PDA

View Full Version : PC Tools antivirus


bellgamin
February 18th, 2008, 04:23 PM
PCT's free antivirus began as a VirusBuster clone, but (per PCT) had been revised/upgraded by them. PCT AV's VirusBuster heritage led most folks to disdain its use because the Buster has done poorly in tests by AV-C, AV-Test.org, et alia.

HOWEVER, the Buster has been doing quite well in the recent tests by ShadowServer (http://www.shadowserver.org/wiki/pmwiki.php?n=Main.HomePage).

Further, PCT claims additional improvements have recently been made to its AV -- newly upgraded to version 4.0.0.25 (http://www.pctools.com/free-antivirus/download/) -- including but not necessarily limited to the following...

-{ Quote: "Enhanced Scanning with Intelli-scan
PC Tools AntiVirus 4 now includes Intelli-scan. Intelli-scan is a highly optimized scanning mode, designed to quickly scan your critical areas of your PC for active threats. A newly designed scan screen also provides you with the option to perform one of three scans: a Full or in-depth scan, a Custom Scan which lets you select specific locations to be included in scans, or an Intelli-Scan.

High-performance mode for File Guard
File Guard now includes a new higher performance mode of operation where it only scans active processes in real-time, instead of every file. This provides comprehensive real-time protection without excessive use of system resources.

Enhanced Threat Quarantine
The enhanced quarantine feature of PC Tools AntiVirus 4 allows selective quarantining of infected items into a contained area before disinfection. Once items are quarantined, they no longer pose any threat, and can be restored at a later time, if required.

New Email Guard
Email Guard, previously available as an add-on, has now been fully integrated into PC Tools AntiVirus. Email Guard provides comprehensive protection against threats attempting to access your computers via incoming emails. It also protects your contacts by stripping any virus from outgoing emails.

New Scanning Engine
PC Tools AntiVirus has a new scanning engine to provide enhanced virus threat detection. The new engine uses less system memory and requires smaller updates for new threat definitions." }-

RejZoR
February 19th, 2008, 12:59 PM
It's not the best but it's certanly doing pretty well. And can be used on corporate computers too. So if you want free AV for lets say company laptop, it's pretty much a no brainer... And if there wasn't avast! i'd probably be using it. It's pretty ok. Nice interface, install and forget default mode and not that bad detection. At least if you look at VB100% and other certifications (they don't mean world but AV certanly has to meet a certain degree of quality to pass them regardless).

bellgamin
February 19th, 2008, 03:58 PM
It would be my GUESS that the PCT antivirus probably does NOT cover spyware, inasmuch as PCT sells Spyware Doctor.

Does anyone know the FACTS about this matter????

computer geek
February 19th, 2008, 04:04 PM
-{ Quote: "It would be my GUESS that the PCT antivirus probably does NOT cover spyware, inasmuch as PCT sells Spyware Doctor.

Does anyone know the FACTS about this matter????" }-
no
No, not definately, but what would be the point of another product?

Woody777
February 19th, 2008, 04:38 PM
I used it on a Virtual Machine for a fewdays. It worked fine. I don't think its the worst AV but it is free & seemed to be reasonably decent.

cdmontfort
February 19th, 2008, 08:54 PM
Seems that it is included in Threatfire Pro version. Then with Threatfire's assistance seems like you would have sound protection.

Based on PCT statements regarding Spyware Doctor complimenting Threatfire's spyware et al. that the Anitvirus has little to no spyware protection.

Just assumptions on my part however.

aigle
February 20th, 2008, 12:15 AM
-{ Quote: "It would be my GUESS that the PCT antivirus probably does NOT cover spyware, inasmuch as PCT sells Spyware Doctor.

Does anyone know the FACTS about this matter????" }-

Seems correct.

http://www.pctools.com/forum/showthread.php?t=50669

Not a warm feeling.

s4u
February 20th, 2008, 01:52 AM
not very friendly

dan_maran
February 20th, 2008, 03:44 PM
Most free Anti-viruses don't offer Spyware protection.... Now if this AV didn't pick up the Trojan downloader(s) at all ever then I would state my issue, by not using it! But it is a simple missed sample **it happens all the time.

Jo Ann
February 20th, 2008, 03:59 PM
-{ Quote: "It would be my GUESS that the PCT antivirus probably does NOT cover spyware, inasmuch as PCT sells Spyware Doctor.

Does anyone know the FACTS about this matter????" }-
Your guess is correct, but there's always PCT Internet Security (http://www.pctools.com/internet-security/)! ;)

solcroft
February 21st, 2008, 12:23 AM
-{ Quote: "Most free Anti-viruses don't offer Spyware protection.... Now if this AV didn't pick up the Trojan downloader(s) at all ever then I would state my issue, by not using it! But it is a simple missed sample **it happens all the time." }-
Good to see at least someone has a sense of perspective.

Just head over to AV-C and read the reports - even the best scorers regularly miss thousands of samples. Making all this hulabaloo over ONE missed sample seems rather unnecessary to me.

aigle
February 21st, 2008, 05:43 AM
Point is not one missed sample. Point is that they replied in a way that this detection is not supposed to be the job of their AV.

solcroft
February 21st, 2008, 06:29 AM
-{ Quote: "Point is not one missed sample. Point is that they replied in a way that this detection is not supposed to be the job of their AV." }-
If by "they" you mean post number two in that thread, do note that the poster is more of a volunteer not necessarily armed with any real insight regarding the matter.

dan_maran
February 21st, 2008, 06:41 AM
-{ Quote: "Point is not one missed sample. Point is that they replied in a way that this detection is not supposed to be the job of their AV." }-

"They" didn't say that. A forums "helper" or "Expert Volunteer Guru" did. :)

aigle
February 21st, 2008, 07:51 AM
I did not notice that.

cp4eva
February 21st, 2008, 12:18 PM
Has anyone here tried it/comment on how light it may run?

aigle
February 21st, 2008, 01:16 PM
So does it cover spyware or not?

Wordward
March 11th, 2008, 10:56 PM
When I had it installed it ran very light at I believe around 5500K for two processes in Task Manager. It had over 364,000 Intelli-Signatures, but doesn't really cover spyware. It is a very nice free AV and the new engine is much better than that of Virusbusters. From what I can remember it updated ok and the GUI was typical PC Tools. Brightly colored blue's and whites and easy to understand.