jldefoa
February 1st, 2006, 01:16 PM
I used TI9 to clone my 40 GB notebook HD onto a new 60 GB HD. It didn't work when I tried to adjust the new drive's partitions manually ("worked" all day - 7+ hours while I was busy doing other things!) but did NOTHING.
So, I tried the other method, which copied the existing drive and left unused space at the end. That seemed to work, except it clobbered my LILO, so when I swapped the new drive from the USB enclosure into the notebook itself, all I got at boot up was L 99 99 99 99 99 99 (etc.).
When I examined the drives using Partition Magic, it reports the new drive's "C:" partition is 14,566.8 MB, while the original is 14,566.7! I suspect that 0.1 MB difference has thrown off the geometry for LILO. So much for a sector by sector copy!
This is hardly what I'd call success.
I'm about ready to just boot into a Linux shell, us dd to copy it, and tell others to avoid the hassle of using TI.
Lance De Foa
So, I tried the other method, which copied the existing drive and left unused space at the end. That seemed to work, except it clobbered my LILO, so when I swapped the new drive from the USB enclosure into the notebook itself, all I got at boot up was L 99 99 99 99 99 99 (etc.).
When I examined the drives using Partition Magic, it reports the new drive's "C:" partition is 14,566.8 MB, while the original is 14,566.7! I suspect that 0.1 MB difference has thrown off the geometry for LILO. So much for a sector by sector copy!
This is hardly what I'd call success.
I'm about ready to just boot into a Linux shell, us dd to copy it, and tell others to avoid the hassle of using TI.
Lance De Foa