Have you switched to NOD32 due to stability problems with KAV?

[AlamoCity]

If so, could you please describe the issues you were experiencing that motivated you to dump KAV.

Thanks in advance!

[disinter1]

Well, I have trialed both and Nod32 hardly gave me problems at all. On KAV my computer went to a drag and was very slow to respond, specially on my web surfing. Both are good products, and can't go wrong either way.;D

[lucas1985]

And some people switched to KAV due to the PDM and/or detection rates.
DrWeb users praise the tiny updates, the lightweight realtime scanner and the superb support.
Avast users swear by the shields, the boot-time scanner and the stability.
AVG users like the fool-proof GUI and the detection rates are improving (ask Firecat).
Some people have stayed with F-Prot since the DOS scanner and now the detection rates are very good. Support is excellent.
And so on.

[sockie]

KAV slowed my machine down too much and what annoyed me too was the crappy 4KB/sec download speeds I was getting when KAV was updating. Also, as mentioned in another thread, KAV missed a virus. :thumbd:

[TonyW]

-{ Quote: "KAV missed a virus. :thumbd:" }-I hope you submitted that missed sample to the KL Virus Analysts.

[WSFuser]

I only switched to NOD32 because Im using Server 2003. On XP though, KAV worked fine for me.

[LowWaterMark]

This topic was started with nothing but trolling intent. Thread closed.

People should know better than to reply to trolls from people who start far too many posts in just a few days pitting one product against another.