View Full Version : Which is the more secure setup?
Diprivan
April 30th, 2007, 09:36 AM
I have settled on two security configurations. Which one would be more secure for a high risk surfer? Would anyone suggest an alternative setup?
Setup 1:
Prevx1
Antivir PE Premium
Win XP Pro firewall
BOClean
GEsWall 2.6 RC1
Spywareblaster
Linkscanner Pro 2.6
FDISR
Firefox 2.0.0.3
Setup 2:
NIS 2007
GEsWall 2.6 RC1
Spywareblaster
Linkscanner Pro 2.6
Firefox 2.0.0.3
WSFuser
April 30th, 2007, 10:21 AM
This setup would be good:
KIS6
Prevx1
BOClean
LinkScanner Pro
Firefox
Diprivan
April 30th, 2007, 10:26 AM
Thanks WSFuser
I have decided to combine Prevx1 with NIS 2007 (setup 2). However, I am a little concerned that Prevx1 might conflict with NIS.
screamer
April 30th, 2007, 10:30 AM
{QUOTE-> I have settled on two security configurations. Which one would be more secure for a high risk surfer? Would anyone suggest an alternative setup?
<-QUOTE}
I'm an extremely "High Risk" surfer and to be quite frank, I've never really had an issue (knock wood) w/ the setup in my sig.
FD-ISR & ATI as insurance policies ;)
...screamer
WSFuser
April 30th, 2007, 10:31 AM
I have not tried that combination, but Prevx1 generally gets along with antivirus programs so it should be ok.
Pedro
April 30th, 2007, 11:21 AM
If you use XP Firewall, check out FirePanel XP. This allows you to monitor connections and permitions easier.
If there's a better one, i don't know.
vBulletin® Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.