halcyon
April 24th, 2007, 03:32 AM
Has anybody seen / done an up to date version of current:
Risk & attack types
- viruses, worms
- trojans, rootkits
- malware, adware
- dialers
- bots, zombie controllers
- outgoing attacks, sw firewall removers
- password sniffers, password scanners, password hackers
AND
Protection & Security software
- Anti-virus software
- Anti-trojan & malware software
- Software firewalls (incl.
- HIPS
- Sandboxes
- etc.
I'm not looking for a complete list of application names, but more like categories of different risk/attack types vs. various protection/scanner software.
Also, what categories of risks are growing the most currently?
What categories of risks are most difficult to detect & protect against currently?
What category attacks are most risky (in terms of potential losses, like banking account info, credit card numbers, etc)?
What type of combination of protection/scanners categories would give a reasonable current & up-to-date protection for today's worst risks.
BTW, when asking I'm assuming the following:
1. User already has a brain, knows how to operate it (i.e. safe surfing)
2. User does NOT have time to keep up to date on 0-day exploits and patches
3. User does NOT have time to learn very complicated programs or esoteric software with Chinese only UI
4. Due to assumption (1), the user does not like to install and use underground security apps not tested or verified in public (i.e. avoid using enthusiast specialty software)
5. Single security suites (any suite from any publisher) does not provide a reasonable level of protection
6. Choking the machine with 3 x HIPS, 2 x sandbox, 3 x antivirus, 10 x manual scanners, 7 x anti-rootkits is too cumbersome, too time consuming, too risky of system level conflicts and as such, completely out of the question. The protection must be in balance with the risks, but provide higher level of actual security than a single suite.
I think this kind of an overview would be beneficial to many of us, who mostly have time to visit forums like this couple of times a month and only glance through a few topics.
Of course, this kind of overview would need to be up dated and include metareviews of all the applications as well, in order to be able to give practical recommendations.
But let's stick to 'software category' level for now, and forget about single named applications or sw manufacturers.
Risk & attack types
- viruses, worms
- trojans, rootkits
- malware, adware
- dialers
- bots, zombie controllers
- outgoing attacks, sw firewall removers
- password sniffers, password scanners, password hackers
AND
Protection & Security software
- Anti-virus software
- Anti-trojan & malware software
- Software firewalls (incl.
- HIPS
- Sandboxes
- etc.
I'm not looking for a complete list of application names, but more like categories of different risk/attack types vs. various protection/scanner software.
Also, what categories of risks are growing the most currently?
What categories of risks are most difficult to detect & protect against currently?
What category attacks are most risky (in terms of potential losses, like banking account info, credit card numbers, etc)?
What type of combination of protection/scanners categories would give a reasonable current & up-to-date protection for today's worst risks.
BTW, when asking I'm assuming the following:
1. User already has a brain, knows how to operate it (i.e. safe surfing)
2. User does NOT have time to keep up to date on 0-day exploits and patches
3. User does NOT have time to learn very complicated programs or esoteric software with Chinese only UI
4. Due to assumption (1), the user does not like to install and use underground security apps not tested or verified in public (i.e. avoid using enthusiast specialty software)
5. Single security suites (any suite from any publisher) does not provide a reasonable level of protection
6. Choking the machine with 3 x HIPS, 2 x sandbox, 3 x antivirus, 10 x manual scanners, 7 x anti-rootkits is too cumbersome, too time consuming, too risky of system level conflicts and as such, completely out of the question. The protection must be in balance with the risks, but provide higher level of actual security than a single suite.
I think this kind of an overview would be beneficial to many of us, who mostly have time to visit forums like this couple of times a month and only glance through a few topics.
Of course, this kind of overview would need to be up dated and include metareviews of all the applications as well, in order to be able to give practical recommendations.
But let's stick to 'software category' level for now, and forget about single named applications or sw manufacturers.