What you will recommend?

[tsilo]

Hi there
I am interesting anti-malware productes that don't use signatures detection, but uses behavior analyser or heuristic detection. I only know Cyberhawk and Norton Anti-Bot.What are other such productes and which one you will recommend?

[walking paradox]

You might want to have a look here (http://wiki.castlecops.com/Different_classes_of_security_software#Behaviorial_blockers:-). It describes behavior blocking technology and provides a fairly exhaustive list of the behavior blockers.

[tsilo]

:) thanks for this site but I posted here because I want an opinion of users which one is the best, which have best detection and less FP-s.

[EASTER.2010]

System Safety Monitor is never, and i quote again "NEVER" false positived on anything but then it can't. It intercepts nearly EVERY code signalling the system from executables to drivers/services etc.

It's not let me down yet, either testing rootkits or malware sites that slip downloaders in thru IE. I guess the BEST coding technique microsoft made available is the SUSPEND instruction that allows to interupt & hold any file at bay untill the user issues a command to either DENY or ACCEPT passage. Once your decision/rules are applied it becomes automatic from there on out.

[bellgamin]

I recommend System Safety Monitor paid version, & agree with reasons listed by Easter.2010.