nod or f-secure
July 5th, 2003, 02:02 PM
I have nod32 trail on 1 computer and f-secure trail on the other computer
Ive read a great deal conserning nod32 and f-secure.
Both are very good ,but f-secure seems to be much better at finding malware--trojans
But---i like how nod32 runs on the computer better.
Does nod32 plan on having a better unpacker engine in the future.[this is very important]
Now i do run trojan remover on my computer for backup.
Question--if you have a extra trojan program on your computer is there a need to have a better unpacking engine in your virus program?
I didnt come here to start a flame war--i only want you guys opinion between 2 very good companies.
I also like the interface of nod v2 better also.
Now when nod32 upgrades itself are you offered the upgrade at no extra cost as long as you are within your years worth of updates.
I doubt that when f-secure updates from 2003 to 2004 ill get that as an upgrade for no extra cost.
Thx for your opinions--i need to make a purchase here soon--almost at end of trail.
Ive read a great deal conserning nod32 and f-secure.
Both are very good ,but f-secure seems to be much better at finding malware--trojans
But---i like how nod32 runs on the computer better.
Does nod32 plan on having a better unpacker engine in the future.[this is very important]
Now i do run trojan remover on my computer for backup.
Question--if you have a extra trojan program on your computer is there a need to have a better unpacking engine in your virus program?
I didnt come here to start a flame war--i only want you guys opinion between 2 very good companies.
I also like the interface of nod v2 better also.
Now when nod32 upgrades itself are you offered the upgrade at no extra cost as long as you are within your years worth of updates.
I doubt that when f-secure updates from 2003 to 2004 ill get that as an upgrade for no extra cost.
Thx for your opinions--i need to make a purchase here soon--almost at end of trail.