View Full Version : Sana PRSC vs Cyberhawk vs Defense wall
candysketch
March 10th, 2007, 05:47 AM
Which one to choose:
1. The least resource hog.
2. Easiest to use.
3. Performance.
Please advise only one to choose and why. To use with system:
Window XP PRO SP2, Firefox, Avira Antivir PE, BoClean, Comodo Pro.
Many thanks
KikiBibi
March 10th, 2007, 05:51 AM
I choose DefenseWall.
I use IE7 with it. No more firefox/opera. No need to go through so much trouble.
Very easy to use. Light on resource.
Just place your browser/email/etc as untrusted and you are ready to go.
Bio-Hazard
March 10th, 2007, 05:58 AM
I would also use DefenseWall. Like KikiBibi said it is very easy to use and it is light on your resources. It also had good review on www.techsupportalert.com
Kees1958
March 10th, 2007, 06:19 AM
I would choose DefenseWall, because it is a treathgate application
- FireWall = Comodo
- Treathgate = DefenseWall (this Sandbox HIPS covers the entry points to your PC, mail, Internet, P2P, chat)
- Process level = BOCLean (generic Level process - would overlap with CyberHawk and PRSC)
- Antivirus (data level) = Antivir
vBulletin® Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2012, Wilders Security Forums