PDA

View Full Version : Nod32, do I need anti-spyware as well?


Biscuit
February 8th, 2007, 01:53 PM
I'm currently getting a lot of problems trying to get AVG anti-spyware running & I also suspect that Windows Defender is causing problems on my Vista pc. As Nod32 appears to detect a lot of malware, is there any need for additional protection such as Defender or AVG AS?

ASpace
February 8th, 2007, 02:09 PM
Windows Defender is ON by default on Vista . I don't like this program so if you don't like it ,too , you can disable it permanently . With all the additional protections which Vista and IE7 have (Protected mode,UAC,etc...) + NOD32 which is excellent in detecting non-viral malware , I believe you can safely run without dedicated antispyware on Vista .
Don't forget to have all these checked in AMON because lots of crap (in my opinion) is categorised as pottentially unwanted/unsafe applications

Biscuit
February 8th, 2007, 04:44 PM
Thanks, Alex :P

I have UAC turned off as it pops up ALL the time & gets annoying. I also use Firefox, which I believe to be more secure than IE as it does not run ActiveX.

Is there anywhere that I can see exactly what Nod categorises as unsafe applications?

I am considering uninstalling Defender. Have you done this?

lodore
February 8th, 2007, 05:46 PM
if you want an extra on demand scanner download superantispyware free version and use that for scans sometimes
lodore

Biscuit
February 9th, 2007, 04:47 AM
That product looks interesting, thanks for the link.

ASpace
February 9th, 2007, 11:37 AM
-{ Quote: "I am considering uninstalling Defender. Have you done this?" }-

I'm running XP . Bulgaria still haven't received Vista so that we can't buy it. I'll be waiting for Vista SP1. The Office I asked about is for my XP ;)

About Defender , I'll do the same when I get Vista :thumb:

Biscuit
February 9th, 2007, 02:27 PM
Turning off UAC was the first thing I did, Alex! You won't believe how annoying it is! Now I'm itching to get rid of Defender! 8)

ASpace
February 9th, 2007, 02:34 PM
-{ Quote: "Turning off UAC was the first thing I did, Alex! You won't believe how annoying it is! Now I'm itching to get rid of Defender! 8)" }-

Ah , will see ...this UAC ... Doesn't running in Admin account stops the pop-ups/its questions ? I didn't know Firefox supports Vista but one learns until he/she is alive . I just got something about the topic , you can run online scanners if you really suspect something

Biscuit
February 9th, 2007, 05:52 PM
The admin account doesn't work like in XP. You still get popups asking for permission to install things. To run as admin, you have to right-click on a program. Firefox v2 in Vista is about the only thing that hasn't caused any issues!

On topic
I don't really suspect anything at the moment.

ejr
February 10th, 2007, 05:07 PM
-{ Quote: "I'm currently getting a lot of problems trying to get AVG anti-spyware running & I also suspect that Windows Defender is causing problems on my Vista pc. As Nod32 appears to detect a lot of malware, is there any need for additional protection such as Defender or AVG AS?" }-

Well, 2 years ago the sales rep that sold me NOD32 told me that all I would need to secure my PC was NOD32 and a good Firewall (he suggested Outpost).

That same sales rep today tells me that NOD32 is no longer enough. That you do need at least one designated antispyware application. What do I think? I think at a minumum you should have:

1. NOD32 or a competitive AV
2. A good Firewall
3. 2 designated antispyware applications.

But I am just an average joe, not a computer expert.

lodore
February 10th, 2007, 05:22 PM
well a separate antispyware program could be useful but not really a realtime one.
nod32 and firewall should be fine for realtime for the average joe who knows what is safe and what isnt.
superantispyware for on demand scans should be fine
you could also use avg antispyware for on demand scans and let it sink in to the free version
lodore

Biscuit
February 11th, 2007, 09:13 AM
Except that AVGAS doesn't even install in Vista.

I've decided to wait for both A-Squared & AVGAS get get their acts together & produce a Vista compatible version of their software.

arrowsmithmidwest
February 11th, 2007, 09:47 PM
-{ Quote: "Well, 2 years ago the sales rep that sold me NOD32 told me that all I would need to secure my PC was NOD32 and a good Firewall (he suggested Outpost).

That same sales rep today tells me that NOD32 is no longer enough. That you do need at least one designated antispyware application. What do I think? I think at a minumum you should have:

1. NOD32 or a competitive AV
2. A good Firewall
3. 2 designated antispyware applications.

But I am just an average joe, not a computer expert." }-

Your sales rep is right in the way that NOD32 is not enough protection, but wrong in the way that it never was enough. But then again, spyware was rarely an issue years ago, so it may have been not so bad.

For typical customers we ensure they have:
1. NOD 32 antivirus

2. XP built in firewall plus firewall on their router if possible. No extras like zone alarm etc. as they tend to stop ppl from doing their day to day business due to lack of knowledge.

3. 2 Designated spyware cleaners, Ad-aware SE and Spybot S&D. But these are not realtime (Spybot has optional teatimer that is realtime but again, customers don't agree with it, and it becomes annoying to them.) Explain that they need to scans fortnightly with spyware removals programs.

But with Vista, we have been just releying on Defender because it's real time, and find that it still does a decent enough job. So we havn't been so strong on putting on any extra spyware cleaners with Vista.

ASpace
February 12th, 2007, 11:14 AM
-{ Quote: "
3. 2 Designated spyware cleaners, Ad-aware SE and Spybot S&D. But these are not realtime (Spybot has optional teatimer that is realtime but again, customers don't agree with it, and it becomes annoying to them.) Explain that they need to scans fortnightly with spyware removals programs." }-

Spybot S&D have version 1.5 (which is BETA) and can be used on Vista . I find it stable but on my tests , it scanned slower than 1.4 (may be because it is BETA)