PDA

View Full Version : nod32.com unreachable???


martindijk
September 14th, 2003, 10:24 AM
Hi all,

Anybody else having trouble reaching www.nod32.com??

Had to change to www.esetsoftware.com

rgds,
Martin

Madsen DK
September 14th, 2003, 11:04 AM
Me too, but it works again now. :)

Paul Wilders
September 15th, 2003, 09:13 AM
This can happen in case the webmaster is updating pages and/or database updates. It'll take not that much time, so try once more after half an hour or so when you've encountered this ;)

regards.

paul

martindijk
September 15th, 2003, 12:19 PM
Hi Paul,

This isn't something what's going on for some minutes or hours, this is some days now.

It is not a big thing, i have switched to esetsoftware.com, and all works well now ;)

rgds,
Martin

mrtwolman
September 15th, 2003, 12:57 PM
Maybe some kind of DNS problem ?

jan
September 15th, 2003, 01:13 PM
Hi,

>Anybody else having trouble reaching www.nod32.com??

Still having that problem? No problems here. If yes, pls. reply with more details.

Thx., :)

jan

martindijk
September 15th, 2003, 01:25 PM
Hi Jan,

Yes, still not reachable.

What kind of details are you refering to, the site is unreachable, thats it.

rgds,
Martin

martindijk
September 15th, 2003, 01:33 PM
Jan, the same goes for eset.sk, unreachable

rgds,
Martin

martindijk
September 15th, 2003, 01:44 PM
Will this help??

-{ Quote: "Time***Module***Event***User
15-09-2003 19:31:55***Update***Update attempt terminated with error (Server connection failure)***martin
15-09-2003 19:31:22***Update***Update attempt terminated with error (Server connection failure)***martin
15-09-2003 19:29:38***Update***Error connecting to server www.eset.sk.***martin
15-09-2003 19:29:17***Update***Error connecting to server www.nod32.com.***martin
14-09-2003 15:35:57***Update***Function: gethostbyname, parameters: , return value: 11001***martin
14-09-2003 15:35:56***Update***Update attempt terminated with error (Server connection failure.)***martin
14-09-2003 12:20:19***Update***Function: gethostbyname, parameters: , return value: 11001***martin
14-09-2003 12:20:18***Update***Update attempt terminated with error (Server connection failure.)***martin
" }-

rgds,
Martin

jan
September 15th, 2003, 02:20 PM
OK, go for the www.esetsoftware.com for now - we'll check it and get back to you. As I wrote, here it's OK - I hope in the other places too.

Thx., :D

jan

martindijk
September 15th, 2003, 02:24 PM
Oké Jan, thanks.

I will be on the lookout ;)

rgds,
Martin

Paul Wilders
September 15th, 2003, 06:39 PM
Rather akward - the www.nod32.com server works flawlessly over here on several systems...

regards,

paul

Daniel M
September 15th, 2003, 10:29 PM
www.nod32.com working good for me also. ;D

Daniel

jan
September 16th, 2003, 04:27 AM
Hi Martin,

forgot to ask you, if you've checked all points in this FAQ. (http://www.nod32.com/support/ans/4d.htm)

Thks, :)

jan

martindijk
September 16th, 2003, 10:51 AM
Sorry jan, i can't open it, it's a faq from nod32.com :'(

rgds,
Martin

Pieter_Arntz
September 16th, 2003, 10:55 AM
Martin,

Have you checked your hosts file?
Just wondering because of this:
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=13664;start=msg87830#msg87830

Regards,

Pieter

jan
September 16th, 2003, 11:25 AM
Martin,

the Pieter's advice looks also reasonable, or you can try that FAQ on www.esetsoftware.com - here. (http://www.esetsoftware.com/support/ans/4d.htm)

Rgds, :)

jan

martindijk
September 16th, 2003, 12:12 PM
Hi Jan, this is my "hosts" content.

rgds,
Martin

-{ Quote: "# Copyright (c) 1993-1999 Microsoft Corp.
#
# This is a sample HOSTS file used by Microsoft TCP/IP for Windows.
#
# This file contains the mappings of IP addresses to host names. Each
# entry should be kept on an individual line. The IP address should
# be placed in the first column followed by the corresponding host name.
# The IP address and the host name should be separated by at least one
# space.
#
# Additionally, comments (such as these) may be inserted on individual
# lines or following the machine name denoted by a '#' symbol.
#
# For example:
#
# 102.54.94.97 rhino.acme.com # source server
# 38.25.63.10 x.acme.com # x client host

127.0.0.1 localhost
" }-

martindijk
September 16th, 2003, 12:38 PM
Jan, i can't even "ping" the site, very strange ???

Nothing changed in my configuration since i could reach the site.

Is it possible that the Nod's IP is jammed somewhere??

rgds,
Martin

Madsen DK
September 16th, 2003, 01:44 PM
This is strange, Martin. ???
No probs here either.

radicalb21
September 16th, 2003, 04:49 PM
Hey Martin,
It's radicalb21. You told me to try http://www.eset.com/home/home.htm when I had the same problem your having now. I would suggest delete cookies, temp files and cache. Then restart the system and try with the link suggested above. Also here is a copy of ping times for different eset sites.

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\v1ru5>ping www.eset.com

Pinging www.eset.com [64.82.99.22] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.82.99.22: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=43
Reply from 64.82.99.22: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=43
Reply from 64.82.99.22: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=43
Reply from 64.82.99.22: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=43

Ping statistics for 64.82.99.22:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 39ms, Maximum = 40ms, Average = 39ms

C:\Documents and Settings\v1ru5>ping www.eset.sk

Pinging www.eset.sk [195.12.128.61] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 195.12.128.61: bytes=32 time=139ms TTL=233
Reply from 195.12.128.61: bytes=32 time=173ms TTL=233
Reply from 195.12.128.61: bytes=32 time=200ms TTL=233
Reply from 195.12.128.61: bytes=32 time=173ms TTL=233

Ping statistics for 195.12.128.61:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 139ms, Maximum = 200ms, Average = 171ms

C:\Documents and Settings\v1ru5>ping www.esetsoftware.com

Pinging esetsoftware.com [64.82.106.116] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.82.106.116: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=43
Reply from 64.82.106.116: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=43
Reply from 64.82.106.116: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=43
Reply from 64.82.106.116: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=43

Ping statistics for 64.82.106.116:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 41ms, Maximum = 50ms, Average = 44ms

I get roughly the same ping times from the ip address lookup as well. Hope this helps.

martindijk
September 17th, 2003, 12:53 PM
Hi all,

Now when i got to www.nod32.com, iam relayed to
http://home.euroweb.sk/index.jsp ???

Have deleted cookies, temp and cache, no luck

marti
September 17th, 2003, 01:04 PM
Martin,

The servers are sick! I was able to get to http://www.nod32.com/support/info.htm one time, but they hadn't updated the list of files in the current update.

Antarctica
September 17th, 2003, 01:16 PM
Impossible to update to-day. It says "FILE NOT FOUND".

martindijk
September 17th, 2003, 01:33 PM
Well, finally Nod32.com is back, but loading extremely slow.

rgds,
Martin

martindijk
September 17th, 2003, 01:45 PM
Spoke to soon :'(

rgds,
Martin

Buster
September 17th, 2003, 10:33 PM
Hi Martin,

www.nod32.com working for me too, although site is loading a little slow.

Rgds

Buster

martindijk
September 18th, 2003, 12:17 PM
I'll guess the matter is solved now, Nod32.com is loading like it always does :D

rgds,
Martin

Antarctica
September 18th, 2003, 05:11 PM
Same thing here. ;)