PDA

View Full Version : Is PG+RD=SSM?


vbnmu
December 5th, 2006, 04:56 PM
Is ProcessGuard + RegDefend = System Safety Monitor?

WSFuser
December 5th, 2006, 05:22 PM
thats one way to put it, but SSM is more powerful than that combo.

TECHWG
December 5th, 2006, 06:17 PM
I would agree . . SSM wins over that combo . . but there are others other than ssm too . .

[suave]
December 5th, 2006, 06:28 PM
-{ Quote: "Is ProcessGuard + RegDefend = System Safety Monitor?" }-
PG+RD < SSM

Basically with SSM you will be able to do everything the PG/RD combo can do plus have more control and a bit more features.

Plus it will cost you less money ;)

farmerlee
December 6th, 2006, 05:51 AM
-{ Quote: "Is ProcessGuard + RegDefend = System Safety Monitor?" }-
Yeah its similar but like the others said, probably not quite as effective. SSM is great but personally i find i prefer ghost security suite as its easier to use, and doesn't cause me any problems.

vbnmu
December 6th, 2006, 03:00 PM
-{ Quote: "I would agree . . SSM wins over that combo . . but there are others other than ssm too . ." }-
n which other ones? (other than prosecurity which didn't quite appeal to me)

Long View
December 9th, 2006, 05:22 PM
-{ Quote: "n which other ones? (other than prosecurity which didn't quite appeal to me)" }-

why not ProSecurity ? I have been testing it to destruction for 2 days and have so far found nothing I couldn't fix and I think its great - is there some major flaw that I'm missing ? or a better alternative ?

TECHWG
December 10th, 2006, 12:17 PM
-{ Quote: "n which other ones? (other than prosecurity which didn't quite appeal to me)" }-

I personally am extreamly baised since i have been helping the developer even before he knew about HIPS. I have given him as much help as i can and squeezed my brain for it as much as i humanly can in testing ideas and naming it. So i prefer PS over ssm because i know if i have ANY problems with PS that Jie (developer) can and will fix it ASAP and then everyone gets the benifates.