DaveH6
December 10th, 2005, 05:32 PM
Hi,
This is one of my 1st post in Wilders.
I've used other Diamond software, eg tds, and thought it was good in comparison with the alternatives. Process Guard is though, imo, a couple of notches above. The idea afaik was´unique - in any case I feel way safer than with just a conventional signature or heuristic based scanner.
The downside, and maybe why again imo, PG is much more a personal than 'corporate' tool, that is it takes a lot of time to set/alter permissions. Anyway that's fine by me. The problem I'm having is in giving permission to *certain* appz. And it's weird, like pressing the 'add application' in the 'Protection' page never does squat. Even more worrying is that right-clicking to 'add to protection list' in the 'Security' page invariable invokes a dlg box informing me that the program either isn't an app (er, but its of the form <>.exe), or that it is already present in the list. Neither is the case.
I've ignored this for ages now, but when I think back I've never had success giving any of these progs. permission to do anything. I feel there's a problem here.
Thanks.
This is one of my 1st post in Wilders.
I've used other Diamond software, eg tds, and thought it was good in comparison with the alternatives. Process Guard is though, imo, a couple of notches above. The idea afaik was´unique - in any case I feel way safer than with just a conventional signature or heuristic based scanner.
The downside, and maybe why again imo, PG is much more a personal than 'corporate' tool, that is it takes a lot of time to set/alter permissions. Anyway that's fine by me. The problem I'm having is in giving permission to *certain* appz. And it's weird, like pressing the 'add application' in the 'Protection' page never does squat. Even more worrying is that right-clicking to 'add to protection list' in the 'Security' page invariable invokes a dlg box informing me that the program either isn't an app (er, but its of the form <>.exe), or that it is already present in the list. Neither is the case.
I've ignored this for ages now, but when I think back I've never had success giving any of these progs. permission to do anything. I feel there's a problem here.
Thanks.