PDA

View Full Version : Tutorial for NOD32 v3 ???


piranha
December 30th, 2007, 12:37 AM
Looking for a tutorial for nod32 v3.....

The only one i know is this one and it is very short.....??? :wacko:

http://my.opera.com/Stomyr/blog/how-to-install-the-new-nod32-v-3-x-and-configure-its-settings

Hiker
December 30th, 2007, 01:01 AM
{QUOTE-> Looking for a tutorial for nod32 v3.....

The only one i know is this one and it is very short.....??? :wacko:

http://my.opera.com/Stomyr/blog/how-to-install-the-new-nod32-v-3-x-and-configure-its-settings <-QUOTE}

What are you trying to do, install? Just uninstall any other AV you have on your computer now, exit any other applications and install. Have you username and password handy. Default settings are fine.

piranha
December 30th, 2007, 12:00 PM
{QUOTE-> What are you trying to do, install? Just uninstall any other AV you have on your computer now, exit any other applications and install. Have you username and password handy. Default settings are fine. <-QUOTE}

it is already installed, just want information about better settings then default

Hiker
December 30th, 2007, 12:21 PM
{QUOTE-> it is already installed, just want information about better settings then default <-QUOTE}

Oh OK. Other than the help section I don't know of any. :-[

ASpace
December 30th, 2007, 12:29 PM
{QUOTE-> just want information about better settings then default <-QUOTE}

What makes you think default settings are not "the better one" ?

piranha
December 30th, 2007, 12:52 PM
default setting = basic protection

it could be better and we can set other way. I tried but v3 have a bigger footprint than v2.7..... But for my P3 733, 512 ram, default settings seems better :(

wat0114
December 30th, 2007, 12:55 PM
{QUOTE-> default setting = basic protection
..... But for my P3 733, 512 ram.... :( <-QUOTE}

You should stick with 2.7 until you get a beefed up machine.

Bubba
December 30th, 2007, 01:18 PM
{QUOTE-> default setting = basic protection <-QUOTE}Similar comments using various words have cropped up since this release but so far none have mentioned which settings that are not part of the default\Typical(recommended best settings) they feel need adjustment. Other than a user needing to choose during installation whether to enable\disable potentially unwanted applications, the settings are about as strong as one could tweak them IMMHO.

Is your "basic protection" word usage and\or understanding based on word of mouth or do you have certain aspects of the install that you would further like to see tweaked in regards to protection ?

Bubba

piranha
December 30th, 2007, 06:24 PM
{QUOTE->
You should stick with 2.7 until you get a beefed up machine.
<-QUOTE}

I choose NOD32 for the best protection AND its little footprint because of my old pc. Version 3 works fine, just looking for the best setting my pc could handle... and that need some test of different settings ;)


{QUOTE-> Similar comments using various words have cropped up since this release but so far none have mentioned which settings that are not part of the default\Typical(recommended best settings) they feel need adjustment. Other than a user needing to choose during installation whether to enable\disable potentially unwanted applications, the settings are about as strong as one could tweak them IMMHO.

Is your "basic protection" word usage and\or understanding based on word of mouth or do you have certain aspects of the install that you would further like to see tweaked in regards to protection ?

Bubba <-QUOTE}

Sorry, english is not my first language.....

yes .....word of mouth as you said. Basic protection dont means it is not good, we can increase protection by custom settings

heu...... what means IMMHO ?

snowbound
December 30th, 2007, 06:39 PM
{QUOTE-> what means IMMHO ? <-QUOTE}
IMMHO=In My Most Humble Opinion



snowbound

piranha
December 30th, 2007, 07:51 PM
{QUOTE-> IMMHO=In My Most Humble Opinion



snowbound <-QUOTE}

:thumb: ;D

Sir George
December 31st, 2007, 08:32 AM
{QUOTE-> You should stick with 2.7 until you get a beefed up machine. <-QUOTE}

Totally ridiculous advice. The machine specs stated are easily sufficient to run version 2.x or version 3.x. I use some systems with less horsepower and there is no problem with any of them.

It benefits no one to post information that is inaccurate and misleading.

piranha
January 8th, 2008, 07:37 PM
{QUOTE-> Totally ridiculous advice. The machine specs stated are easily sufficient to run version 2.x or version 3.x. I use some systems with less horsepower and there is no problem with any of them.

It benefits no one to post information that is inaccurate and misleading. <-QUOTE}

I use default settings with minor customisation and nod32 run well and my old pc too ;)