Comodo v Kerio regarding system slow down

[aigle]

I have used Kerio since many months and recently downloaded Comodo personal direwall to give it a try.
While using Kerio, I did feel a bit slow down on my system caused by Kerio though practically it was quite tolerable.
I will like to know from any users who have used both Kerio and Comodo, out of these two which one causes more slow dwon of system.
Thanks.

[aigle]

!! I think, not so many people compared the two firewall!
BTW, I did saw many post from users of both in the past.

[sded]

I just started using CPF after using KPF 4.2.2 for some time. Qualitatively, CPF seems a bit faster than KPF, but haven't really measured it. Neither one seems to be a big drag on the system, at least with moderate rulesets.

[djg05]

-{ Quote: "I will like to know from any users who have used both Kerio and Comodo, out of these two which one causes more slow dwon of system.
Thanks." }-

I recently installed Comodo and found it slowed my system down after using Kerio. This was especially when browsing. When I reverted to Kerio there was a noticeable increase in speed.

I see on the Comodo forum they have just released an update which they say addresses the speed issue - maybe it would be worth trying that one.

[aigle]

I installed this new version of Comodo and I did not fell any drag on system. I can say both slow down the system just a little almost to the smae extent.
However i suspect application execution monitoring in Kerio might cause a little more slow down in addition but this portion can be disabled.