View Full Version : boclean fp
iceni60
April 27th, 2007, 05:10 PM
boclean flagged this when i ran it. http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/iecookies.html i haven't run it with other scanners. i used to like windows security, but after 2 days of running XP again i'm already sick of it.
argus tuft
April 27th, 2007, 09:09 PM
Hi, quoting Kevin McA from a post at BOClean forums (http://forums.comodo.com/index.php/topic,7808.0.html)
{QUOTE-> ... Perfect example of this is MIRC variants, NIRSOFT utilties and a raft of others for which we'd been accused of "false-positiving" on ... our REASON for covering these was that they were the CORE COMPONENTS of many "pseudo-rootkits and bots" which were designed SOLELY on their "legitimate usage" and ignored by the others. After our "netbus" episode, BOClean begat a "protected EXCLUDER" for such situations. If you really INTENDED to run it, then you can manually exclude it in BOClean <-QUOTE}.
iceni60
April 28th, 2007, 11:48 AM
thanks, like i said i'm already sick of windows security. i've decided not to run windows so it's not a problem for me anymore.
Mrkvonic
April 29th, 2007, 02:34 AM
Hello,
ice, you've taken it too hard. I have told you in another thread that all you need is Double F = Firewall + Firefox. Playing with security is ok only if you love the fun of it.
Mrk
Cerxes
April 29th, 2007, 03:29 AM
Have to agree with you there Mrk, I´m running several of the well known security software here, and never counter any malware any longer. Maybe because I´m not a risky surfer any longer. So I think I will delete some of the softwares. I´m running Win XP nowdays only when I´m gaming, and slowly using more and more FreeBSD and also testing out several Linux distros for everyday working/surfing.
However, it feels important to stress that ignoring security issues only because one is running an OS that is much lesser a target for malware writers, could be a mistake that could punish the community/users later on when those future malwares are spreading themselves with the "speed of light". At least a firewall and also an AV I think should be regarded as a good standard protection in conjuction with the other things that makes those OS such a great piece of work.
/Cerxes.
iceni60
April 29th, 2007, 01:04 PM
i used to like windows security, all i'm saying is i no longer like it, i prefer using linux so there's no reason for me to run windows. i was thinking of doing windows OS hardening for people in my local area as i do it every so often for friends and friends of friends, i'm not sure now.
{QUOTE-> However, it feels important to stress that ignoring security issues only because one is running an OS that is much lesser a target for malware writers, could be a mistake <-QUOTE}
in linux i have no real-time security programs running apart from a FW. i have an AV which i run against files from untrusted places, rootkit scanners, a system checksum checker and a kernel level application FW - actually that runs in real-time. so, i don't ignore linux security. i just no longer like windows security.
vBulletin® Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.