View Full Version : Bit Defender: False Positive
phasechange
July 15th, 2006, 04:55 PM
NOD32 and KAV6 say nothing but BitDefender says:
181291
This is part of windowblinds I think although windowblinds is still working. False positive?
Fairy
ASpace
July 15th, 2006, 05:56 PM
-{ Quote: "NOD32 and KAV6 say nothing but BitDefender says:
This is part of windowblinds I think although windowblinds is still working. False positive?
Fairy" }-Hi . From your picture I can't see the full path where infection is found .
Second , because of the file names I do see , it seems it is not a false positive . Third , if you still have a copy of them , submit them to VirusTotal (http://www.virustotal.com) and post the screenshot
Because of the fact KAV + NOD32 don't detect this , it doesn't make it clean
Good luck ! ;D
TonyW
July 15th, 2006, 09:17 PM
Sounds like HIVE scan results when it gives the result ""BehavesLike:Trojan.WinlogonHook". This is the heuristic scan result.
This is the sort of thing that I don't like about heuristics when legitimate files are flagged up as "BehavesLike:Trojan.*".
phasechange
July 15th, 2006, 11:20 PM
C:\Program Files\Stardock\Object Desktop\WindowBlinds this is the rest of the path.
I was disappointed to see that the online Bit Defender deletes without asking (EDIT: BUT I WAS WRONG I DIDN'T SPOT THE OPTIONS DIALOGUE, TWICE!)
Ok, I redownloaded WindowBlinds from Stardock and reinstalled it. This gave me wise_post.exe so I stumitted it to that site and lo the following result was generated:
http://www.fairyliquidizer.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/wisepost.png
Looks like overly enthusiastic heuristics to me.
Fairy
Firecat
July 16th, 2006, 12:02 AM
-{ Quote: "C:\Program Files\Stardock\Object Desktop\WindowBlinds this is the rest of the path.
I was disappointed to see that the online Bit Defender deletes without asking. A bit heavy handed for a heuristic scanner.
Ok, I redownloaded WindowBlinds from Stardock and reinstalled it. This gave me wise_post.exe so I stumitted it to that site and lo the following result was generated:
Looks like overly enthusiastic heuristics to me.
Fairy" }-
Send this file in a password-protected archive to support@bitdefender.com and explain that BD is detecting a false positive with this file.
StevieO
July 16th, 2006, 01:13 AM
In a similar way to their installed AV, the online version does actually give you quite a few options to select from.
http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/2087/bdbj7.png (http://imageshack.us)
http://www.bitdefender.com/scan8/ie.html
StevieO
phasechange
July 16th, 2006, 07:32 AM
Thanks Steve, that's what I get for doing these things when tired :-) Good because I want to use BitDefender as my backup scanner on this machine.
phasechange
July 16th, 2006, 07:45 AM
I tried to send it but get this response to password protected ZIP:
http://www.fairyliquidizer.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/attachment.png
got to go for lunch with my wife now will investigate on return.
Stefan Kurtzhals
July 16th, 2006, 08:38 AM
Most likely a false positive as Windows Blinds does indeed hook the Windows Logon procedure (legally).
phasechange
July 16th, 2006, 01:09 PM
hmm ok. After trying other Bit Defender addresses I eventually discovered that it was gmail that was refusing the attachment. Pain in the bum! Sent via my ISPs SMTP server.
Fairy
Firecat
July 16th, 2006, 01:24 PM
-{ Quote: "hmm ok. After trying other Bit Defender addresses I eventually discovered that it was gmail that was refusing the attachment. Pain in the bum! Sent via my ISPs SMTP server.
Fairy" }-
You could always rename the file extension while sending it to BitDefender. GMAIL refuses EXE files in archives as attachments.
phasechange
July 16th, 2006, 02:01 PM
ah ok. I don't send them very often and I can understand why. Yip next time I'll do that.
vBulletin® Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2012, Wilders Security Forums