View Full Version : Icesword question
Rainwalker
July 29th, 2006, 12:46 PM
I have a few hundred RED entries under SSDT.........except for a few PG entries they are all under safemon.sys ...Would this be normal with SSM and PG running ?
WSFuser
July 29th, 2006, 01:05 PM
idk if a few hundred is normal but safemon.sys is part of SSM.
Rainwalker
July 29th, 2006, 01:18 PM
{QUOTE-> idk if a few hundred is normal but safemon.sys is part of SSM. <-QUOTE}
I realize safemon is part of SSM.........do not understand "idk if a few hundred is normal ".....................................i am guessing you are saying the SSM stuff and PG stuff are normal.....are you ?
WSFuser
July 29th, 2006, 01:40 PM
after having installed SSM, icesword does show numerous "safemon.sys" entries under SSDT.
yea i think its normal.
controler
July 31st, 2006, 09:54 AM
You get that on any program that hooks the kernel. The old thread on Ice Sword talks about all this. For instance if you have PG and KIS installed, you may see either all KIS in red or PG, depending on which one hooked first in boot.
con
Rainwalker
July 31st, 2006, 10:42 AM
{QUOTE-> You get that on any program that hooks the kernel. The old thread on Ice Sword talks about all this. For instance if you have PG and KIS installed, you may see either all KIS in red or PG, depending on which one hooked first in boot.
con <-QUOTE}
Thank you con...
vBulletin® Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2010, Wilders Security Forums