=flat
So, those numbers were the detected ones!
I've got DrWeb licence since 19. September 2002, so I think that the checked heurististic test was made about new VIRUS files from between 22. November 2002 and 11. August 2003, that's very possible, because it takes some time to collect over 1100 new VIRUS files from an independent institution that is not a virus collector!
The heuristics results were tested with DrWeb 4.29a version launched about 22. November 2002 and so must those versions of other programs be from!
The link about the testbed mentioned in that checkvir.com 10-2003 site have to be a bug, because it was the same as it was in the 4-2002 av-test. Otherways, how it is possible that all those av:s were almost uncapable to detect those files from 4-2002, if they were detected with updated versions after 7. April 2003?
"The truth is out there, but it hurts!"
Best regards,
Firefighter!
vBulletin® Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2012, Wilders Security Forums