View Full Version : CryptoSuite OLD Benchmark Results
Jason_R0
December 1st, 2003, 04:04 AM
Download CryptoSuite here :- http://www.diamondcs.com.au/cryptosuite/index.php?page=download
You can run the CryptoSuite benchmark simply by loading up the CryptoSuite program (Demo or Full version) and clicking on the "Settings" tab.
From there all you need to do is click on Start benchmark and let it run. You should try and not move the mouse or do anything else while it is running to ensure it uses all of your computers speed.
Post your results here if you like, along with your CPU type and other system information. Remember that the only valid results occur when you close down all your other applications and don't move the mouse during the benchmark. So don't bother posting results while you are running a game in the background :)
CURRENT 3 HIGHEST CRYPTOMARK SCORES :-
----------------------------------------------------------
[34575 CryptoMarks] - Caliban - Achieved on a INTEL 3.4E / 1024MB DDR2 RAM
[34120 CryptoMarks] - TheQuest - Achieved on an Athlon Barton 3200+ overclocked to 2531MHz / 1024MB RAM
[32823 CryptoMarks] - chev_rules - Achieved on an AMD64 3200+ overclocked to 2180MHz / 1024MB RAM
----------------------------------------------------------
CURRENT LOWEST CRYPTOMARK SCORE :-
1113 CryptoMarks - Achieved on an INTEL P166MHz/40MB RAM
-Jason-
Jason_R0
December 1st, 2003, 04:06 AM
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 1096MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 511MB
Total time taken: 37433ms
Average time for each test: 5347ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 13357 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
This was on an Intel Celeron 1100mhz, 512MB ram.
-Jason-
Pilli
December 1st, 2003, 05:47 AM
Ok I'll play :) XP Pro AMD 2200
Detox
December 1st, 2003, 01:33 PM
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 1674MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 1023MB
Total time taken: 23044ms
Average time for each test: 3292ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 21697 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
That's not fair you beat me with half the ram ffs I'm pouting now...
Anyway that AMD 2000 of mine sure ain't doing 2000 ! hmph
FluxGFX
December 1st, 2003, 01:54 PM
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 2096MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 511MB
Total time taken: 31401ms
Average time for each test: 4671ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 27741 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
this doesnt look right.....
Pieter_Arntz
December 1st, 2003, 02:50 PM
My testbox:
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 1396MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 382MB
Total time taken: 50164ms
Average time for each test: 7166ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 9967 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Hey, who stole 2 MB ? ;)
P4 desktop 1400 MHz 384 MB RIMM memory
Paul Wilders
December 1st, 2003, 02:55 PM
{QUOTE-> Hey, who stole 2 MB ? <-QUOTE}
oops...I merely borrowed it
regards,
paul
Detox
December 1st, 2003, 02:59 PM
*scratch scratch*
Why is it that Flux has lower speed in the test than me but more cryptomarks?
I demand cryptomarks!
FanJ
December 1st, 2003, 03:03 PM
cryptomarks
Heya Detox, I've got you some cryptomarks (hey, don't tell Jason ;) ).
Pieter_Arntz
December 1st, 2003, 04:07 PM
Have some of mine. My notebook:
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 2799MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 509MB
Total time taken: 18202ms
Average time for each test: 2600ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 27469 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
And 3 more MB missing. Paul!! ;D
P4 2,8 GHz 512 MB DDR SDRAM
Douglas
December 1st, 2003, 04:31 PM
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 351MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 127MB
Total time taken: 116169ms
Average time for each test: 16595ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 4304 CRYPTOMARKS!
--------------------------
Have I won yet? ;D
hayc59
December 1st, 2003, 09:07 PM
what does it all mean?? ;D ;D
DolfTraanberg
December 1st, 2003, 09:15 PM
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 399MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 767MB
Total time taken: 129143ms
Average time for each test: 18449ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 3871 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
:'( suppose this one is not made for me
Jason_R0
December 1st, 2003, 09:25 PM
CryptoMarks is basically a score for your computer at cryptographic operations. It mainly stresses your CPU (integer) and MEMORY (RAM). Basically the higher CryptoMarks score you get, the faster CryptoSuite will encrypt/decrypt data, generate keys, etc. It is probably also a good indication of how other cryptographic applications will run also.
These tests aren't really "synthetic" they are composed of real algorithms, which is why a higher CryptoMarks score DIRECTLY relates to better performance in CryptoSuite. AMD cpu's will score higher than INTEL cpu's usually, even when the AMD is a few hundred MHZ slower, this is due to AMD's "more power per MHz". This isn't really a contest, it is just a way for us to see various performance levels across everyone's computers. So don't be ashamed if you get a low score, you are still helping us. :)
Also the RAM being reported slightly incorrectly is due to Windows... I will have to find a more accurate way of determining this in the next version. :) An AMD XP 2000+ only runs at 1667MHz, it is sold as a "2000+" because it means it usually beats an INTEL CPU running at that speed. I wouldn't worry though because as I said previously, AMD cpu's are faster than Intel CPU's at the same MHz.
-Jason-
hayc59
December 1st, 2003, 09:26 PM
so how did i score?? :)
windows98se pentium 3
Jason_R0
December 1st, 2003, 09:30 PM
hayc, a P3-933mhz/512MB ram we have here scored ~11500. So your system is about on par with that I would suggest. :)
I will post some more results from other CPU's we have later.
-Jason-
hayc59
December 1st, 2003, 09:38 PM
thank you!! ;D ;)
you have pm....
gkweb
December 1st, 2003, 10:19 PM
Jason said :
{QUOTE->
An AMD XP 2000+ only runs at 1800MHz
<-QUOTE}
it runs at 1667 Mhz ;)
rerun2
December 1st, 2003, 10:45 PM
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 1011MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 511MB
Total time taken: 38718ms
Average time for each test: 5531ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 12913 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Jason_R0
December 1st, 2003, 11:40 PM
gkweb, yep! You are correct. Thanks for pointing that out 8)
-Jason-
Detox
December 2nd, 2003, 12:21 AM
Compared my benchmark to others; it would appear that a little bit of extra processor speed gets you a lot more performance in this proggy than a lot of extra RAM.
Jason_R0
December 2nd, 2003, 12:27 AM
Yes because the CryptoSuite benchmark only uses at maximum 2MB of memory. It stresses your memory subsystems though, unless you had a very large L2/L3 cache. So it is good for CryptoSuite to have VERY fast memory/large CPU cache. :)
-Jason-
Joop
December 2nd, 2003, 12:46 PM
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 3065MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 1022MB
Total time taken: 17222ms
Average time for each test: 2460ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 29032 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Here's a Intel CPU installed
Pieter_Arntz
December 2nd, 2003, 02:31 PM
:o
Hi Joop,
Welcome at Wilders. :)
Is that a HyperThreading CPU?
Regards,
Pieter
Joop
December 2nd, 2003, 04:38 PM
Yes Pieter, last month I decided to change my system so came up with that CPU ( Intel P 4 HT, 3066 with Northwood HyperTreading ).
Works flawless on a Asus P4P800 pro board.
It's kind of a change from P3 800 towards this.
People from TDS know me from my avatar ;)
Jason, that program looks fine only can't find any use to it yet, but who
knows in time.
puff-m-d
December 2nd, 2003, 04:47 PM
System Specs in Sig.....
Regards,
Kent
Pilli
December 2nd, 2003, 04:56 PM
Looks like Joop will have to tweak his timings - Ouch! ;D
Some system puff-m-d :D
Joop
December 2nd, 2003, 05:03 PM
:o
Just have to get my hamer, torch and chisel....
but yes................ ouch :o
puff-m-d
December 2nd, 2003, 06:13 PM
Hey...
It was only 78 Cryptomarks!!!!
Only 46 ms total time difference!!!!
Regards,
Kent
gkweb
December 2nd, 2003, 06:29 PM
AMD AthlonXP 2000+
CPU Frequency: 1666MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 511MB
Total time taken: 22415ms
Average time for each test: 3202ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 22306 CRYPTOMARKS!
i have a better score than the other AthlonXP 2000+ of this thread
8)
rerun2
December 2nd, 2003, 07:26 PM
Are the scores affected by HT or having dual CPUs?
gkweb
December 2nd, 2003, 07:38 PM
i think it should.
Detox
December 2nd, 2003, 08:31 PM
{QUOTE-> quoting: gkweb link=board=41;threadid=17087;start=15#msg106223 date=1070407798]
i have a better score than the other AthlonXP 2000+ of this thread
8)
<-QUOTE}
Yeah you do, and with half my RAM :o
Now I'm mad ;D
ooooh wait I just remembered I had TS and ICQ running last time.. tried again and seems like that's most of the difference. My extra RAM just doesn't help in this app.
CPU Frequency: 1674MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 1023MB
Total time taken: 22414ms
Average time for each test: 3202ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 22307 CRYPTOMARKS!
Jason_R0
December 2nd, 2003, 09:15 PM
Having DUAL-CPU's and HT would help somewhat.. but not directly in CryptoSuite's benchmark. Most cryptographic algorithms aren't exactly designed to be split up amongst different threads. However, having another CPU also means that all the Windows threads and other process threads (when they are idle), which eat up roughly 2-10% of a single CPU won't affect your score like a single CPU. So I would say dual-cpu (and possibly HT) would have 2-10% better scores than single cpu people.
Anyhow, here is my home-system benchmark. My system is an Athlon-3200+ on a NFORCE2 motherboard with 512MB of PC3200 ram. I only had 2 programs running (besides all the normal services, etc) whilst doing this benchmark. It would be great to compare an Intel P4 3.2ghz (which with AMD's rating is equal to my CPU) to see how close they are.
-Jason-
Gavin - DiamondCS
December 3rd, 2003, 03:14 AM
{QUOTE-> quoting: puff-m-d link=board=41;threadid=17087;start=15#msg106218 date=1070406838]
Hey...
It was only 78 Cryptomarks!!!!
Only 46 ms total time difference!!!!
Regards,
Kent
<-QUOTE}
I would bet on memory quality ;)
Or maybe Joop moved his mouse ;D ;D
Pilli
December 3rd, 2003, 03:40 AM
Can't wait to see the first Opteron results 8)
Jooske
December 3rd, 2003, 07:20 AM
You guys are not going to believe this, but it is really possible!
A very old P166, winME on it, and ...... look for yourself i have CS running on it without any problem.
CPU Frequency: 167MHz (=/- 5mhz0
RAM Installed: 39MB
Total time taken: 448972ms
Average time for each test: 64138ms
----------------------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 1113 CRYPTOMARKS!
----------------------------------------------------------------
I admit is is an old test system only so only a few programs were running on it at the time, it's just that other people with less fancy systems then you toppers dare to post their less fancy scores too!
It's not the system i work on though.
And now you know it even runs without a problem on these specs. So add your family on the old PC-private projects systems and chat away!
snapdragin
December 3rd, 2003, 08:19 AM
With as much turned off as i could (except services and a few necessary programs, my cryptomarks were higher...yeaaaa lol
-----------------[Benchmark finished]----------------
CPU Frequency: 1595MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 511MB
Total time taken: 43087ms
Average time for each test: 6155ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 11604 CRYPTOMARKS!
But then with the programs that i normally have running, turned back on, i lost a few cyrptomarks there.
-----------------[Benchmark finished]---------------
CPU Frequency: 1595MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 511MB
Total time taken: 44035ms
Average time for each test: 6290ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 11354 CRYPTOMARKS!
That doesn't look too bad. i don't know. LOL
Jason_R0
December 3rd, 2003, 10:14 AM
Ok, I think I will keep the TOP most post in this thread to contain the highest and lowest scores so far. When someone posts a lower/higher score then I will update them. :)
Jooske, it is good to see see results from old machines like that. If I still had a 486 I would test that too. :)
-Jason-
Jooske
December 3rd, 2003, 01:51 PM
Ok ok, put an old 486 together with 24 mb RAM and win98se on it for you. Hope to be able to post the benchmark results before tomorrow as this is really too hard for this combination. :)
Suppose it will give -00X cryptomarks.
could open of course only one CS instance and thus i could not try the chat with myself, not other functions bigger then just a very small file encryption, nice to try out such a thing.
Jason_R0
December 3rd, 2003, 10:44 PM
On a 486-50MHz (DX2) /24MB RAM it crashed when trying to get the CPU Speed (I guess the 486 does not support the instruction I use :) ) but I managed to add up the scores and calculate it anyhow.
Total Time Taken: 1469510ms (1468 seconds)
Average Time For Each Test: 209930ms (209 seconds)
Your computer scored: 340 CRYPTOMARKS!
So I guess the benchmark will probably only work on Pentium+ machines. CryptoSuite however seems to work fine on a 486 with only 24MB of ram. A little slow but it still works. ;)
-Jason-
Jooske
December 4th, 2003, 02:48 AM
True, it comes through the benchmark tests, but crashes the program on the calculation for cryptomarks. Mine was a 66mhz SX if i remember well.
Did not test the encryption nor chat in action, i think you could make a coffee waiting for a reply with so little RAM.
SimonP
December 4th, 2003, 09:42 AM
Looks like I am the new record holder ;D
I have a cheap Celeron 2.6 ghz, a little bit overclocked.
/Simon
Jason_R0
December 4th, 2003, 10:36 AM
Wow congrats. What sort of cooling do you have on that? :)
So I guess a 3.2ghz does beat an AMD 3200+.. just :)
-Jason-
SimonP
December 4th, 2003, 11:55 AM
Thanks!
I have no special cooling, it's original.
Pilli
December 5th, 2003, 02:31 AM
IMHO The CM's should be catagorised. Such as
Laptop
Intel - Normal
Intel - Overclocked
AMD - Normal
AMD - Overclocked
Special - Other CPU's & or specialised rigs.
Slowest.
Bob_Anderson
December 5th, 2003, 03:48 PM
AMD 2100+ (1.733 Ghz), KT333 chipset, 512 MB 266 Mhz DDR RAM, XP Pro: 23,345
Toshiba Tecra notebook, Pentium M 1.4 Ghz Centrino, Intel Odem 855PM chipset, 512 MB 266 Mhz DDR RAM, XP Pro: 19,879
-Bob
Peter2150
December 5th, 2003, 11:12 PM
My system is a 3.0ghz with HT, and 1gig of high speed memory.
Jason this would be an interesting comparison with your machine. By itself, I don't think the HT makes much of a difference. I did watch it run, and the benchmark, basically ran almost entirely on one processor. (HT shows up as 2 processors.
1st test was just the benchmark, with nothing else.
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 3028MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 1023MB
Total time taken: 17013ms
Average time for each test: 2430ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 29389 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Then I open the DVD Player program, but didn't have it doing anything, and reran the benchmark.
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 3028MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 1023MB
Total time taken: 16832ms
Average time for each test: 2404ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 29705 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
These results were within the margin of error. If I ran it 5 times, I would get different results within this range.
3rd Test. Ran Benchmark with a move playing. This is the one I'd like Jason to try.
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 3028MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 1023MB
Total time taken: 19654ms
Average time for each test: 2807ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 25440 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Watching them run in the performance monitor, the movie was in one thread, and the benchmark in the other.
Jason, I'd love to know your benchmark, with a move running in your DVD, if you have one. This could test the value of Intel HT.
Pete
Jason_R0
December 5th, 2003, 11:36 PM
Well I havn't tested DVD playback on my main machine (the one which scored 30000). I have tested with other things happening in the background, compiling, webpages, etc. The lowest I have seen my machine get is ~25000 CryptoMarks. The CryptoSuite benchmark thread has a higher than normal priority, hence it will usually take all the CPU it can grab.
-Jason-
chev_rules
December 23rd, 2003, 02:06 PM
here is my benchmark scores for my Athlon 64bit running at 2.0Ghz with 1.0Gb of Mushkin high performance black level 2 ram
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 2002MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 1022MB
Total time taken: 16642ms
Average time for each test: 2377ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 30044 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Paul Wilders
December 23rd, 2003, 03:57 PM
Hi chev, and welcome ;)
That's quite a nice system you have - and a top score 8)
regards,
paul
Jason_R0
December 23rd, 2003, 09:52 PM
Hi Chev, welcome to the forum. I thought the Athlon64 would reign supreme even in this 32bit test and on a MHz:MHz comparison it sure does. Chev, if you are comforable, you may want to try overclocking just a little to get the number one spot :) . It is a nice score anyhow, I have updated the first post to reflect that this is the 3rd fastest.
-Jason-
chev_rules
December 23rd, 2003, 10:09 PM
{QUOTE-> quoting: Jason / DiamondCS link=board=41;threadid=17087;start=45#msg113172 date=1072234347]
Hi Chev, welcome to the forum. I thought the Athlon64 would reign supreme even in this 32bit test and on a MHz:MHz comparison it sure does. Chev, if you are comforable, you may want to try overclocking just a little to get the number one spot :) . It is a nice score anyhow, I have updated the first post to reflect that this is the 3rd fastest.
-Jason-
<-QUOTE}
no problem, i just done a slight OC since i just have stock cooling. Athlon 3200+ running @2.18Ghz
Jason_R0
December 23rd, 2003, 10:21 PM
Very nice! AMD regains the number one spot. The FX-51 which runs at almost that speed I guess would be even faster. Congrats on the #1 spot :) . I doubt anything will be knocking that off until a FX-51 comes along 8) .
-Jason-
Jooske
December 24th, 2003, 04:19 AM
Now that's a good occasion to upgrade to the full version today! Might keep the number 1 spot even tighter!
Congratulations and put it under the christmas tree!
Pilli
December 24th, 2003, 07:23 AM
Woo hoo! My next upgrade will be to an FX51 box - Not until later next year though :'(
siliconman01
December 24th, 2003, 03:28 PM
Dell Dimension 8200 with 800 chipset, 1.5 gbytes DRAM.
Increased my score from 12227 to 24953 by upgrading today from 1.8 ghz Pentium IV to 2.6 ghz Pentium IV. Not record setting but a BIG improvement! ;D
Jason_R0
December 25th, 2003, 11:03 AM
Yes over twice the speed should help in CryptoSuite a lot. :) Anything over 20000 will be extremely fast in CryptoSuite.
-Jason-
ArchAngel_8
January 7th, 2004, 12:09 PM
CPU 2.8 mhz
Ram - 509 MB
Time taken - 23916ms
Score - 20906 CRYPTOMARKS
I actually do not understand this benchmark...... Although there are many things I do not understand when it comes to computers ::).. LOL
It seems my Pentium 4 2.8ghz with 512MB of ram is always struggling with scans such as Adware 6., TDS-3, Norton AV, .... ???
Jason_R0
January 7th, 2004, 10:20 PM
That is a bit below average for your computer. Maybe you have a lot of background processes running?
Try closing down a few programs and running the benchmark again.
-Jason-
Red_Dwarf
February 13th, 2004, 09:06 PM
Bit late in the day to add here but here we go...
CPU Intel 3.06 533 Mhz HT *clocked by 10% ish*
1 gig Ram
HT enabled and windows XP themes enabled
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 3381MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 1022MB
Total time taken: 19412ms
Average time for each test: 2773ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 25757 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Just a silly side note when I disabled HT
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 3381MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 1022MB
Total time taken: 19242ms
Average time for each test: 2748ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 25984 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Then with HT disabled and XP themes turned off
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 3381MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 1022MB
Total time taken: 19199ms
Average time for each test: 2742ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 26043 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
And Yeah AMD chipset do seem to have the edge ;)
Red Dwarf
controler
February 14th, 2004, 01:18 AM
I dissagree
I dissagree
How are you getting these results when you are using a
CPU Intel 3.06 533 Mhz and your benchmark shows a 3381mhz cpu? There is no way to overclock an AMD that much dude.
I ahve been building system for many years and know better. LOL
Just kidding but an intel 3.06 should not be labled 533 mhz
con
Intel is better ;D
Intel is better ;D
Red_Dwarf
February 14th, 2004, 05:41 PM
Con :o
I am running an Intel 3.06.
Motherboard is an Asus PC4800
overclocking set to 10%
thus 3381 mhz
;D
Red Dwarf
Red_Dwarf
February 15th, 2004, 02:07 PM
I wonder how my latop would get on with this...
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 1698MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 767MB
Total time taken: 24459ms
Average time for each test: 3494ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 20442 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Laptop is a Dell Latitude D800 1.7 Centrino
Rod S
February 15th, 2004, 10:54 PM
Red Dwarf....probably not for posting here, but Red Dwarf is my favourite TV show :) Are you a fan Red_Dwarf?
Pilli
February 16th, 2004, 07:45 AM
{QUOTE-> Red Dwarf....probably not for posting here, but Red Dwarf is my favourite TV show Are you a fan Red_Dwarf? <-QUOTE}
Correct! But it does gives me the opportunity to give you the public server details ;D
Server IP: 81.105.28.14 Poert: 5096 PW: pc2
Red_Dwarf does cometimes use CS chat ;)
Jason_R0
February 16th, 2004, 10:22 PM
It really does seem weird that Intel P4's seem to be much worse at this benchmark than AMD chips. I thought the difference wouldn't be as great as it has been. The code has not been optimized for any particular CPU either.
A new PC we have here now, a P4-2.8GHz with HyperThreading, only scores 21500 CryptoMarks. It seems really odd, especially considering that a Celeron is second fastest thus far in this benchmark. My AMD chip which is currently 3rd (with 30198 Cryptomarks) was only running at 2.22GHz.
-Jason-
Jason_R0
February 17th, 2004, 12:04 AM
And here is the screenshot of the benchmark. Hopefully someone with a PRESCOTT Intel CPU can post some results. 8)
This screenshot is from a P4-2.8GHz with HYPERTHREADING enabled.
-Jason-
TheQuest
February 17th, 2004, 07:02 PM
Hi, All
Have you tried the two Version's back to back?
I think the difference is between Version's, v1.050 seem to give a lower score of between 3000 and 3500 lower benchmark than v1.000.
Of the test I have run. My highest 29885 [v1.000] 25700 ish. [v1.050]
If this is of any help
TheQuest ???
puff-m-d
February 17th, 2004, 09:37 PM
Just like to add that my benchmarks score lower with the newer version also.... Except mine scores 7000 to 8000 lower...
Regards,
Kent
Jason_R0
February 17th, 2004, 10:13 PM
Ok thanks for pointing this out. I will look into this to see if the new version is any different.
-Jason-
puff-m-d
February 17th, 2004, 10:26 PM
Jason,
As always, thanks for your help.... This is by no means a big problem, as I was just wondering why my score had changed so drastically....
Thanks again,
Kent
puff-m-d
February 17th, 2004, 10:33 PM
Below is a screen shot of the comparison....
Results on top are the previous version of CS
and the one on the bottom is from the current release....
HTH....
Regards,
Kent
Gavin - DiamondCS
February 18th, 2004, 03:53 AM
Maybe you had a lot of programs running :)
I only had firewall and PG running and hadn't connected to the net and got :
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 2405MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 511MB
Total time taken: 20837ms
Average time for each test: 2976ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 23995 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Asus P4PE, P4 2.4GHz (533) and 512MB RAM at 333MHz
northstar51
February 19th, 2004, 01:32 PM
Hello:
cpu freq: 1595mhz +/-5mhz
ram: 767mb
tot. time: 55888ms
avg time: 7984ms
score: 8946cryptomarks
these results seem a bit sluggish, but i took the benchmark test several times, similar results...ns51
puff-m-d
February 19th, 2004, 01:39 PM
{QUOTE-> quoting: Gavin / DiamondCS link=board=41;threadid=17087;start=60#msg132701 date=1077094384]
Maybe you had a lot of programs running :)
<-QUOTE}
I had the same identical programs running each time... The only difference was in the version of CS....
Regards,
Kent
TheQuest
February 19th, 2004, 03:58 PM
Hi, Gavin
Thanks for your replies. The reason I posted was because of.
{QUOTE-> <-QUOTE}It really does seem weird that Intel P4's seem to be much worse at this benchmark than AMD chips. I thought the difference wouldn't be as great as it has been. The code has not been optimized for any particular CPU either.
A new PC we have here now, a P4-2.8GHz with HyperThreading, only scores 21500 CryptoMarks. It seems really odd, especially considering that a Celeron is second fastest thus far in this benchmark. My AMD chip which is currently 3rd (with 30198 Cryptomarks) was only running at 2.22GHz.
=================================================================================
I only had crypto running. I had turned DCS [WG\TDS\PE\PG] Also NOD32and ZAP all off.
Only difference was v1.00 and v1.50.
Please could you tell me how I post a picture in to a post like you do, also if you could will you tell me how to make my sig colored. So it will be there for future reference.
Thanks again in Advance.
TheQuest ???
Pilli
February 19th, 2004, 06:02 PM
Hi Quest, I can with this: :)
{QUOTE-> Please could you tell me how I post a picture in to a post like you do, also if you could will you tell me how to make my sig colored. So it will be there for future reference <-QUOTE}
Highlight any text in CS with the left mouse button presed and it is automatically placed on the clipboard you can then paste it into whatever window will take it such as this.
This is with the PC doing loads of stuff at the moment. AMD 2200+
-----------Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 1807MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 511MB
Total time taken: 23938ms
Average time for each test: 3419ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 20887 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Peter2150
February 19th, 2004, 08:26 PM
Glad to see I am not the only one. I also notice the benchmark dropped by about 3000. Not that it matters, but interesting.
TheQuest
February 19th, 2004, 08:40 PM
Hi, Pilli
Thanks for your response,
I will give it a go now.
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 2194MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 1023MB
Total time taken: 16709ms
Average time for each test: 2387ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 29923 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Well that bit worked, Thanks very much. :)
I Hope some one will tell me how to put a picture in here like other people do? :(
And also so how to make my Signature colored? :(
Thanks again.
TheQuest 8)
Pilli
February 20th, 2004, 01:35 AM
{QUOTE-> I Hope some one will tell me how to put a picture in here like other people do? <-QUOTE}
Click the browse button below & navigate to where the picture is stored on your PC, click open then preview below, BTW your picture has to be smaller than 800 x 600 I think, will then be uploaded to the board. If ypu are happy with your post then click post. Many ppl use Irfanview to capture their screenies: http://www.irfanview.com/
{QUOTE-> And also so how to make my Signature colored? <-QUOTE}
You can use the Yabb codes shown in the board help such as this:
[ color=Purple ] colour check [ /color ]
Jason_R0
February 20th, 2004, 02:13 AM
Hi TheQuest,
I see we have very similar systems, my main system I use at home is an Athlon 2600+/Abit Nforce2 v2.0 motherboard with one gig of ram. I have only been able to clock my memory to 333mhz (PC2700) when I have one gig of memory installed, so I am a bit disappointed at that.
In regards to posting pictures, whenever you press the PRINT SCREEN button on your keyboard, Windows saves the entire screen to the CLIPBOARD as an IMAGE in memory. To get this image from memory onto disk you need a "paint" program, either MSPAINT or something like Paint Sho Pro (www.jasc.com). Once you have loaded the paint program simply go to the EDIT menu and click PASTE, the image should now appear. Then you can save it into whatever format the paint program supports. GIF and JPEG are the best image formats to use on on the internet, MSPAINT doesn't support these, but Paint Shop Pro does.
-Jason-
TheQuest
February 20th, 2004, 06:58 PM
Hi, Jason
Thanks for your reply.
I am glad I had go read round when I was looking to do a new build.
Abit are the one's to get I think. the NF7-S v2 being about the best and when it has AMD and OCZ put with it. It will rule. [Well soon with a bit more of a tweak]
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 2392MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 1023MB
Total time taken: 15374ms
Average time for each test: 2196ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 32522 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
I all ready have them as jpeg 62kb. But can not get them to post in this postbox.
Can you tell me how you get your one's to past in to your post box.
Thank again
TheQuest 8)
TheQuest
February 20th, 2004, 10:31 PM
Hi
Just trying again to a jpeg get here.
TheQuest ??? Well at last all's well !!! ;D
TheQuest
February 20th, 2004, 10:50 PM
Hi,
Now I know how, Will this do for now?
Thanks again
TheQuest :o
Jason_R0
February 20th, 2004, 11:10 PM
Well you have certainly pushed my system out of the top 3 8).
You are now the #1 leader, congratulations. :)
-Jason-
Pilli
February 21st, 2004, 04:24 AM
High TheQuest
I found this free Screen capture utility yesterday: http://www.gadwin.com/download/
Here is a screanie showing my CS chat client over yours & Jason's post:
PS. The Chat server Password is pc2 ;)
Gavin - DiamondCS
February 22nd, 2004, 10:07 AM
Ok so its a little overclocked now :) This is why people tweak and overclock their machines ;) big difference. Closed ALL programs even a bunch of services too which got me another few hundred. Oh and run the test 3 times in a row.. I just passed 30000 for the first time for me ! yay ;D It peaks there and returns the same results a few times in a row.
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 3006MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 511MB
Total time taken: 16654ms
Average time for each test: 2379ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 30022 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
PS.. could get higher :) I think I might be a bit far off the record to try though.. ??? ahh its only 3000 ! :)
wink
February 22nd, 2004, 01:11 PM
Well I am totally confused now.
I downloaded the demo version of cryptosuite and ran the benchmark. I wasn't expecting anything remarkable in the way of results, ... but also I wasn't expecting such a poor result either. Unfortunately I have uninstalled the demo now as the lowness of the benchmark was makin me dislike my pc. If you are wondering how low it actually was > 16500ish.
I shutdown all open apps and stopped a couple of processes, admittidly I still had a numebr of processes running.
I have a p4 3.00GHz running at 800fsb on a 200fsb mobo with dual channel ddr400 rams. see below for other info.
Operating system information
Platform:***Windows 2000
Version:***5.0.2195 Service Pack 4
Version of common control components:***5.81.4916
RAM:***1024 MB
Processor:***Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz (3014 MHz)
how can this be SO poor! It's attrocious!
surely having a few background processes active wouldn't knock the benchmark so low, as Jason said earlier in the thread that HT should handle the benchmark and such processes separately... who knows ... does anyone have any ideas?
oh well might as well get out my old p1 233mhz lappy
wink
Jason_R0
February 22nd, 2004, 08:06 PM
I have confirmed an actual drop going from version 1.000 to version 1.050. So don't put too much value in these v1.050 benchmarks yet. This will be fixed in the latest version.
-Jason-
TheQuest
February 22nd, 2004, 10:59 PM
Hi, Pilli
Thanks very much for your reply, also for the link.
Well I am sick :(, I have just purchased a Screen Capture Program and it is not very good. [The splash screen starts every time along with the help file when you start the Program, no options to turn them off very annoying >:(]. Ace WinSsreen Cost $29 what a waste of money.
Wish I had waited for you to post :-[.[Not Clairvoyant thru ::)] Small very easy to use Program, and Free.
Thanks VERY much, Wish I could give you a Cookie. [Well a cake really ;D]
PS. Jason, Does this not score then ???.
PPS. Pilli, The link in the forum help for Yabb Codes do not works. [Edit]Sorry was not looking deep enough.
TheQuest. 8)
Jason_R0
February 22nd, 2004, 11:59 PM
That is a very good score, but I won't be adding any new scores to the "TOP" list just yet, not until this benchmark version info is sorted out. If you got that high on version 1.050 though I can only imagine what you would get in v1.000 8)
-Jason-
Pilli
February 23rd, 2004, 04:56 AM
Hi TheQuest, I do a search for new free utils such a screen capture when a post like yours prompts me :D
Gadwin is nice simple programme and a fine, useful tool to use a long with Irfanview.
Wow! Nice score! 8)
nadirah
February 28th, 2004, 03:36 PM
CPU frequency: 2600MHz (+/- 5 MHz )
RAM installed: 246 MB
Total time taken: 25499ms
Average time for each test: 3642ms.
Your computer scored: 19608 CRYPTOMARKS!
Jason_R0
March 3rd, 2004, 08:48 PM
Ok I have found and fixed the problem with v1.050 benchmarks being slower than v1.000. The reason is due to some performance compiler settings I forgot to include when I switched parts of the code base, the next version due out soon will have this issue fixed!
-Jason-
puff-m-d
March 3rd, 2004, 09:03 PM
Thanks Jason!!!!!
A karma cookie for you!!!
Regards,
Kent
worldcitizen
March 7th, 2004, 10:26 AM
My scores dropped from 25750 to around 19700 on a P4 2.6 with HT so I'm glad to know it was the prog and not my PC.
Dave
Jason_R0
March 7th, 2004, 10:24 PM
Yes it is amazing how much compiler "optimization" can affect performance. :)
-Jason-
Nimbo
March 26th, 2004, 02:18 AM
Here is mine from version 1.050 ;D
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 2104MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 1023MB
Total time taken: 20380ms
Average time for each test: 2911ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 24533 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Jason_R0
March 29th, 2004, 11:06 PM
Time for everyone who ran the v1.050 benchmark to try v1.070 one. Repost those scores! :)
-Jason-
Pilli
March 30th, 2004, 08:55 AM
Here goes: Note all normal utils & progs running
PC1:
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 1807MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 511MB
Total time taken: 20854ms
Average time for each test: 2979ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 23976 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
PC2 (Server)
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 1209MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 255MB
Total time taken: 32113ms
Average time for each test: 4587ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 15570 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Laptop AMD1900 Mobile
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 1592MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 479MB
Total time taken: 23988ms
Average time for each test: 3426ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 20843 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
TheQuest
March 30th, 2004, 06:38 PM
Hi,
Rev it UpAbit. [Getting hot here]
Still missing 1mg of memory[hehehe :)]
TheQuest 8)
Jason_R0
March 30th, 2004, 10:41 PM
TheQuest, how many volts do you have going to your CPU to reach that speed? :)
-Jason-
TheQuest
March 30th, 2004, 11:17 PM
Hi, Jason
{QUOTE-> how many volts do you have going to your CPU to reach that speed? <-QUOTE}
Top Secret not telling you [ha!hehahe ;D]
1.8v and 2.8v. :-XPlease promise not pass this information to any body else :-X [hehehehehe :'(]
Will try to see how for I can go before I fry something, But I think I could get 34000 Crypto's. But no rush to go there.
The Real Secret is you all ready know, It in the [A]
Do not PUSH it, but do what your Mark Webber does REV IT.
Best of luck.
TheQuest 8)
TheQuest
March 31st, 2004, 01:27 AM
Hi, Jason
{QUOTE-> I see we have very similar systems, my main system I use at home is an Athlon 2600+/Abit Nforce2 v2.0 motherboard with one gig of ram. I have only been able to clock my memory to 333mhz (PC2700) when I have one gig of memory installed, so I am a bit disappointed at that. <-QUOTE}
Are you running Dual Chanel or Single, sometimes it might help to run single or to tried with just one stick.
Also have you been to:- http://forum.abit-usa.com/
I Use to own a Ford Cossy 450bhp [Cost a fortune to build the Engine, Etc] Now I am disabled I only Drive abit [Abit:- heheheh ;D]
This is one for Mark[Aus] But of coarse Jason Button come. [ I have banned Shuie from my computer ;)]
TheQuest 8)
PS. Bios D23
Jason_R0
March 31st, 2004, 01:36 AM
{QUOTE-> quoting: TheQuest link=board=41;threadid=17087;start=90#msg152864 date=1080714466]
Hi, Jason
Are you running Dual Chanel or Single, sometimes it might help to run single or to trie with just one stick.
Also have you been to:- http://forum.abit-usa.com/
<-QUOTE}
I managed to find a way to get the gig of ram to PC3200 speeds in dual channel mode, I just have to make sure the timings are a bit relaxed, not super optimized. Both of my ram chips are slightly different you see, they aren't the same brand.
I have been to that Abit forum once or twice, seems interesting. :)
-Jason-
TheQuest
March 31st, 2004, 01:54 AM
Hi, Jason
Your the same as me I run mine Dual, but they are hand picked match pair [that what OCZ says anyway] Will try single channel when I tried this at near melt down.
Difference brands AND difference chips will both hold you back.
Best of luck.
TheQuest
rodsoto
March 31st, 2004, 02:55 AM
First post for benchmark on CS 1.070... (i had a silly AMD K6-2 450 before)
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 2009MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 511MB
Total time taken: 18938ms
Average time for each test: 2705ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 26401 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Is that a good score for a 2000mhz pc?
Jason_R0
March 31st, 2004, 03:13 AM
By the score I can tell thats an Athlon XP you have there. :)
An Intel 2Ghz machine would be much lower.
It seems to be around the mark your score Rod, did you post your 450mhz benchmark? If not I would love to see it. :)
-Jason-
rodsoto
March 31st, 2004, 03:24 AM
Yes its an XP athlon, so i didn't get a dud processor then.....I checked the advert...'Get an XP Athlon 2400'. When CS said 2000ghz, i nearly died..
Shame, I don't have the K6-2 450 anymore jason, sorry.
TheQuest
March 31st, 2004, 03:31 AM
Hi, Jason
As I mentioned I am using Bios nf7_d23 and also I have the latest SiliconImage Sata Raid 1.0.047. Also FlashMenu 1.33.
Just some info on Bios D23 [Which was up then withdrawn] if you use it and also use AbitEQ, it will knock out EQ, seem there is a bug in it but no other side effect on my Rig.
Hope this is of some help.
TheQuest 8)
Edit:- D23 back up at Abit.tw I am going download it now and re-flash with the new one [If understand what I mean] the one they have put back up.
Wish me luck as you know how funny the Bois can be[hehe ::)]
TheQuest 8)
Jason_R0
March 31st, 2004, 04:22 AM
Rod, AMD don't rate their XP processors with MHz, rather with their own rating (which people compare to a PENTIUM4 of the same speed).
For instance an XP 2400+ is comparible to a P4-2400Mhz. An XP 2400+ only runs at 2000MHz , however AMD chips have a higher IPC (instructions per clock) which means they can do more work per MHz than an Intel CPU, hence the rating.
Of course in some things (like pure Integer and Floating point not optimized for SSE2) the Athlon chips are a lot better than Intel clock for clock, the same way that Intel chips beat the Athlons by a bit more in certain things like memory bandwidth. So the rating is an overal rating.
Your XP 2400+ for instance is very close to the Pentium 4 2.8GHz with HyperThreading I use for developing, within 500 cryptomarks. Even though the Intel CPU I use has 800MHz more power.
TheQuest, I have heard some bad things about a few of those BIOS updates so I havn't been that willing to try any new ones yet. :)
-Jason-
TheQuest
March 31st, 2004, 05:52 AM
Hi, Jason
{QUOTE-> I have heard some bad things about a few of those BIOS updates so I havn't been that willing to try <-QUOTE}
Yes I have heard the same, but I think most but NOT all is user error, I have flashed this Board 9 times with no trouble so far. But any flash can go wrong.
As the saying go's nothing venture nothing gained or something like that.
Just re-flashed with the nf7d23 no trouble, EQ still not working though.
That Formula One ;D
TheQuest 8)
rodsoto
March 31st, 2004, 06:12 AM
Ahh thats alright then, so the MHZ rating doesn't matter with the athlons, im glad CS told me that other than finding out elsewhere hehe
TheQuest
March 31st, 2004, 07:13 AM
Hi, Rod Soto
Is this humor I hear here.
{QUOTE-> so the MHZ rating doesn't matter with the athlons <-QUOTE}
The higher you push your clock the higher the Marks, But you might get BSOD or random reboot, or reboot with Blank Screen and you have to reset the Bios [CMOS] If you OC to much[Heart Stopper]Haaaaaa :-[ :o] then take the battery out for ten minutes and then reset] then you[hehehehe ;D]
They are MHZ's
TheQuest 8)
TheQuest
March 31st, 2004, 08:52 AM
Hi, Rod Soto
Just Playing with some MHz's [Ist] without:- OC
TheQuest 8)
TheQuest
March 31st, 2004, 08:56 AM
Hi, Rod Soto
Just Playing with some MHz's [2nd] with a little more MHz[hehe ::)]:- OC
TheQuest 8)
rodsoto
March 31st, 2004, 11:56 PM
Thats interesting, I've never been an overclocking person, but since this PC was purchased for me, it was done so under the condition I don't leave it open or do any overclocking....I accidently killed my last PC when it fried due to the 5cm thick dust built up over the motherboard......woops hehe
Jason_R0
April 1st, 2004, 01:05 AM
TheQuest,
I managed to run the CryptoSuite test at 2400MHz, the score was 32486, I'll try later to beat your score and post the results I achieved. :)
Your 3200+ Barton would have an extra 256KB of cache, so I wonder how much of an effect that would have for this benchmark.
-Jason-
TheQuest
April 1st, 2004, 01:48 AM
Hi, Jason
Was it rocking hot, what HSC do you have and is the case open or shut and what is your PSU.
I have TL volcano9 80cm silent plus 4x80cm case fans, PSU has 2x80cm
Closed case.
Good luck with your score.
TheQuest 8)
Jason_R0
April 1st, 2004, 02:05 AM
Hi TheQuest,
Heatsink - SLK800 (half a kilogram of pure copper)
Fan - Volcano 9 variable speed 80MM fan (I think, can't remember exactly which heatsink I pulled it from) running at 5000RPM
Temps were 40C for the CPU and 30C for the system at that speed, at about 25C ambient temperature. PSU is just a 300Watt silent "JustCooler".
-Jason-
TheQuest
April 1st, 2004, 02:39 AM
Hi, Jason
Yes I forgot for a moment, where you live, [Australia=Hot]. But you are probably in an air condition office or house to help with your Temps.
See you have the same fan as me V9.
{QUOTE-> (half a kilogram of pure copper)
<-QUOTE}
Should use Australian Gold better then copper ;D ;D
I don't think your PSU will keep the volts up though.
Good Temps so for though.
TheQuest 8)
I mixed cm up with mm :-[
Jason_R0
April 1st, 2004, 03:09 AM
The voltages are dead steady, which really surprised me too. It must be a pretty decent power supply.
-Jason-
Dardasaba
April 3rd, 2004, 12:57 AM
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 2393MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 1023MB
Total time taken: 21691ms
Average time for each test: 3098ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 23051 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Windows XP SP2, 240 GB total hdd space, atleast 20% free in each drive, 1024 MB RAM (3 modules of 256,256 and 512) P4 2.4 GHZ (Not overclocked)
Damn, that's low for my config I think >8(
I'll defrag and try again. I wonder what kind of difference we'll see.
The benchmark test after the defrag:
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 2393MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 1023MB
Total time taken: 21110ms
Average time for each test: 3015ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 23685 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
It still seems a little low.. correct me if I'm wrong.
Jason_R0
April 4th, 2004, 11:19 AM
That score seems about right for your computer Dardasaba. :)
It seems AMD/Athlon CPU's really excell in this benchmark and Intel CPU's score a little lower than the same rated speed Athlon.
Anything over 20,000 is a very good score.
-Jason-
Tassie_Devils
April 6th, 2004, 11:56 PM
Jason.. seems like I just made it then. ;D
AMD AthlonXP2100 [1.73Mhz actual]
RAM 1023Mb
Score 20,563
Nimbo
April 12th, 2004, 04:17 PM
Well here is the results from my new PC I just got at work. P4 3Ghz HT with 1GB RAM ;D
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 2992MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 1014MB
Total time taken: 17017ms
Average time for each test: 2431ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 29382 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Fraha
April 18th, 2004, 09:50 AM
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 2000MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 511MB
Total time taken: 19350ms
Average time for each test: 2764ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 25839 CRYPTOMARKS!
This is a AMD Athlon 2400+ on 2.00 Ghz. and 512 MB RAM
Regards
Frans
Tassie_Devils
April 19th, 2004, 05:34 AM
hmmm.. interesting.. did another one and it changed for the better:
:)
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 1733MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 1023MB
Total time taken: 21766ms
Average time for each test: 3109ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 22971 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
AMD Athlon XP 2.1 [1.733 actual] with 1G RAM.
I did do some summer/spring/autumn cleaning LOL..
TAS
Pilli
April 22nd, 2004, 02:28 AM
For Jason's information :) These benchmarks were taken with the all usual apps running. AMD 2200XP running at 1800Mhz all other peripherals are the same except for the GFX card, MB and memory.
First Benchmark was with a Gigabyte MB and 512MB of DDR2100
Second is with Asus Av600-x using 512MB of TwinMOS DDR3200
1,-----------Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 1807MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 511MB
Total time taken: 23938ms
Average time for each test: 3419ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 20887 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
2.--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 1800MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 511MB
Total time taken: 20788ms
Average time for each test: 2969ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 24052 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Quite a good increase of around 15% ! ;D - Pilli
Jason_R0
April 22nd, 2004, 04:39 AM
Wow nice increase Pilli.
I wouldn't of though RAM would make that much difference, I take it you are running it in DUAL mode on your new motherboard?
-Jason-
Pilli
April 22nd, 2004, 05:41 AM
Hi Jason, No it is a via chipset not Nvidia and not overclocked but I have updated the BIOS.
The RAM has been "qualified" by Asus to run with the MB
256mb TwinMos M2G9I08AFTT9F0811DDT TwinMos SS TMD7608F8E50B
The motherboard is relatively inexpensive: The RAM was not!
http://uk.asus.com/products/mb/socketa/a7v600/overview.htm
A very pleasing result for sure, shame the Gigabyte "blew its caps" though :o as it was less than two years old.
dog
April 26th, 2004, 11:57 PM
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 2386MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 511MB
Total time taken: 22049ms
Average time for each test: 3149ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 22676 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
2.4 P4 - 512 Rambus
Dog - *puppy*
Ps. I picked another loser ... first I picked Beta over VHS ... and then RDRAM over DDR ... lol ...
Shelb
April 28th, 2004, 01:57 PM
Hi,
Haven't seen a lot of laptop benchmarks on here, so I thought I would post a score from my new laptop.
1.6 MHz Pentium M
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 1595MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 2047MB
Total time taken: 22192ms
Average time for each test: 3170ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 22530 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Pilli
April 28th, 2004, 02:37 PM
Nice Benchmark Shelb, Beat my 20843 ;D
Q Section
April 30th, 2004, 11:53 PM
{QUOTE-> Ps. I picked another loser ... first I picked Beta over VHS ... <-QUOTE}Beta is superior to VHS. Can one find a VHS Digicam used in broadcasting? No. On the other hand there are perhaps many thousands of Digital Betacams used daily in ENG & EFP which is for News gathering and field production. :)
Q Section
May 1st, 2004, 12:27 AM
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 451MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 319MB
Total time taked: 94742ms
Average time for eack test: 13534ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 5277 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
PII-450 98SE
P.S. Definitely NOT our main computer. :)
Shelb
May 2nd, 2004, 01:42 AM
Decided to boot up an old pc to run the benchmark on......almost a low score :P Maybe if I go back and reinstall the original 32 Mg RAM...... :)
Pentium 166 MHz MMX
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 166MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 127MB
Total time taken: 363453ms
Average time for each test: 51921ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 1375 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Pilli
May 2nd, 2004, 02:56 AM
Hi Shelb, Is your hobby watching paint dry? ;D
Shelb
May 2nd, 2004, 12:54 PM
{QUOTE-> Hi Shelb, Is your hobby watching paint dry? ;D <-QUOTE}
Well, the cows did come home before that benchmark finished!
Jason_R0
May 2nd, 2004, 11:05 PM
Nice scores guys! I am glad I only have to wait a bit under 20 seconds for it to complete on my machine, as having to wait 6 minutes would be frustrating. :)
-Jason-
Tony H
May 18th, 2004, 05:04 AM
>I only have to wait a bit under 20 seconds for it to complete on my machine,<
Soooooo slow Jason (he he) ;)
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 3082MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 1535MB
Total time taken: 16849ms
Average time for each test: 2407ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 29675 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Now if I could just run it on my Mac G5.............
T.
Pilli
May 21st, 2004, 06:47 AM
NEw CPU - AMD2600 (Barton) With DDR3200
Not sure if it is overclocked! :) But it is with KAV, TDS3, PG, SG, Kerio, B9 AdWatch and Avant/IE all running.
CPU Frequency: 2300MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 511MB
Total time taken: 16578ms
Average time for each test: 2368ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 30160 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
bibbe
May 21st, 2004, 07:40 AM
And here is mine on a AMD 3000+
--[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 2000MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 511MB
Total time taken: 16594ms
Average time for each test: 2370ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 30131 CRYPTOMARKS!
bibbe
Jason_R0
May 24th, 2004, 11:20 PM
{QUOTE-> NEw CPU - AMD2600 (Barton) With DDR3200
Not sure if it is overclocked! :) But it is with KAV, TDS3, PG, SG, Kerio, B9 AdWatch and Avant/IE all running.
CPU Frequency: 2300MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 511MB
Total time taken: 16578ms
Average time for each test: 2368ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 30160 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------ <-QUOTE}
Pilli that certainly is overclocked. Quite a nice one if it is stable, good score. :)
-Jason-
Jason_R0
May 24th, 2004, 11:21 PM
{QUOTE-> And here is mine on a AMD 3000+
--[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 2000MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 511MB
Total time taken: 16594ms
Average time for each test: 2370ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 30131 CRYPTOMARKS!
bibbe <-QUOTE}
This is an AMD64 3000+ cpu. It is nice to see it has more power per clock than even the original Athlon XP. Looks like 30000 is the new 20000. :)
TheQuest
May 25th, 2004, 12:33 AM
Hi, all
Not been here for a wile.
Good Going, Pilli and bibbe.
I see people are going to catch me soon.::) but not surpass;D ;D ;D
Take Care All,
TheQuest 8)
Pilli
May 25th, 2004, 04:34 AM
Jason, I was joking it was "mildly" overclocked :P And not stable :o, now quite happy at 2000Mhz - Which is about the equivelent of an XP2800, very stable with a CPU temp of 39C on normal running 46C intensive.
Jason_R0
May 25th, 2004, 10:49 PM
Ahk Pilli, didn't realize you were joking. :)
You should be able to get it stable at 2300MHz if you increase the voltage to the CPU, 1.75 volts would probably be enough without causing any damage to the CPU. If you are using the stock cooling device on your athlon though you might want to reconsider that. :)
I managed to run the CryptoSuite (http://www.diamondcs.com.au/cryptosuite) benchmark at 2400MHz on my Athlon 2600+ (non barton), at around 1.8-1.85 volts, but it wasn't very stable. :)
Pilli
May 26th, 2004, 05:47 AM
Thanks Jason, I am not normally an overclocker but wanted to see how the TwinMos 3200's stood up and if I could get past the 30,000 + CryptoMarks :)
As you say, increasing the CPU voltage would probably have stabalised it.
I'm quite happy with the performance at 2Ghz and a low CPU temp with my case fans turned right down. ;D
Lian Li case + Enermax twin fanned PSU
Jason_R0
May 31st, 2004, 03:29 AM
Pilli, you should of gone the next step up and bought some PC3500/3700 RAM. Pretty much all Athlons can run at that bus speed, and you don't necessarily have to overclock the CPU either, you can still get the gains in memory bandwidth.
As soon as you start to get serious with overclocking though you realize you start to need more advanced cooling, etc, which makes a fat wallet a thin one pretty quickly. :)
I'd like to see some very overclocked Athlon scores in here soon. :)
Dazed_and_Confused
June 29th, 2004, 10:38 PM
Here is mine:
--------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
CPU Frequency: 2393MHz (+/- 5mhz)
RAM Installed: 510MB
Total time taken: 23623ms
Average time for each test: 3374ms
------------------------------------------------
Your computer scored: 21165 CRYPTOMARKS!
------------------------------------------------
Caliban
August 7th, 2004, 12:16 AM
Dell 8400 P4 3.4gE 1g DDR2
Pilli
August 7th, 2004, 04:58 AM
Hi Caliban, Wow! Good score, is that the latest Pentium with the larger internal cache?
Caliban
August 7th, 2004, 05:41 AM
Yes, the Prescott. :D
Jason_R0
August 8th, 2004, 11:00 PM
Nice score Caliban, highest I have seen yet. I updated the top scores from the first post to include yours as number 1. You bumped off simonp's overclocked Celeron score. :)
Caliban
August 9th, 2004, 03:21 AM
Thank you Jason, I am pleased with the new box and eagerly await the next CryptoSuite version. :)
TheQuest
August 10th, 2004, 11:31 PM
Hi, Caliban
Yes a very good score.
I have tried for 2 hours to beat it, hands up I can not get to it at the moment.
To unstable to keep pushing.
Once again Congratulations.
Take Care,
TheQuest 8)
PS: Best I can come up with is this:-
Jason_R0
August 10th, 2004, 11:56 PM
{QUOTE-> Hi, Caliban
Yes a very good score.
I have tried for 2 hours to beat it, hands up I can not get to it at the moment.
To unstable to keep pushing.
Once again Congratulations.
Take Care,
TheQuest 8)
PS: Best I can come up with is this:- <-QUOTE}
Nice overclock for the Athlon XP TheQuest, I have updated your score with this new one. :)
I will be releasing a small public BETA release of a newer CryptoSuite benchmark program that I hope everyone in here can use and submit the results to our site (it will be automated most likely). It's ETA will most likely be in a few days.
TheQuest
August 11th, 2004, 12:28 AM
Hi, Jason_DiamondCS
Thanks Jason, will have another try when it cools down, it is hot very humid here in the UK at the moment. [hot for the UK this not like were you are :)]
That is not an excuse for not beating that massive score of Caliban's, I do not know if my system will be able to get to it :o, let alone pass it :-\.
Looking forward to the Update.
Take Care,
TheQuest 8)
Infinity
November 3rd, 2004, 03:52 PM
Hi my first benchtest with my new pc, haven't dared to overclock yet:
DougRees
December 7th, 2004, 11:01 PM
http://www.designbydoug.com/images/CS-Benchmark.gif
I guess I should overclock a little bit to keep up with you guys.
System: AMD Athlon 64 3500+ @ 2.2 gHz, MSI MS-7025 board, 1024 megs RAM
Jason_R0
December 8th, 2004, 12:20 AM
{QUOTE-> http://www.designbydoug.com/images/CS-Benchmark.gif
I guess I should overclock a little bit to keep up with you guys.
System: AMD Athlon 64 3500+ @ 2.2 gHz, MSI MS-7025 board, 1024 megs RAM <-QUOTE}
Nice score Doug, is your system already overclocked a little? I thought the 3500+ was 2.2GHz but the screenshot shows 2266MHz?
NOD32 user
January 25th, 2005, 03:19 PM
A p4 2.8 northwood with a mild 10% overclock for the entire system. Haven't experimented with higher voltages yet though. My board only supports DDR but it runs perfectly at the higher speeds. DDR400 @ 440 and 800FSB @ 880 !! No heat problems even at full load for extended peroids. ;)
I'll try the new benchmark now....
vBulletin® Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2009, Wilders Security Forums