PDA

View Full Version : Proxomitron, is it any good?


minacross
September 10th, 2003, 01:38 PM
Using it, does it make me more secured over the internet? ??? ???

http://www.proxomitron.info/

notageek
September 10th, 2003, 02:08 PM
Yes to a point. As long as you have the right filter set it should be pretty secure. Some claim the Proxo even masks your IP but you would have to use a HTTP proxy. I have been toying with my proxo every since I downloaded and I got to know how to use it to a point. ;) But Proxo can hide browser referrer and stuff like that. There's a lso web bug filter sets that block web bug. Proxo has a little learning curve though but there is a forum for proxo (2 I think). I find proxo works really good with IE.

peakaboo
September 10th, 2003, 06:20 PM
works real good with Opera too.

if you use it for Opera get a good Ad blocker (since adshield will be no good for u) & an Iframe killer (not really needed if you disable inline frames) but will defeat the malware exploit if you have both frames & inline frames enabled in Opera preferences.

ck here:

http://asp.flaaten.dk/proxo/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=33


and here:

http://asp.flaaten.dk/proxo/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1012

n8chavez
September 12th, 2003, 12:55 PM
Proxomitron is as good a web-filter as you will find on the net simply because of the basic fuctions/architecture. Ther is a learning curve involed. However it is not as great of one as others would have you believe. Do do to the form (posted earlier on this thread) and read some of the threads there. In my opinion the best configuration for a "newbie" would be JD5000's "basic" configuration. Also, it is possible to filter out or block your IP address from being trasmitted without using an anonymous proxy. The easies way to do this, once you have proxomitron, would be to merge your current filter with the filter from Jakx. Also, you will want to filter out Java IP retrieval applets. Use this filter to do this:

[Patterns]
Name = "Applet change class w/Indicator"
Active = TRUE
URL = "($TYPE(htm)&(^$LST(AllowApplet)(^$LST(AllowJS))))"
Bounds = "$NEST(<applet,</applet>)"
Limit = 1012
Match = "*"
Replace = "<img src="\dhtml/devs.gif" height="25" width="18">"

If you nedd specific help on how to do this PM me. I'll be happy to help you.

P.S. I know this is not a proxomitron forum but since the questions were askied I thought I'd help.

peakaboo
September 12th, 2003, 03:03 PM
-{ Quote: " quoting: n8chavez link=board=20;threadid=13598;start=0#msg87255 date=1063385724]
In my opinion the best configuration for a "newbie" would be JD5000's "basic" configuration. Also, it is possible to filter out or block your IP address from being trasmitted without using an anonymous proxy. The easies way to do this, once you have proxomitron, would be to merge your current filter with the filter from Jakx. Also, you will want to filter out Java IP retrieval applets.
" }-

n8,

If you are referring to Jakx ip spoofer, it does not make your IP annonymous as discussed here:

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=6800

try your proxo IP mask here:

https://testzone.secunia.com/browser_checker/

If you are referring to another filter please fill us in.

Also good point about Java IP retrieval applet.

I use something similar which kills any Java Applet which I have not OKd.

n8chavez
September 12th, 2003, 04:37 PM
I am refering to Jakx's IP spoofer. However the use of it requires some tweaking. You will need to ïnsert your IP address into the filter; which depending on if you have a synamic or static IP address can be difficult to do. That needs to be done so the filter will know what to block. This is the particular filter I was talking about, which I believe is part of Jaxk's config:

In = FALSE
Out = TRUE
Key = "Cookie: 0 Replace IP Address (out)"
Match = "\0INSERT.YOUR.IP.HERE\2"
Replace = "\0$LST(ClientIP)\1\2"

This used in conjunction with the Java applet grabber I listed previously should block you IP, or more correctly spoof your IP

peakaboo
September 12th, 2003, 06:39 PM
-{ Quote: " quoting: n8chavez link=board=20;threadid=13598;start=0#msg87304 date=1063399072]
I am refering to Jakx's IP spoofer. However the use of it requires some tweaking.

" }-

N8, hate to say it, but, the more I look at your suggested altered filter the more skeptical I become.

My reasons are:

1) when I looked at Jakx IP spoofer initially, I looked at the source JakBENymble (http://asp.flaaten.dk/proxo/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=173) and understood how his filter worked. I just revisited the source and nothing new added. One would think that the source would have this addendum if it were viable.

2) I'm no techy but doubt very seriously that IP address & ID of same is dependent in anyway on a cookie which is the implication of the suggested header filter.

Additional Questions for N8:

+ Will your altered Jakx filter work with any version of Proxo?

+ Did you invent the alteration to Jakx filter or did you get it somewhere? If you found it please provide source.

+ You never answered this question. Please answer how this Altered Jakx filter does against this:

https://testzone.secunia.com/browser_checker/

if you get a chance how does it do here:

http://www.a861.com/cgi-bin/test-env.pl

here:

http://www.lagado.com/proxy-test

and here:

http://privacy.net/analyze/

*********************************************

Ok I tried it, maybe I'm doing something wrong, or maybe it just doesn't work. It did not work 4me.

Using a config which included Jakx IP spoofer, I added to web filters:

[Patterns]
Name = "Applet change class w/Indicator"
Active = TRUE
URL = "($TYPE(htm)&(^$LST(AllowApplet)(^$LST(AllowJS))))"
Bounds = "$NEST(<applet,</applet>)"
Limit = 1012
Match = "*"
Replace = "<img src="\dhtml/devs.gif" height="25" width="18">"

looks like in my lists folder I need to add the 2 referenced lists above AllowApplet & AllowJS, I can't find anything else.

and

under header filters I added:

In = FALSE
Out = TRUE
Key = "Cookie: 0 Replace IP Address (out)"
Match = "\0andINSERTed.My.dynamicIP.HERE\2"
Replace = "\0$LST(ClientIP)\1\2"

notageek
September 12th, 2003, 11:57 PM
I stand on my belief that you need to use a proxy to get the IP spoffers to work with Proxo. I downloaded unzipped the Jakx ip spoof filter and used it without a Proxy ( I don't use a proxy) and it still showed my IP addy and other stuff. I tried it the way N8 stated to do and it still showed my IP addy. I think hiding you IP addy with proxo without a proxy is not possible.

peakaboo
September 13th, 2003, 12:41 AM
-{ Quote: " quoting: minacross link=board=20;threadid=13598;start=0#msg86647 date=1063215499]
Using it, does it make me more secured over the internet? ??? ???

http://www.proxomitron.info/
" }-

back to original question.

I think the answer is yes Proxo can make you more secure as part of a layered defense as notageek pointed out initially (quoted below).

example go here:

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=11975

and try exploit #4 without proper defense. read all warnings first :)

also agree with notageek here:

-{ Quote: " Yes to a point. As long as you have the right filter set it should be pretty secure. Some claim the Proxo even masks your IP but you would have to use a HTTP proxy.

I stand on my belief that you need to use a proxy to get the IP spoffers to work with Proxo. I downloaded unzipped the Jakx ip spoof filter and used it without a Proxy ( I don't use a proxy) and it still showed my IP addy and other stuff. I tried it the way N8 stated to do and it still showed my IP addy. I think hiding you IP addy with proxo without a proxy is not possible. " }-

agree, till proven otherwise

n8 I would love to see you prove us wrong here :)

*****************************

also remember more secure is not necessarily synonymous with a cloaked or anonymous IP addy

also take very seriously the concept of man in the middle exploit with regards to using anonymous proxies

minacross
September 13th, 2003, 05:19 AM
thanx guys :)

JayK
September 13th, 2003, 09:59 AM
If you can't beat them, confuse them!

n8chavez
September 13th, 2003, 01:24 PM
I can see I really inginted a discussion. Hopefully after today I will have solved my internet issues (switching from DSL to cable). Then I will be able to answer all your queswtions. Right now I'm at the library so I don't have proxo running. I will answer questions, and in some cases critics :), when I am able to.

n8chavez
September 13th, 2003, 01:32 PM
Also, you most certainly can use anon proxies if you want to; which can also be used in proxomtron (to eliminated complations of chaining) That most certainly can be done. I was just rying to say there are other ways of doing the same thing.

If you do chose to use anon proxies check to see if there are truly anonymous, can be done via the log in proxo, or if their anonimity is just a "front"so to speak. Some änonymous"proxies reveal the user. Here is a list of anon proxies: (check before use). Again I will answer more specific questions when I can.

peakaboo
September 13th, 2003, 01:35 PM
-{ Quote: " quoting: JayK link=board=20;threadid=13598;start=0#msg87463 date=1063461597]
If you can't beat them, confuse them!
" }-

Confusion is the essence of the Jakx fake IP spoofer.

Bottom line, my view is: Jakx IP spoofer filter was not designed to mask or cloak, just confuse. It does exactly what it purports it will do. I still think this is a good add to your arsenal, you just need to understand it will not hide your IP

Just found this from JackBeNymble and I will enable header filter close connection in & out for my Jakx config since if I recall many proxy testing sites would catch as not a real proxy:

*************************

http://asp.flaaten.dk/proxo/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=173

If You use "Spoofers", to make Your "FAKE PROXY" look more "real" to the sites, You need to enable the "Connection: Close all connections (In+Out)" Filter. This will make it look more like You are behind a Remote Proxy to the sites. Here is the Connection Filter just in case it doesn't come with the Original Default.config's.:

In = TRUE
Out = TRUE
Key = "Connection: Close all connections (In+Out)"
Replace = "close"

And remember to tick both the "IN" & "OUT" box for the Filter.

peakaboo
September 13th, 2003, 02:00 PM
-{ Quote: " quoting: n8chavez link=board=20;threadid=13598;start=0#msg87532 date=1063473847]
Hopefully after today I will have solved my internet issues (switching from DSL to cable). Then I will be able to answer all your queswtions. Right now I'm at the library so I don't have proxo running. I will answer questions, and in some cases critics :), when I am able to.
" }-

Don't take our comments to set the record straight, as we see it, as criticism. It is not intended as such.

I hope within a weeks time you can prove my comments wrong. If you do, I'll be among the first to give ya props.

On the other hand if no response, in a reasonable amount of time, I think one can conclude the obvious.

BTW don't forget to take these Q's on:

Additional Questions for N8:

+ Will your altered Jakx filter work with any version of Proxo 4.x and above?

+ Did you invent the alteration to Jakx filter or did you get it somewhere? If you found it please provide source.

+ You never answered this question. Please answer how this Altered Jakx filter does against this:

https://testzone.secunia.com/browser_checker/

if you get a chance how does it do here:

http://www.a861.com/cgi-bin/test-env.pl

here:

http://www.lagado.com/proxy-test

and here:

http://privacy.net/analyze/




OT - whoa nellie!!!! I just hit PF11 by mistake in Opera (very nice feature full screen toggle, right click mouse to stop & go back, middle mouse to move up & down (and side to side & diag. coming in vs 7.2 (they are on 7.2b11 now and looking like they are getting real close to a final release) :)

peakaboo
September 14th, 2003, 05:32 PM
-{ Quote: " quoting: minacross link=board=20;threadid=13598;start=0#msg86647 date=1063215499]
Using it, does it make me more secured over the internet? ??? ???

http://www.proxomitron.info/
" }-

I ran across this recently, thought you might be interested:

http://www.computercops.biz/postt5542.html

excerpt:

query kpfuser posted:

-{ Quote: "
My interest in Proxomitron stems from the fact that it has been recommended as an add-on security feature to my firewall. However, to be convinced of its merits as a security device, I need to resolve the following:

Does proxomitron act as a local proxy? If yes, do loopback vulnerability issues arise as a result? " }-

Onlooker responded:

-{ Quote: "Yes, Prox does act as a local proxy. There is a possibility that something using the loopback address can tunnel through a firewall via the proxy. If you use a rule-based firewall, you can get around this by allowing use of the loopback address only on an application-by-application basis. I have a rule in Kerio firewall following these permission rules which blocks anything else from using the loopback, and it is set to alert me about anything trying to do that. " }-

note from Peakaboo: since I'm not a techy I don't feel I am in a position to validate any of what Onlooker posted, but sure made me sit up and take notice. Made a lot of sense to me. I will be adding some new loopback rules to my firewall as a result.

Proxomitron is one of the best utilities I have. I can't imagine surfing the net without it. :)

Thanks Scott

notageek
September 14th, 2003, 08:28 PM
I used sygate free firewall and there was a loopback problem with sygate and proxo. Sygate would let programs piggyback on proxo to get out. I dropped sygate. I'm not sure if the pro version is like that. I was scared it was so I just didn't buy the pro version. I think ZA is safe when it comes to the loopback thing. Kerio is also safe from what heard.

jer03
September 15th, 2003, 12:03 AM
I use free Kerio firewall.
How do I do this?
Quote
"If you use a rule-based firewall, you can get around this by allowing use of the loopback address only on an application-by-application basis. I have a rule in Kerio firewall following these permission rules which blocks anything else from using the loopback, and it is set to alert me about anything trying to do that."

Thanks,
Jerry

LowWaterMark
September 16th, 2003, 04:58 PM
-{ Quote: " quoting: jer03 link=board=20;threadid=13598;start=15#msg87810 date=1063598603]I use free Kerio firewall.
How do I do this?
Quote
"If you use a rule-based firewall, you can get around this by allowing use of the loopback address only on an application-by-application basis. I have a rule in Kerio firewall following these permission rules which blocks anything else from using the loopback, and it is set to alert me about anything trying to do that."" }-

Hi Jerry,

Take a look at the very bottom of the post linked below. It's just a short paragraph on securing a local proxy in Kerio, but, you can ask more questions on details over in that forum section.

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=12679;start=msg81590#msg81590

I hope that helps,
LowWaterMark

manythanks
September 21st, 2003, 01:30 PM
So as I remember the question "is it any good"?.

Thanks

notageek
September 21st, 2003, 01:44 PM
-{ Quote: " quoting: manythanks link=board=20;threadid=13598;start=15#msg89126 date=1064165441]
So as I remember the question "is it any good"?.

Thanks
" }-

It looks like there was answers to the question. I think that a few people answered the question.

manythanks
September 21st, 2003, 01:51 PM
You dont understand, I dont want people saying yes but you must do this and that, I want people to say a definate yes.

Thanks

notageek
September 21st, 2003, 01:56 PM
Yes it's good.

manythanks
September 21st, 2003, 02:09 PM
Thanks You, I'll still use any way.

Thanks

notageek
September 21st, 2003, 02:12 PM
OK but I gave you an answer.

manythanks
September 21st, 2003, 02:21 PM
Indeed you did.

Thanks

JayK
September 23rd, 2003, 06:21 AM
-{ Quote: " quoting: manythanks link=board=20;threadid=13598;start=15#msg89129 date=1064166680]
You dont understand, I dont want people saying yes but you must do this and that, I want people to say a definate yes.

Thanks
" }-

Yes it good if you know how to use it properly [obviously].

2 caverts

loopback rules with firewalls already mentioned

and

It doesn't grant you any annoymity when surfing unless you find a remote proxy. Still this is a privacy issue not a security issue.

Security through obscurity is not security at all.

Rickster
September 24th, 2003, 05:18 AM
Best thing since sliced bread. Yes, anonymity requires a remote proxy, but a local proxy like Proxo kills the referrer function that tells where you go on the web and some other system information. Whlie privacy enhancing, it kills nosy java scripts, ergo pop-ups, redirectors and any other exploits you can happen on while surfing. Most of which you have to disable in your IE security settings to accomplish. Yes, you have to bypass the program and unclick the use proxy setting in your IE connection tab to update patches, or any other function that requires intrusive scripting, but it's a minor step for all the added security you gain. I consider Proxo as a much a vital and incredibly effective secuity tool than any added privacy it happens to afford. I say, go for it.

Later, Rick

peakaboo
October 3rd, 2003, 03:38 PM
-{ Quote: " quoting: n8chavez link=board=20;threadid=13598;start=0#msg87532 date=1063473847]
I can see I really inginted a discussion. Hopefully after today I will have solved my internet issues (switching from DSL to cable). Then I will be able to answer all your queswtions. Right now I'm at the library so I don't have proxo running. I will answer questions, and in some cases critics :), when I am able to.
" }-

just for the record, n8chavez did not respond in a reasonable amount of time, so I will.

Jakx ip spoofer, does not make your IP anonymous, as discussed here:

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=6800

it performs well as intended as an ip spoofer

maybe the real issue was terminology, ip blocking, is not spoofing, and spoofing does not provide anonymity.

You may draw any conclusion you wish, but I think setting the record straight for those who may happen upon misinformation is important.

Most people if they can provide support for their claim, will do so. If not they either admit they were wrong, or they go silent.

Not being mean here just dealing with the latter category (i.e. silence) to avoid obfuscation & misinformation.

peakaboo
December 21st, 2003, 12:18 AM
JD5000 filter set & home here:

http://www.jd5000.net/index.php

also thought it a good idea to paste this here:

-{ Quote: " quoting: peakaboo link=board=13;threadid=17293;start=30#msg110033 date=1071345319]
-{ Quote: " quoting: Morgoth link=board=13;threadid=17293;start=30#msg109374 date=1071164924]

I was talking about a simple little app, that is, not part of a bigger prog (such as FW, browser, ...).

Actually, these are not that easy to find - U get ad-killers, privacy-enforcers, script-blockers, but never all 3 in 1... Perhaps you may have heard of one? (PS. it has to be small, and free )
" }-

caught the tail end of this conversation...

if it doesn't help don't use

1 word 4 syllables

Proxomitron

gives you 3 in 1 & more and is free

if you use it out of the box, you will get all you need.

http://www.proxomitron.info/files/index.shtml

use the June version of 4.5

more info: http://www.proxomitron.info/

another source here: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prox-list/files/

you have to register for the Proxomitron forum at Yahoo to use their download.

Once you get the hang of it explore other filter sets such as AltoSax filter set - which includes the Jax's IP spoofer... web bug killers, iframe killers, activeX killers and much more.

http://www.computercops.biz/downloads-file-149.html

if you use Proxo, make sure your firewall loopback rules are set up properly, the following link will also help you set up your DNS rules also...

Loopback DNS & other Rules (http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6642367~root=kerio~mode=flat)

some more tips here (post#11 page 2):

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=5367;start=15#bot


if you are looking to improve your safety on-line change your browser ( really nice light aps like Opera & Firebird)

" }-

enjoy 8)