View Full Version : NOD sig updates more frequent lately?
Seer
March 8th, 2007, 12:29 PM
I am a long time NOD user. For months, daily signature updates were coming to my machine once a day, usually in the late afternoon hours, CET time. But lately I noticed that these updates are more frequent, twice or three times and sometimes four times a day. So I've been wondering is there something "fishy" (;D ) going on with our friends malwares these days? Or perhaps that has something to do with the long-time expected upcoming v3 (engine updates)? Not worried, just curious. :)
Cheers. :thumb:
ASpace
March 8th, 2007, 12:33 PM
An update is provided when necessary.There is nothing "phishy".NOD32 doesn't detect , it is added.The more malware (more active virus writers are) ,the more definitions we receive ;)
Bubba
March 8th, 2007, 12:43 PM
-{ Quote: "For months, daily signature updates were coming to my machine once a day, usually in the late afternoon hours, CET time. But lately I noticed that these updates are more frequent, twice or three times and sometimes four times a day" }-Perhaps your settings in regards to scheduled update frequency attempts per day is different than mine (default setting\Repeatedly, every 1 hour) but if you take a look at 2006 (http://www.eset.eu/support/update-xy1?month=all&year=2006&page_id=5846) and also what has already been delivered in 2007 (http://www.eset.eu/support/update-xy1?month=all&year=2007&page_id=5846) you'll see that updates per day are somewhat different than what you have described. Some days there have been none but most days per week have been 2, 3, 4 per day.
Bubba
Seer
March 8th, 2007, 12:44 PM
Hello HiTech_boy
Ah, I see. :) So, more malware if I got that correctly. Thank you for a prompt answer. :thumb: :thumb:
Regards.
trjam
March 8th, 2007, 12:49 PM
I figure more updates=more protection.:)
Seer
March 8th, 2007, 12:52 PM
Hello Bubba.
Honestly, I didn't check my updates settings before posting, but everything is automatic with me regarding sigs, and component set to "offer". Well, I probably overreacted a bit. I'll look with more attention to your suggestions regarding last year. Thank you.
EDIT: -{ Quote: "originally posted by trjam:
I figure more updates=more protection." }-
Of course, I was just curious if there occured some sudden rush of malwares on the market that is known of.
Regards.
mrtwolman
March 8th, 2007, 04:44 PM
ThreatSense is very reliable source of malware to keep our people busy.
Seer
March 8th, 2007, 07:12 PM
-{ Quote: "originally posted bt mrtwolman:
ThreatSense is very reliable source of malware to keep our people busy." }-
With NOD's heuristics taken into account, I lay double assured. :thumb:
Keep up the good work. Thank you all once more.
The Seer
binkko
March 8th, 2007, 10:08 PM
It's good news.
pykko
March 9th, 2007, 10:29 AM
the last 3 months NOD32 indeed had more signatures then before. 61 on february and 74 on january if I take only these 2 months for example. :)
rothko
March 9th, 2007, 11:52 AM
-{ Quote: "the last 3 months NOD32 indeed had more signatures then before. 61 on february and 74 on january if I take only these 2 months for example. :)" }-
by signatures i'm sure you mean updates :) 61 signatures a month and i think they'd be relying a little too much on heuristics!
Brian N
March 9th, 2007, 04:12 PM
-{ Quote: "by signatures i'm sure you mean updates :) 61 signatures a month and i think they'd be relying a little too much on heuristics!" }-
Yep I'm sure he means updates ;)
Blackspear
March 9th, 2007, 05:05 PM
JRCATES, your questions have been split off into a new thread HERE (http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=168069)
Cheers ;D
vBulletin® Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2012, Wilders Security Forums