EAV v. 3.0.560 available

[Marcos]

A newer EAV installer 3.0.560 is available for download from the download page (http://www.eset.com/download/registered_software.php). (the information on the website will be updated shortly)

- fixed problem with Outlook Express closing immediately after startup


It can be installed over the existing version. Please download and install it only if you are experiencing the aforementioned problem.

[HiTech_boy]

Any chance the update gets to the users automatically ?

[Steel]

Btw. from which side US or what ?

[HiTech_boy]

It should be eset.com ; even though it still says 3.0.551 , the server (d1) should have 3.0.560

[oldshep]

{QUOTE-> It should be eset.com ; even though it still says 3.0.551 , the server (d1) should have 3.0.560 <-QUOTE}

How does one get this update exactly? I'm using EAV 3.0.551 30 day trial on XP SP2 and I do see this problem with OE.

[HiTech_boy]

{QUOTE-> How does one get this update exactly? I'm using EAV 3.0.551 30 day trial on XP SP2 and I do see this problem with OE. <-QUOTE}


I am not if the trial version is/will be updated , ESET Mods can say . You get the latest installer .560 and apply it over the current version :)

[Steel]

{QUOTE-> It should be eset.com ; even though it still says 3.0.551 , the server (d1) should have 3.0.560 <-QUOTE}
I do it, but after downloading it says delete or repair ??? Well, i try a repair and finally it's the same Version as before. Build 551.

:thumb:

[Steel]

Now, what to do ? I think, updating the Version (link ) is much more important then updating the info about the new installer ::)

Can we have a Link to the newest installer EAV Build 560 please ?

[oldshep]

{QUOTE-> I do it, but after downloading it says delete or repair ??? Well, i try a repair and finally it's the same Version as before. Build 551.

:thumb: <-QUOTE}
Exact same here. I downloaded the installer from the UK website. The website said v3.0.560 ???

[Donald®]

{QUOTE-> Can we have a Link to the newest installer EAV Build 560 please ? <-QUOTE}
http://www.eset.co.uk/download/registered_software.php ;D :thumb:

[HiTech_boy]

The links in the UK site are the same as in the USA site . They both lead to download1.eset.com server

[GAN]

{QUOTE-> http://www.eset.co.uk/download/registered_software.php ;D :thumb: <-QUOTE}
It says version 3.0.56, but it's still the old 3.0.551 pointing to
http://download1.eset.com/download/win/eav/eav_nt32_enu.msi

[HiTech_boy]

This should be the link . It contains the newest possible download

[ellison64]

Well i downloaded and installed ,after an email from tech support suggesting i try that build ( i had ekrn.exe shutting down and freezing my pc).I am most disappointed to see that after installation it ,still shows .551 version in "about" tab.Im also confused that marcos seems to suggest that only an Outlook express bug has been fixed in that build?.This is starting to become rather annoying ,confusing and more trouble than the worth.
ellison

[Steel]

I 've tried it again. And, after downloading it shows me Repair or Remove ? So what's going on here ? :o

No installing over the old one possible. >:(

[HiTech_boy]

{QUOTE-> I 've tried it again. And, after downloading it shows me Repair or Remove ? So what's going on here ? :o

No installing over the old one possible. >:( <-QUOTE}


You must choose Repair and this is supposed to install over the existing one (repair or upgrade to new version)

[GAN]

{QUOTE-> I 've tried it again. And, after downloading it shows me Repair or Remove ? So what's going on here ? :o

No installing over the old one possible. >:( <-QUOTE}
The new version isn't there yet so what you been doing is to download version 3.0.551 and run the installer. Since it's the same version as you already have installed the only option given is repair and uninstall.
The only thing you can do is to wait for 3.0.560....

[Steel]

Something does not seem here to tune. All the same where one looks and tries, everywhere ' s gives only Build to 551.

Why doesn't ESET give us simply a left to the newest EAV and a left to the newest ESS?

Where is the problem?

Ask finally clear statements!!!


@Hitech

As I already said, bring nothing to Repair. Subsequently, the Build is still 551.

What proceeds here momentarily?

On a side the information is not correct, but the left to the new Build. On the other side nothing at all does not stand. All sides have one together, it remain always the old Build. All the same which one does.

[oldshep]

{QUOTE-> You must choose Repair and this is supposed to install over the existing one (repair or upgrade to new version) <-QUOTE}

I can confirm that this fixes nothing. I downloaded the "new" installer form the UK website. The website stated "V3.0.560". After the download, I ran the installer without uninstalling 3.0.551. The installer message says uninstall or repair. I choose repair. The installer does its thing, and asks for a reboot. After reboot, EAV help, about says V3.0.551. The OE problem remains.

I can only surmise from this that the link on the UK website is still pointing to the 3.0.551 installer.

[Steel]

@Marcos, whats going on here ?

[laurent]

The announcement seems faster than the update

[HiTech_boy]

{QUOTE-> The website stated "V3.0.560". After the download, I ran the installer without uninstalling 3.0.551 <-QUOTE}

It really doesn't matter what a site says because this is just a text , text and nothing but text . Instead of writing v3.0.560 , they can write 4.32.775 but as lonsg as the link in the background leads to v3.0.551 , the fact that it would be 4 on the site is not important .

As you all say you have downloaded again and your ESET products still say 551 , then it is obvious that you should wait until they load the new version on the servers :thumb: The link should be the same

[Steel]

Sorry, but all this makes momentarily no professional impression.

@hightech

None speaks of wrong text. We said all already from the beginning, the Build after downloading is still the old.

Clearly we must now wait. But, the information was then evenly wrong. Why however doesn't that say anybody of ESET?

They leave us alone staying into rain, after an much to early information. I find, they have communicate with eachother ESET to ESET before posting such a info to the customer.

[oldshep]

{QUOTE-> It really doesn't matter what a site says because this is just a text , text and nothing but text . Instead of writing v3.0.560 , they can write 4.32.775 but as lonsg as the link in the background leads to v3.0.551 , the fact that it would be 4 on the site is not important .

As you all say you have downloaded again and your ESET products still say 551 , then it is obvious that you should wait until they load the new version on the servers :thumb: The link should be the same <-QUOTE}

All of your observations are now completely obvious. As they say, hindsight is 20-20. So why was this thread started and a new installer announced if no-one knows where to download it from?

[Steel]

Thats the jumping point. It was meant good, but in the wrong order. For Hightech, sorry, this mark are appropriate you completely wrongly. Where's is the official word from Marcos ? He announced something, and his colleages don't so it.

[saffron]

{QUOTE-> A newer EAV installer 3.0.560 is available for download from the download page (http://www.eset.com/download/registered_software.php). (the information on the website will be updated shortly)

- fixed problem with Outlook Express closing immediately after startup


It can be installed over the existing version. Please download and install it only if you are experiencing the aforementioned problem. <-QUOTE}

Is that the only bug fixed from the plague? EAV3 still has more reported bugs than a bed in a Calcutta brothel.

I am VERY disappointed with all this. I have never seen such a terrible release. Eset's previous fine reputation is flushing down the toilet.

[Steel]

Thank you very much ESET leaving us alone after this announcement without further infos or instructions. ???

[saffron]

{QUOTE-> Thank you very much ESET leaving us alone after this announcement without further infos or instructions. ??? <-QUOTE}

The speed of information coming back from Eset used to be quite good, but now it is truly terrible. It seems like they have more bugs and problems than they can handle quickly.

[GAN]

{QUOTE-> Thank you very much ESET leaving us alone after this announcement without further infos or instructions. ??? <-QUOTE}
I'm sure Marcos posted based on the information he got, but the file is obviously the same old 3.0.551. I'm sure he is looking into this and i guess this will be sorted out pretty soon. Anyway there isn't much we can do and doesn't really help to post a complaint every 2 minutes. I guess it's not the end of the world if we have to wait for one more hour to get the 3.0.560 release. It's not like i think eset done everything right in this case, but i don't think all of this complaints will help getting an answer from Marcos or anyone else from eset. If the new version is available for download soon then at least they might have fixed one bug 1 day after the release. Hopefully they will solve several more during this week and the next.

I think the top priority for eset is to fix the bugs and probably working hard and as fast as they can. Then it might be hard for the developers to give information about the latest status so it can be posted on this board fast enough.

[WilliamP]

560 is there now. Can we download over 551?

[GAN]

{QUOTE-> 560 is there now. Can we download over 551? <-QUOTE}
As Marcos said in the first post: Yes you can upgrade from .551.

And by the way it's still the same old .551 even if the text says .560.

[nodHead]

{QUOTE-> Is that the only bug fixed from the plague? EAV3 still has more reported bugs than a bed in a Calcutta brothel.

I am VERY disappointed with all this. I have never seen such a terrible release. Eset's previous fine reputation is flushing down the toilet. <-QUOTE}

Seems like a company in chaos. Perhaps what they need is a group of beta testers that do have some compensation for testing and submitting feedback, no one likes to submit feedback for free when the company at the end of it all makes serious money from the release.

Yeah, I'm hearing toilets flushing here too. :-\

[WilliamP]

After downloading 560 the task bar icon still says 551

[saffron]

{QUOTE-> I'm sure Marcos posted based on the information he got, but the file is obviously the same old 3.0.551. I'm sure he is looking into this and i guess this will be sorted out pretty soon. Anyway there isn't much we can do and doesn't really help to post a complaint every 2 minutes. I guess it's not the end of the world if we have to wait for one more hour to get the 3.0.560 release. It's not like i think eset done everything right in this case, but i don't think all of this complaints will help getting an answer from Marcos or anyone else from eset. If the new version is available for download soon then at least they might have fixed one bug 1 day after the release. Hopefully they will solve several more during this week and the next.

I think the top priority for eset is to fix the bugs and probably working hard and as fast as they can. Then it might be hard for the developers to give information about the latest status so it can be posted on this board fast enough. <-QUOTE}

I am a new poster at Wilder's but I have been a reader for years so I am not such a real newbie. :) I don't think anybody blames Marcos personally for Eset's stuff ups. He is just the guy with the target on his shirt. He tries his best.

[Joliet Jake]

A whole lot of weeping over very little imo. I remain unperturbed. 8) ;D

[saffron]

{QUOTE-> A whole lot of weeping over very little imo. I remain unperturbed. 8) ;D <-QUOTE}

Your faint whisper of praise is lost in the roar of disapproval from the multitude. :)

[ellison64]

{QUOTE-> A whole lot of weeping over very little imo. I remain unperturbed. 8) ;D <-QUOTE}

I guess your right. Version 2.7 and rc1 works,so bugger it ,im not installing any other build version ,as what im seeing here seems to indicate quite a few build releases being churned out over the coming weeks.
ellison

[GAN]

{QUOTE-> I guess your right. Version 2.7 and rc1 works,so bugger it ,im not installing any other build version ,as what im seeing here seems to indicate quite a few build releases being churned out over the coming weeks.
ellison <-QUOTE}
I'm still at 2.7 and working great....i don't really need a new version, but when stable i will probably upgrade. Not sure why some people must have the latest version today when it's not working for them. I'm sure most could live a happy life with the previous version for some more days/weeks.

[GAN]

Version 3.5.560 is finally available. Can find it here:
http://www.eset.com/download/registered_software.php

This time the file is actually version 3.0.560 and not only the text that claim it's a new release.

[Escalader]

{QUOTE-> I'm still at 2.7 and working great....i don't really need a new version, but when stable i will probably upgrade. Not sure why some people must have the latest version today when it's not working for them. I'm sure most could live a happy life with the previous version for some more days/weeks. <-QUOTE}

My Nod 32 still at 2.7. It runs well, doesn't cause me troubles.

Based on the posts here, I will hold off on V3 til it is as stable as 2.7.:'(

I don't know why this has happened in this case, but a list from Wilder's forums alone from 2007 would produce quite a list of premature buggy releases. It is becoming an unacceptable norm.

IMHO, we shoot ourselves in the foot by pressing these firms to meet deadlines for releases that were set by whom? The marketing guys maybe?
How many new sales will they have today with all these posts?

We post stuff like it was supposed to be out on X where is it, it is finally out, well be carefull what you ask for you may get it (early it would seem)

This SW industry seems to lack quality control on it's new products. Even car companies now know how to do that!

Some day a SW firm will build and keep a good reputation by releasing new versions/ builds when they are debugged and stable in real beta tests.

This is sad and avoidable.

[Thankful]

If Eset, or any company waited until all bugs were eliminated, they would never release software.

[WilliamP]

Not making any excuses for Eset but I worked 30 years in the airline industry and 12 in the automotive. Everything has bugs and has to be corrected after they hit the masses.

[nodHead]

{QUOTE-> If Eset, or any company waited until all bugs were eliminated, they would never release software. <-QUOTE}

Then maybe they need a hard core group of beta testers to squash more bugs than are currently being squashed by the ESET team internally.:isay:

[TJP]

Just installed .560 over the top of the .551 version without any issues.

Again, I must be one of the fortunate few posting on Wilders as I've encountered zero problems thus far.

Hopefully those of you with problems get them resolved ASAP.

Cheers.

[oldshep]

{QUOTE-> Just installed .560 over the top of the .551 version without any issues.

Again, I must be one of the fortunate few posting on Wilders as I've encountered zero problems thus far.

Hopefully those of you with problems get them resolved ASAP.

Cheers.
<-QUOTE}

I just did the install of .560 over .551 as well. All went smoothly and my Outlook express issue seems to be resolved. Thanks to all concerned.

[nodyforever]

Link trial version 560?

[poutine]

{QUOTE-> I just did the install of .560 over .551 as well. All went smoothly and my Outlook express issue seems to be resolved. Thanks to all concerned. <-QUOTE}

Yep, mines ok to. ;)

[nodyforever]

@poutine

Can you tell me that where I can obtain the link trial of the version 560?


Thanks

[Thankful]

http://www.eset.com/download/registered_software.php

[Gez]

NOD32 version 3.0.551.0
Windows XP Pro, SP2 with Sunbelt Kerio 4.5.916

I find this thread very frustrating. I've had problems with NOD32 in the past and I'm not here to defend Eset but it's absolutely pointless saying you have problems and this and that without specifying the OS you use, and other security software which might be in conflict with NOD32.
I'm having no problems whatsoever with the latest release, though I don't doubt for one minute people are having problems. It's just that it would help greatly if I knew whether or not they were using Vista, for example, or some other spyware program. That way we can determine whether there's a pattern.

[nodyforever]

{QUOTE-> http://www.eset.com/download/registered_software.php <-QUOTE}


I did not want the link for a version with user and password but yes for a version trial straight ::) :o >:( :(

[nodHead]

{QUOTE-> I did not want the link for a version with user and password but yes for a version trial straight ::) :o >:( :( <-QUOTE}

http://download1.eset.com/eval/win/eav/eav_nt64_enu.msi
64-bit

http://download1.eset.com/eval/win/eav/eav_nt32_enu.msi
32-bit

Not sure if it's the new build.

[nodyforever]

{QUOTE-> http://download1.eset.com/eval/win/eav/eav_nt64_enu.msi
64-bit

http://download1.eset.com/eval/win/eav/eav_nt32_enu.msi
32-bit

Not sure if it's the new build. <-QUOTE}



Version 551 :wacko: :wacko: :wacko: :'(


Thanks for help

[oldshep]

Sad to report, my Outlook express just glitched out again. It only happened once - first time opening after reboot. Tried to start OE, got the Windows clang, the OE window flashed but did not open. Clicked OE again and it started properly.

One other issue with V3.0.560, the first reboot after installing it on top of 3.0.551, the "Automatic real time file system protection startup" didn't work. I checked the setup tree and this option was not checked and I'm quite sure I didn't uncheck it. Got the windows security center warning at startup about no AV running... I checked the box and restarted and the AV protection was OK. Then I tried to open OE and got the clang. Starting to feel like a beta tester:wacko:

My system is Win XP Pro SP2. Other security apps in sig.

[Supersnake]

{QUOTE-> Sad to report, my Outlook express just glitched out again. It only happened once - first time opening after reboot. Tried to start OE, got the Windows clang, the OE window flashed but did not open. Clicked OE again and it started properly. <-QUOTE}

I am happy to report that V3.0.560.0 has indeed corrected the problem for me. Have accessed OE at least 40 or fifty times over the past three hours without an occurrence of the Crash Upon Launch problem. I was one who posted in two threads that I too was experiencing the problem and to the point of wanting to revert back to v 2.7 because of it.

Am still experiencing some lag upon exit, however it lags for only about 2 seconds which is something I can easily overlook.

[nodyforever]

Trial version tested links download1, download2 and download3 servers version 551 :gack: :gack: :gack: :gack: :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(

[oldshep]

{QUOTE-> I am happy to report that V3.0.560.0 has indeed corrected the problem for me. Have accessed OE at least 40 or fifty times over the past three hours without an occurrence of the Crash Upon Launch problem. <-QUOTE}

What about right after a reboot? That now seems to be the only time I get the crash.

[Escalader]

{QUOTE-> Sad to report, my Outlook express just glitched out again. It only happened once - first time opening after reboot. Tried to start OE, got the Windows clang, the OE window flashed but did not open. Clicked OE again and it started properly.

One other issue with V3.0.560, the first reboot after installing it on top of 3.0.551, the "Automatic real time file system protection startup" didn't work. I checked the setup tree and this option was not checked and I'm quite sure I didn't uncheck it. Got the windows security center warning at startup about no AV running... I checked the box and restarted and the AV protection was OK. Then I tried to open OE and got the clang. Starting to feel like a beta tester:wacko:

My system is Win XP Pro SP2. Other security apps in sig. <-QUOTE}

Hi oldshep:

With zass are there any known clashes/conflicts with EAV, Nod etc? I mean known in the sense of posted on the various support centers or forums?

This is as you know, not a challenge question.

In Nod 32, I like to except other security software so it doesn't scan their peers and block/disable etc etc. IMHO. This is one of my policies for security software.

[oldshep]

{QUOTE-> Hi oldshep:

With zass are there any known clashes/conflicts with EAV, Nod etc? I mean known in the sense of posted on the various support centers or forums?

This is as you know, not a challenge question.

In Nod 32, I like to except other security software so it doesn't scan their peers and block/disable etc etc. IMHO. This is one of my policies for security software. <-QUOTE}

Hi Escalader. None with Nod32. Not sure about EAV. All premissions in pgm control are given. If it looks like my installtion is the only one with a problem, I may try a reinstall later.

[andy2008]

:thumb: I hope they sorted the gui in exluded addresses in advanced setup or theres not much point updating. Can someone post a screenshot of excluded addresses (with no addresses in the list) thanks

[Escalader]

{QUOTE-> Not making any excuses for Eset but I worked 30 years in the airline industry and 12 in the automotive. Everything has bugs and has to be corrected after they hit the masses. <-QUOTE}

Hi WilliamP:

Can't agree with the idea that SW products or flu serum have to be corrected by mass exposure. ;D

Here is something on quality control I just received from a professional organization seminar write up. I can't id it here. But if we substituted EAV for automobile, electricity, etc and SW bug for repair, no lights etc it would be an interesting "paper". Note that GE etc are in competitive business's and have increased revenue.

Take it easy:thumb:

{QUOTE-> If your automobile ran at Six-Sigma (6S), there would be 1.2 seconds
of repair per 100 hours of operation; at 4S, that statistic would
increase to 37 repair minutes per 100 hours of operation. If electricity
worked at 6S, there would be no lights for about two minutes per year,
while at 4S, there would be no lights for about one hour per week.
6S is a statistical measure of the performance of a process or product
characteristic compared to a customer specification level. To achieve
a 6S level of performance, a systematic, process-based methodology and
project framework must be employed. The 6S statistical methods must
operate within a defined deployment structure, which involves the
development of personnel at various levels within the organization to
operate and lead the 6S implementation program.
A concept with more than 200 years of history, 6S continues to evolve
as a powerful tool supporting business excellence. In recent years,
Motorola, Honeywell and General Electric have documented savings in the
order of 1.2% to 4.5% of revenue directly attributable to their 6S
programs. <-QUOTE}

[beynac]

Hi oldshep.

After installing v3, I was getting a 'code injection' warning from Sunbelt Personal Firewall (SPF) the first time I opened Outlook Express after a reboot. (Screenshot link (http://www.bucherie.freesurf.fr/eset.jpg)). OE appeared to work properly once I closed the warning and I could re-open it without getting the warning. I updated to the latest release (3.0.560.0) and still got the same problem. I've now 'allowed' the ESET service in the HIPS section of SPF and had no further bother.

I hope this info' may give a clue to cause of the problem.

[Supersnake]

{QUOTE-> What about right after a reboot? That now seems to be the only time I get the crash. <-QUOTE}

Just tried a reboot and went immediately to OE - no crash.

[poutine]

{QUOTE-> Just tried a reboot and went immediately to OE - no crash. <-QUOTE}

Yeh i just tried that to ..no crash.

[oldshep]

Thanks poutine and Supersnake. Sounds like I need to try a clean reinstall.

[andy2008]

never hurts to do a clean reinstall. Make sure you also get rid of the eset data in documents and settings :thumb:

[poutine]

{QUOTE-> Thanks poutine and Supersnake. Sounds like I need to try a clean reinstall. <-QUOTE}

Good luck oldshep. let us know how it goes. :)

[WizardMaster]

I realised, I read everyone have complaint about EAV release still trouble. You said .551 was perfect then .560 is not perfect.

When I get download ESS (BETA) was problem freeze a OE. I gave it up, return to NOD32 v2.7 was fine on us.

Everyone are right. because many million are different software or 3rd party software been installed. EAV or ESS might be very carefully and test a working with it. Many Forum users are alway right way been told to ESET Development Team should be fix a correct. Until Forum user feel very happy with it and most less or very few a complaint. Finaly to released version it.

If ESET Team ignore you, A million will not buy ESET will be loser against Forum user told been to ESET must be fix immediate... on next .561 or whatever.

[Thankful]

{QUOTE-> I realised, I read everyone have complaint about EAV release still trouble. You said .551 was perfect then .560 is not perfect.

When I get download ESS (BETA) was problem freeze a OE. I gave it up, return to NOD32 v2.7 was fine on us.

Everyone are right. because many million are different software or 3rd party software been installed. EAV or ESS might be very carefully and test a working with it. Many Forum users are alway right way been told to ESET Development Team should be fix a correct. Until Forum user feel very happy with it and most less or very few a complaint. Finaly to released version it.

If ESET Team ignore you, A million will not buy ESET will be loser against Forum user told been to ESET must be fix immediate... on next .561 or whatever. <-QUOTE}

Believe me, Eset will not ignore the forum members. All the problems will be solved. Please have a little patience.

[oldshep]

{QUOTE-> Good luck oldshep. let us know how it goes. :) <-QUOTE}

And now I can't reproduce the error either ???

I haven't changed anything or re-installed. But after 5 reboots, I can't generate the error with OE. Oh well, I guess I should be grateful and just move on ;D

[NodboN]

{QUOTE-> EAV3 still has more reported bugs than a bed in a Calcutta brothel. <-QUOTE}

Hi saffron,
I like your sense of humor - on second thoughts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . maybe, you were NOT joking ;D