View Full Version : W2K or TinyXP Rev09 ?
trdr
June 3rd, 2008, 12:09 AM
on my Celeron 500, 300+ ram I'm using W2K, just discovered Tiny and
wondering if it's worth installing instead of W2K — opinions ?
if you're using Tiny, which Option - 1-9 did you install and why ?
WSFuser
June 3rd, 2008, 12:59 AM
TinyXP is warez FYI. And besides you can create your own tiny XP with nLite.
For your computer I would use Windows 2000 or even liter: an nLited Windows 2000 ;D
farmerlee
June 3rd, 2008, 07:03 AM
yeh strip down win2000 and it will run lightning fast on your system..
huangker
June 3rd, 2008, 10:23 AM
Or a light version of Linux...
Kerodo
June 3rd, 2008, 05:35 PM
There is no comparison between 2k and Xp on an older machine, stick with Win2k, it's much faster and lighter overall....
trdr
June 3rd, 2008, 07:03 PM
I hadn't thought of Tiny in terms of warez, just that it was supposed
to be a 'fast version' of XP and that it was an 'auto' install
I know of nLite but not sure I have the technical skills I think may be
needed to 'liten' W2K
thanks for the replies
vBulletin® Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.