PDA

View Full Version : W2K or TinyXP Rev09 ?


trdr
June 3rd, 2008, 12:09 AM
on my Celeron 500, 300+ ram I'm using W2K, just discovered Tiny and
wondering if it's worth installing instead of W2K — opinions ?

if you're using Tiny, which Option - 1-9 did you install and why ?

WSFuser
June 3rd, 2008, 12:59 AM
TinyXP is warez FYI. And besides you can create your own tiny XP with nLite.

For your computer I would use Windows 2000 or even liter: an nLited Windows 2000 ;D

farmerlee
June 3rd, 2008, 07:03 AM
yeh strip down win2000 and it will run lightning fast on your system..

huangker
June 3rd, 2008, 10:23 AM
Or a light version of Linux...

Kerodo
June 3rd, 2008, 05:35 PM
There is no comparison between 2k and Xp on an older machine, stick with Win2k, it's much faster and lighter overall....

trdr
June 3rd, 2008, 07:03 PM
I hadn't thought of Tiny in terms of warez, just that it was supposed
to be a 'fast version' of XP and that it was an 'auto' install

I know of nLite but not sure I have the technical skills I think may be
needed to 'liten' W2K


thanks for the replies