View Full Version : nod32.com unreachable???
martindijk
September 14th, 2003, 10:24 AM
Hi all,
Anybody else having trouble reaching www.nod32.com??
Had to change to www.esetsoftware.com
rgds,
Martin
Madsen DK
September 14th, 2003, 11:04 AM
Me too, but it works again now. :)
Paul Wilders
September 15th, 2003, 09:13 AM
This can happen in case the webmaster is updating pages and/or database updates. It'll take not that much time, so try once more after half an hour or so when you've encountered this ;)
regards.
paul
martindijk
September 15th, 2003, 12:19 PM
Hi Paul,
This isn't something what's going on for some minutes or hours, this is some days now.
It is not a big thing, i have switched to esetsoftware.com, and all works well now ;)
rgds,
Martin
mrtwolman
September 15th, 2003, 12:57 PM
Maybe some kind of DNS problem ?
jan
September 15th, 2003, 01:13 PM
Hi,
>Anybody else having trouble reaching www.nod32.com??
Still having that problem? No problems here. If yes, pls. reply with more details.
Thx., :)
jan
martindijk
September 15th, 2003, 01:25 PM
Hi Jan,
Yes, still not reachable.
What kind of details are you refering to, the site is unreachable, thats it.
rgds,
Martin
martindijk
September 15th, 2003, 01:33 PM
Jan, the same goes for eset.sk, unreachable
rgds,
Martin
martindijk
September 15th, 2003, 01:44 PM
Will this help??
-{ Quote: "Time***Module***Event***User
15-09-2003 19:31:55***Update***Update attempt terminated with error (Server connection failure)***martin
15-09-2003 19:31:22***Update***Update attempt terminated with error (Server connection failure)***martin
15-09-2003 19:29:38***Update***Error connecting to server www.eset.sk.***martin
15-09-2003 19:29:17***Update***Error connecting to server www.nod32.com.***martin
14-09-2003 15:35:57***Update***Function: gethostbyname, parameters: , return value: 11001***martin
14-09-2003 15:35:56***Update***Update attempt terminated with error (Server connection failure.)***martin
14-09-2003 12:20:19***Update***Function: gethostbyname, parameters: , return value: 11001***martin
14-09-2003 12:20:18***Update***Update attempt terminated with error (Server connection failure.)***martin
" }-
rgds,
Martin
jan
September 15th, 2003, 02:20 PM
OK, go for the www.esetsoftware.com for now - we'll check it and get back to you. As I wrote, here it's OK - I hope in the other places too.
Thx., :D
jan
martindijk
September 15th, 2003, 02:24 PM
Oké Jan, thanks.
I will be on the lookout ;)
rgds,
Martin
Paul Wilders
September 15th, 2003, 06:39 PM
Rather akward - the www.nod32.com server works flawlessly over here on several systems...
regards,
paul
Daniel M
September 15th, 2003, 10:29 PM
www.nod32.com working good for me also. ;D
Daniel
jan
September 16th, 2003, 04:27 AM
Hi Martin,
forgot to ask you, if you've checked all points in this FAQ. (http://www.nod32.com/support/ans/4d.htm)
Thks, :)
jan
martindijk
September 16th, 2003, 10:51 AM
Sorry jan, i can't open it, it's a faq from nod32.com :'(
rgds,
Martin
Pieter_Arntz
September 16th, 2003, 10:55 AM
Martin,
Have you checked your hosts file?
Just wondering because of this:
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=13664;start=msg87830#msg87830
Regards,
Pieter
jan
September 16th, 2003, 11:25 AM
Martin,
the Pieter's advice looks also reasonable, or you can try that FAQ on www.esetsoftware.com - here. (http://www.esetsoftware.com/support/ans/4d.htm)
Rgds, :)
jan
martindijk
September 16th, 2003, 12:12 PM
Hi Jan, this is my "hosts" content.
rgds,
Martin
-{ Quote: "# Copyright (c) 1993-1999 Microsoft Corp.
#
# This is a sample HOSTS file used by Microsoft TCP/IP for Windows.
#
# This file contains the mappings of IP addresses to host names. Each
# entry should be kept on an individual line. The IP address should
# be placed in the first column followed by the corresponding host name.
# The IP address and the host name should be separated by at least one
# space.
#
# Additionally, comments (such as these) may be inserted on individual
# lines or following the machine name denoted by a '#' symbol.
#
# For example:
#
# 102.54.94.97 rhino.acme.com # source server
# 38.25.63.10 x.acme.com # x client host
127.0.0.1 localhost
" }-
martindijk
September 16th, 2003, 12:38 PM
Jan, i can't even "ping" the site, very strange ???
Nothing changed in my configuration since i could reach the site.
Is it possible that the Nod's IP is jammed somewhere??
rgds,
Martin
Madsen DK
September 16th, 2003, 01:44 PM
This is strange, Martin. ???
No probs here either.
radicalb21
September 16th, 2003, 04:49 PM
Hey Martin,
It's radicalb21. You told me to try http://www.eset.com/home/home.htm when I had the same problem your having now. I would suggest delete cookies, temp files and cache. Then restart the system and try with the link suggested above. Also here is a copy of ping times for different eset sites.
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
C:\Documents and Settings\v1ru5>ping www.eset.com
Pinging www.eset.com [64.82.99.22] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.82.99.22: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=43
Reply from 64.82.99.22: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=43
Reply from 64.82.99.22: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=43
Reply from 64.82.99.22: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=43
Ping statistics for 64.82.99.22:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 39ms, Maximum = 40ms, Average = 39ms
C:\Documents and Settings\v1ru5>ping www.eset.sk
Pinging www.eset.sk [195.12.128.61] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 195.12.128.61: bytes=32 time=139ms TTL=233
Reply from 195.12.128.61: bytes=32 time=173ms TTL=233
Reply from 195.12.128.61: bytes=32 time=200ms TTL=233
Reply from 195.12.128.61: bytes=32 time=173ms TTL=233
Ping statistics for 195.12.128.61:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 139ms, Maximum = 200ms, Average = 171ms
C:\Documents and Settings\v1ru5>ping www.esetsoftware.com
Pinging esetsoftware.com [64.82.106.116] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.82.106.116: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=43
Reply from 64.82.106.116: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=43
Reply from 64.82.106.116: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=43
Reply from 64.82.106.116: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=43
Ping statistics for 64.82.106.116:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 41ms, Maximum = 50ms, Average = 44ms
I get roughly the same ping times from the ip address lookup as well. Hope this helps.
martindijk
September 17th, 2003, 12:53 PM
Hi all,
Now when i got to www.nod32.com, iam relayed to
http://home.euroweb.sk/index.jsp ???
Have deleted cookies, temp and cache, no luck
marti
September 17th, 2003, 01:04 PM
Martin,
The servers are sick! I was able to get to http://www.nod32.com/support/info.htm one time, but they hadn't updated the list of files in the current update.
Antarctica
September 17th, 2003, 01:16 PM
Impossible to update to-day. It says "FILE NOT FOUND".
martindijk
September 17th, 2003, 01:33 PM
Well, finally Nod32.com is back, but loading extremely slow.
rgds,
Martin
martindijk
September 17th, 2003, 01:45 PM
Spoke to soon :'(
rgds,
Martin
Buster
September 17th, 2003, 10:33 PM
Hi Martin,
www.nod32.com working for me too, although site is loading a little slow.
Rgds
Buster
martindijk
September 18th, 2003, 12:17 PM
I'll guess the matter is solved now, Nod32.com is loading like it always does :D
rgds,
Martin
Antarctica
September 18th, 2003, 05:11 PM
Same thing here. ;)
vBulletin® Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2012, Wilders Security Forums